↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEV240^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:40:38 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.49s 1.26s
% Output   : Refutation 1.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   98 (  33 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   96 (  20   ~;   8   |;  14   &;  44   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   17 (  17   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0   ^;  15   !;  10   ?;  25   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    cA: ( a > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK1: a ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    ph3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f14,f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK0 ) )
    & ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
      = $true )
    & ! [X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( X2 @ sK1 ) )
        | ( ( cA @ X2 )
         != $true ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f8,f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( cA @ X0 )
          = $true )
        & ? [X1: a] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
              = $true )
            & ! [X2: a > $o] :
                ( ( ( X2 @ X1 )
                 != $true )
                | ( ( cA @ X2 )
                 != $true ) ) ) )
   => ( ( $true
        = ( cA @ sK0 ) )
      & ? [X1: a] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
          & ! [X2: a > $o] :
              ( ( ( X2 @ X1 )
               != $true )
              | ( ( cA @ X2 )
               != $true ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X1: a] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
        & ! [X2: a > $o] :
            ( ( ( X2 @ X1 )
             != $true )
            | ( ( cA @ X2 )
             != $true ) ) )
   => ( ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
        = $true )
      & ! [X2: a > $o] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( X2 @ sK1 ) )
          | ( ( cA @ X2 )
           != $true ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( cA @ X0 )
        = $true )
      & ? [X1: a] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
            = $true )
          & ! [X2: a > $o] :
              ( ( ( X2 @ X1 )
               != $true )
              | ( ( cA @ X2 )
               != $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( cA @ X0 )
          = $true )
       => ! [X1: a] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
              = $true )
           => ? [X2: a > $o] :
                ( ( ( X2 @ X1 )
                  = $true )
                & ( ( cA @ X2 )
                  = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o] :
        ( ( cA @ X0 )
       => ! [X1: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X1 )
           => ? [X2: a > $o] :
                ( ( cA @ X2 )
                & ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o] :
        ( ( cA @ X0 )
       => ! [X1: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X1 )
           => ? [X2: a > $o] :
                ( ( cA @ X2 )
                & ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: a > $o] :
      ( ( cA @ X0 )
     => ! [X1: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X1 )
         => ? [X2: a > $o] :
              ( ( cA @ X2 )
              & ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.VOeMbcbN7V/DTF2THF_1513.p',cDOMTHM1_pme) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
   != $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f10,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( cA @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( cA @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( X2 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEV240^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:43:33 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.27/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.27/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.27/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.46  % File     : SEV240^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.27/0.46  % Domain   : Set Theory (Sets of sets)
% 0.27/0.46  % Problem  : TPS problem from SETS-OF-SETS-THMS
% 0.27/0.46  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.27/0.46  % English  :
% 0.27/0.46  
% 0.27/0.46  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.27/0.46  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.27/0.46  % Names    : tps_0748 [Bro09]
% 0.27/0.46  
% 0.27/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.27/0.46  % Rating   : 0.00 v8.1.0, 0.08 v7.4.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.17 v6.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.27/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    3 (   0 unt;   2 typ;   0 def)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :    2 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Number of connectives :    7 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &;   4   @)
% 0.27/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   8 avg)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 1-1 aty)
% 0.27/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   0   ^;   2   !;   1   ?;   3   :)
% 0.27/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.27/0.46  
% 0.27/0.46  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.27/0.46  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.27/0.46  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.27/0.46  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.27/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.46  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.27/0.46      a: $tType ).
% 0.27/0.46  
% 0.27/0.46  thf(cA,type,
% 0.27/0.46      cA: ( a > $o ) > $o ).
% 0.27/0.46  
% 0.27/0.46  thf(cDOMTHM1_pme,conjecture,
% 0.27/0.46      ! [Xx: a > $o] :
% 0.27/0.46        ( ( cA @ Xx )
% 0.27/0.46       => ! [Xx0: a] :
% 0.27/0.46            ( ( Xx @ Xx0 )
% 0.27/0.46           => ? [S: a > $o] :
% 0.27/0.46                ( ( cA @ S )
% 0.27/0.46                & ( S @ Xx0 ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.27/0.46  
% 0.27/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.46  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.24  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.49/1.24  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.49/1.24  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:43:34 EST 2026
% 1.49/1.24  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.49/1.24  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.49/1.24  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.49/1.24  
% 1.49/1.24  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.VOeMbcbN7V/DTF2DTF1513.p
% See solution above
% 1.49/1.24  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.25  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.49/1.25  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.49/1.25      a: $tType ).
% 1.49/1.25  
% 1.49/1.25  thf(cA,type,
% 1.49/1.25      cA: ( a > $o ) > $o ).
% 1.49/1.25  
% 1.49/1.25  thf(cDOMTHM1_pme,conjecture,
% 1.49/1.25      ! [Xx: a > $o] :
% 1.49/1.25        ( ( cA @ Xx )
% 1.49/1.25       => ! [Xx0: a] :
% 1.49/1.25            ( ( Xx @ Xx0 )
% 1.49/1.25           => ? [S: a > $o] :
% 1.49/1.25                ( ( cA @ S )
% 1.49/1.25                & ( S @ Xx0 ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.49/1.25  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.26  % (1783)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_1513 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.49/1.26  % (1781)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_1513 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.49/1.26  % (1783)First to succeed.
% 1.49/1.26  % (1781)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.49/1.26  % (1783)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.49/1.26  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_1513
% 1.49/1.26  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_1513
% 1.49/1.26  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(func_def_1, type, cA: (a > $o) > $o).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(func_def_5, type, sK0: a > $o).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(func_def_6, type, sK1: a).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(func_def_9, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.49/1.26    $false),
% 1.49/1.26    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f14,f11])).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.49/1.26    ((sK0 @ sK1) = $true)),
% 1.49/1.26    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.49/1.26    ($true = (cA @ sK0)) & (((sK0 @ sK1) = $true) & ! [X2 : a > $o] : (($true != (X2 @ sK1)) | ((cA @ X2) != $true)))),
% 1.49/1.26    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f8,f7])).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.49/1.26    ? [X0 : a > $o] : (((cA @ X0) = $true) & ? [X1 : a] : (((X0 @ X1) = $true) & ! [X2 : a > $o] : (((X2 @ X1) != $true) | ((cA @ X2) != $true)))) => (($true = (cA @ sK0)) & ? [X1 : a] : (($true = (sK0 @ X1)) & ! [X2 : a > $o] : (((X2 @ X1) != $true) | ((cA @ X2) != $true))))),
% 1.49/1.26    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.49/1.26    ? [X1 : a] : (($true = (sK0 @ X1)) & ! [X2 : a > $o] : (((X2 @ X1) != $true) | ((cA @ X2) != $true))) => (((sK0 @ sK1) = $true) & ! [X2 : a > $o] : (($true != (X2 @ sK1)) | ((cA @ X2) != $true)))),
% 1.49/1.26    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.49/1.26    ? [X0 : a > $o] : (((cA @ X0) = $true) & ? [X1 : a] : (((X0 @ X1) = $true) & ! [X2 : a > $o] : (((X2 @ X1) != $true) | ((cA @ X2) != $true))))),
% 1.49/1.26    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.49/1.26    ~! [X0 : a > $o] : (((cA @ X0) = $true) => ! [X1 : a] : (((X0 @ X1) = $true) => ? [X2 : a > $o] : (((X2 @ X1) = $true) & ((cA @ X2) = $true))))),
% 1.49/1.26    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.49/1.26    ~! [X0 : a > $o] : ((cA @ X0) => ! [X1 : a] : ((X0 @ X1) => ? [X2 : a > $o] : ((cA @ X2) & (X2 @ X1))))),
% 1.49/1.26    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.49/1.26    ~! [X0 : a > $o] : ((cA @ X0) => ! [X1 : a] : ((X0 @ X1) => ? [X2 : a > $o] : ((cA @ X2) & (X2 @ X1))))),
% 1.49/1.26    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.49/1.26    ! [X0 : a > $o] : ((cA @ X0) => ! [X1 : a] : ((X0 @ X1) => ? [X2 : a > $o] : ((cA @ X2) & (X2 @ X1))))),
% 1.49/1.26    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.VOeMbcbN7V/DTF2THF_1513.p',cDOMTHM1_pme)).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.49/1.26    ((sK0 @ sK1) != $true)),
% 1.49/1.26    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.49/1.26    ($true != $true) | ((sK0 @ sK1) != $true)),
% 1.49/1.26    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f10,f12])).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.49/1.26    ($true = (cA @ sK0))),
% 1.49/1.26    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.49/1.26  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.49/1.26    ( ! [X2 : a > $o] : (((cA @ X2) != $true) | ($true != (X2 @ sK1))) )),
% 1.49/1.26    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.49/1.26  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_1513
% 1.49/1.26  % (1783)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.26  % (1783)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.49/1.26  % (1783)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.49/1.26  
% 1.49/1.26  % (1783)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.49/1.26  % (1783)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.49/1.26  % (1783)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.49/1.26  % (1783)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.26  % (1783)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.26  % (1778)Success in time 0.012 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------