↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEV233^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:40:37 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.62s 1.33s
% Output   : Refutation 1.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (   1 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  287 (  76 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  232 (  46   ~;  36   |;  32   &;  95   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  19  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   7   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   12 (   9 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   0   ^;  23   !;  13   ?;  36   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    cE: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    cD: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK0: $i > $o ).

thf(f46,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f26,f31,f36,f37,f41,f45]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f44]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f43,f35]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f33]) ).

thf(f33,definition,
    ( spl3_4
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    | spl3_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f42]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | spl3_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f21,f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( ( ( cD @ X3 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( ( ( $true
          = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
        & ( $true
         != ( cD @ sK1 ) ) )
      | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
          = $true )
        & ( $true
         != ( cE @ sK2 ) ) ) )
    & ! [X3: $i] :
        ( ( ( ( cD @ X3 )
            = $true )
          & ( $true
            = ( cE @ X3 ) ) )
        | ( $true
         != ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f7,f10,f9,f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ? [X1: $i] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
                = $true )
              & ( ( cD @ X1 )
               != $true ) )
          | ? [X2: $i] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                = $true )
              & ( ( cE @ X2 )
               != $true ) ) )
        & ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( ( ( cD @ X3 )
                = $true )
              & ( $true
                = ( cE @ X3 ) ) )
            | ( $true
             != ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ) )
   => ( ( ? [X1: $i] :
            ( ( ( sK0 @ X1 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( cD @ X1 )
             != $true ) )
        | ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( cE @ X2 )
             != $true ) ) )
      & ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( ( ( cD @ X3 )
              = $true )
            & ( $true
              = ( cE @ X3 ) ) )
          | ( $true
           != ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X1: $i] :
        ( ( ( sK0 @ X1 )
          = $true )
        & ( ( cD @ X1 )
         != $true ) )
   => ( ( $true
        = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
      & ( $true
       != ( cD @ sK1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
          = $true )
        & ( ( cE @ X2 )
         != $true ) )
   => ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        = $true )
      & ( $true
       != ( cE @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ? [X1: $i] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( cD @ X1 )
             != $true ) )
        | ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( cE @ X2 )
             != $true ) ) )
      & ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( ( ( cD @ X3 )
              = $true )
            & ( $true
              = ( cE @ X3 ) ) )
          | ( $true
           != ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ? [X3: $i] :
            ( ( $true
              = ( X0 @ X3 ) )
            & ( ( cD @ X3 )
             != $true ) )
        | ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( cE @ X2 )
             != $true ) ) )
      & ! [X1: $i] :
          ( ( ( ( cD @ X1 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( cE @ X1 )
              = $true ) )
          | ( ( X0 @ X1 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $o] :
        ( ! [X1: $i] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
              = $true )
           => ( ( ( cD @ X1 )
                = $true )
              & ( ( cE @ X1 )
                = $true ) ) )
       => ( ! [X3: $i] :
              ( ( $true
                = ( X0 @ X3 ) )
             => ( ( cD @ X3 )
                = $true ) )
          & ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( cE @ X2 )
                = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $o] :
        ( ! [X1: $i] :
            ( ( X0 @ X1 )
           => ( ( cE @ X1 )
              & ( cD @ X1 ) ) )
       => ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
             => ( cE @ X2 ) )
          & ! [X3: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X3 )
             => ( cD @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $o] :
        ( ! [X1: $i] :
            ( ( X0 @ X1 )
           => ( ( cE @ X1 )
              & ( cD @ X1 ) ) )
       => ( ! [X1: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X1 )
             => ( cE @ X1 ) )
          & ! [X1: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X1 )
             => ( cD @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i > $o] :
      ( ! [X1: $i] :
          ( ( X0 @ X1 )
         => ( ( cE @ X1 )
            & ( cD @ X1 ) ) )
     => ( ! [X1: $i] :
            ( ( X0 @ X1 )
           => ( cE @ X1 ) )
        & ! [X1: $i] :
            ( ( X0 @ X1 )
           => ( cD @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fh44r2n8F7/DTF2THF_26583.p',cTHM46_pme) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cD @ sK1 ) )
    | spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,definition,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> ( $true
      = ( cD @ sK1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_2
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f40]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_2
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f39,f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f23]) ).

thf(f23,definition,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
     != $true )
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f38]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
     != $true )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f30,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( cE @ X3 ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cE @ sK2 ) )
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,definition,
    ( spl3_3
  <=> ( $true
      = ( cE @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( spl3_4
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f16,f28,f33]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( cE @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( spl3_2
    | spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f17,f33,f23]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f14,f19,f28]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cD @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( cE @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f15,f23,f19]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cD @ sK1 ) )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEV233^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:40:56 EST 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.33  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.18/0.45  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.18/0.45  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.18/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.45  % File     : SEV233^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.18/0.45  % Domain   : Set Theory (Sets of sets)
% 0.18/0.45  % Problem  : TPS problem THM46
% 0.18/0.45  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.18/0.45  % English  :
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.18/0.45  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.18/0.45  % Names    : tps_0383 [Bro09]
% 0.18/0.45  %          : THM46 [TPS]
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.18/0.45  % Rating   : 0.08 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.08 v8.2.0, 0.09 v8.1.0, 0.08 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.3.0, 0.10 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.14 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.4.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.18/0.45  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    3 (   0 unt;   2 typ;   0 def)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Number of atoms       :    4 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Number of connectives :   13 (   0   ~;   0   |;   2   &;   7   @)
% 0.18/0.45  %                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   7 avg)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Number of symbols     :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 1-1 aty)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   4   !;   0   ?;   4   :)
% 0.18/0.45  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.18/0.45  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.18/0.45  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.18/0.45  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.18/0.45  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.18/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.45  thf(cE,type,
% 0.18/0.45      cE: $i > $o ).
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  thf(cD,type,
% 0.18/0.45      cD: $i > $o ).
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  thf(cTHM46_pme,conjecture,
% 0.18/0.45      ! [Xx: $i > $o] :
% 0.18/0.45        ( ! [Xx0: $i] :
% 0.18/0.45            ( ( Xx @ Xx0 )
% 0.18/0.45           => ( ( cD @ Xx0 )
% 0.18/0.45              & ( cE @ Xx0 ) ) )
% 0.18/0.45       => ( ! [Xx0: $i] :
% 0.18/0.45              ( ( Xx @ Xx0 )
% 0.18/0.45             => ( cD @ Xx0 ) )
% 0.18/0.45          & ! [Xx0: $i] :
% 0.18/0.45              ( ( Xx @ Xx0 )
% 0.18/0.45             => ( cE @ Xx0 ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.45  ------------------------
% 1.62/1.30  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.62/1.30  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.62/1.30  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:40:57 EST 2026
% 1.62/1.30  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.62/1.30  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.62/1.30  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.62/1.30  
% 1.62/1.30  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fh44r2n8F7/DTF2DTF26583.p
% See solution above
% 1.62/1.30  ------------------------
% 1.62/1.31  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.62/1.31  thf(cE,type,
% 1.62/1.31      cE: $i > $o ).
% 1.62/1.31  
% 1.62/1.31  thf(cD,type,
% 1.62/1.31      cD: $i > $o ).
% 1.62/1.31  
% 1.62/1.31  thf(cTHM46_pme,conjecture,
% 1.62/1.31      ! [Xx: $i > $o] :
% 1.62/1.31        ( ! [Xx0: $i] :
% 1.62/1.31            ( ( Xx @ Xx0 )
% 1.62/1.31           => ( ( cD @ Xx0 )
% 1.62/1.31              & ( cE @ Xx0 ) ) )
% 1.62/1.31       => ( ! [Xx0: $i] :
% 1.62/1.31              ( ( Xx @ Xx0 )
% 1.62/1.31             => ( cD @ Xx0 ) )
% 1.62/1.31          & ! [Xx0: $i] :
% 1.62/1.31              ( ( Xx @ Xx0 )
% 1.62/1.31             => ( cE @ Xx0 ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.62/1.31  ------------------------
% 1.62/1.33  % (26792)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26583 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.62/1.33  % (26792)First to succeed.
% 1.62/1.33  % (26792)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.62/1.33  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_26583
% 1.62/1.33  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_26583
% 1.62/1.33  thf(func_def_0, type, cE: $i > $o).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(func_def_1, type, cD: $i > $o).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(func_def_5, type, sK0: $i > $o).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f46,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    $false),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f26,f31,f36,f37,f41,f45])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f45,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    spl3_1 | ~spl3_4),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f44])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    $false | (spl3_1 | ~spl3_4)),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f43,f35])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f35,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ($true = (sK0 @ sK1)) | ~spl3_4),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f33])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f33,definition,(
% 1.62/1.33    spl3_4 <=> ($true = (sK0 @ sK1))),
% 1.62/1.33    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_4])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f43,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ($true != (sK0 @ sK1)) | spl3_1),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f42])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f42,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ($true != (sK0 @ sK1)) | ($true != $true) | spl3_1),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f21,f13])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ( ! [X3 : $i] : (((cD @ X3) = $true) | ($true != (sK0 @ X3))) )),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ((($true = (sK0 @ sK1)) & ($true != (cD @ sK1))) | (((sK0 @ sK2) = $true) & ($true != (cE @ sK2)))) & ! [X3 : $i] : ((((cD @ X3) = $true) & ($true = (cE @ X3))) | ($true != (sK0 @ X3)))),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f7,f10,f9,f8])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ? [X0 : $i > $o] : ((? [X1 : $i] : (((X0 @ X1) = $true) & ((cD @ X1) != $true)) | ? [X2 : $i] : (((X0 @ X2) = $true) & ((cE @ X2) != $true))) & ! [X3 : $i] : ((((cD @ X3) = $true) & ($true = (cE @ X3))) | ($true != (X0 @ X3)))) => ((? [X1 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X1) = $true) & ((cD @ X1) != $true)) | ? [X2 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X2) = $true) & ((cE @ X2) != $true))) & ! [X3 : $i] : ((((cD @ X3) = $true) & ($true = (cE @ X3))) | ($true != (sK0 @ X3))))),
% 1.62/1.33    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ? [X1 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X1) = $true) & ((cD @ X1) != $true)) => (($true = (sK0 @ sK1)) & ($true != (cD @ sK1)))),
% 1.62/1.33    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ? [X2 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X2) = $true) & ((cE @ X2) != $true)) => (((sK0 @ sK2) = $true) & ($true != (cE @ sK2)))),
% 1.62/1.33    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ? [X0 : $i > $o] : ((? [X1 : $i] : (((X0 @ X1) = $true) & ((cD @ X1) != $true)) | ? [X2 : $i] : (((X0 @ X2) = $true) & ((cE @ X2) != $true))) & ! [X3 : $i] : ((((cD @ X3) = $true) & ($true = (cE @ X3))) | ($true != (X0 @ X3))))),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ? [X0 : $i > $o] : ((? [X3 : $i] : (($true = (X0 @ X3)) & ((cD @ X3) != $true)) | ? [X2 : $i] : (((X0 @ X2) = $true) & ((cE @ X2) != $true))) & ! [X1 : $i] : ((((cD @ X1) = $true) & ((cE @ X1) = $true)) | ((X0 @ X1) != $true)))),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ~! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1 : $i] : (((X0 @ X1) = $true) => (((cD @ X1) = $true) & ((cE @ X1) = $true))) => (! [X3 : $i] : (($true = (X0 @ X3)) => ((cD @ X3) = $true)) & ! [X2 : $i] : (((X0 @ X2) = $true) => ((cE @ X2) = $true))))),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ~! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1 : $i] : ((X0 @ X1) => ((cE @ X1) & (cD @ X1))) => (! [X2 : $i] : ((X0 @ X2) => (cE @ X2)) & ! [X3 : $i] : ((X0 @ X3) => (cD @ X3))))),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.62/1.33    ~! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1 : $i] : ((X0 @ X1) => ((cE @ X1) & (cD @ X1))) => (! [X1 : $i] : ((X0 @ X1) => (cE @ X1)) & ! [X1 : $i] : ((X0 @ X1) => (cD @ X1))))),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.62/1.33    ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1 : $i] : ((X0 @ X1) => ((cE @ X1) & (cD @ X1))) => (! [X1 : $i] : ((X0 @ X1) => (cE @ X1)) & ! [X1 : $i] : ((X0 @ X1) => (cD @ X1))))),
% 1.62/1.33    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fh44r2n8F7/DTF2THF_26583.p',cTHM46_pme)).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ($true != (cD @ sK1)) | spl3_1),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f19,definition,(
% 1.62/1.33    spl3_1 <=> ($true = (cD @ sK1))),
% 1.62/1.33    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f41,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ~spl3_2 | spl3_3),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f40])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f40,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    $false | (~spl3_2 | spl3_3)),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f39,f25])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ((sK0 @ sK2) = $true) | ~spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f23])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f23,definition,(
% 1.62/1.33    spl3_2 <=> ((sK0 @ sK2) = $true)),
% 1.62/1.33    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ((sK0 @ sK2) != $true) | spl3_3),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f38])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f38,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ((sK0 @ sK2) != $true) | ($true != $true) | spl3_3),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f30,f12])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ( ! [X3 : $i] : (($true = (cE @ X3)) | ($true != (sK0 @ X3))) )),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ($true != (cE @ sK2)) | spl3_3),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f28])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f28,definition,(
% 1.62/1.33    spl3_3 <=> ($true = (cE @ sK2))),
% 1.62/1.33    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_3])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f37,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    spl3_4 | ~spl3_3),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f16,f28,f33])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ($true = (sK0 @ sK1)) | ($true != (cE @ sK2))),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f36,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    spl3_2 | spl3_4),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f17,f33,f23])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ((sK0 @ sK2) = $true) | ($true = (sK0 @ sK1))),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f31,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ~spl3_3 | ~spl3_1),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f14,f19,f28])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ($true != (cD @ sK1)) | ($true != (cE @ sK2))),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ~spl3_1 | spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f15,f23,f19])).
% 1.62/1.33  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.62/1.33    ($true != (cD @ sK1)) | ((sK0 @ sK2) = $true)),
% 1.62/1.33    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.62/1.33  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_26583
% 1.62/1.33  % (26792)------------------------------
% 1.62/1.33  % (26792)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.62/1.33  % (26792)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.62/1.33  
% 1.62/1.33  % (26792)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.62/1.33  % (26792)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.62/1.33  % (26792)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.62/1.33  % (26792)------------------------------
% 1.62/1.33  % (26792)------------------------------
% 1.62/1.33  % (26791)Success in time 0.013 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------