↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEV282^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v6.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:03:01 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 8.65s 8.82s
% Output   : Proof 8.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SEV282^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v6.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 01:01:23 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 8.65/8.82  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 8.65/8.82  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 8.65/8.82    (Eq cNAT fun Xn =>
% 8.65/8.82      ∀ (Xp : ((Iota → Prop) → Prop) → Prop),
% 8.65/8.82        And (Xp cZERO) (∀ (Xx : (Iota → Prop) → Prop), Xp Xx → Xp (cSUCC Xx)) → Xp Xn)
% 8.65/8.82    True
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (cNAT cZERO)) True
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (cNAT cZERO) False
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #5 (by clausification #[2]): Eq cNAT fun Xn =>
% 8.65/8.82    ∀ (Xp : ((Iota → Prop) → Prop) → Prop), And (Xp cZERO) (∀ (Xx : (Iota → Prop) → Prop), Xp Xx → Xp (cSUCC Xx)) → Xp Xn
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #6 (by argument congruence #[5]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Prop) → Prop),
% 8.65/8.82    Eq (cNAT a)
% 8.65/8.82      ((fun Xn =>
% 8.65/8.82          ∀ (Xp : ((Iota → Prop) → Prop) → Prop),
% 8.65/8.82            And (Xp cZERO) (∀ (Xx : (Iota → Prop) → Prop), Xp Xx → Xp (cSUCC Xx)) → Xp Xn)
% 8.65/8.82        a)
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #7 (by betaEtaReduce #[6]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Prop) → Prop),
% 8.65/8.82    Eq (cNAT a)
% 8.65/8.82      (∀ (Xp : ((Iota → Prop) → Prop) → Prop),
% 8.65/8.82        And (Xp cZERO) (∀ (Xx : (Iota → Prop) → Prop), Xp Xx → Xp (cSUCC Xx)) → Xp a)
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #8 (by clausify Prop equality #[7]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Prop) → Prop),
% 8.65/8.82    Or (Eq (cNAT a) True)
% 8.65/8.82      (Eq
% 8.65/8.82        (∀ (Xp : ((Iota → Prop) → Prop) → Prop),
% 8.65/8.82          And (Xp cZERO) (∀ (Xx : (Iota → Prop) → Prop), Xp Xx → Xp (cSUCC Xx)) → Xp a)
% 8.65/8.82        False)
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #19 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Prop) → Prop) (a_1 : ((Iota → Prop) → Prop) → Prop),
% 8.65/8.82    Or (Eq (cNAT a) True)
% 8.65/8.82      (Eq
% 8.65/8.82        (Not
% 8.65/8.82          (And (skS.0 1 a a_1 cZERO) (∀ (Xx : (Iota → Prop) → Prop), skS.0 1 a a_1 Xx → skS.0 1 a a_1 (cSUCC Xx)) →
% 8.65/8.82            skS.0 1 a a_1 a))
% 8.65/8.82        True)
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Prop) → Prop) (a_1 : ((Iota → Prop) → Prop) → Prop),
% 8.65/8.82    Or (Eq (cNAT a) True)
% 8.65/8.82      (Eq
% 8.65/8.82        (And (skS.0 1 a a_1 cZERO) (∀ (Xx : (Iota → Prop) → Prop), skS.0 1 a a_1 Xx → skS.0 1 a a_1 (cSUCC Xx)) →
% 8.65/8.82          skS.0 1 a a_1 a)
% 8.65/8.82        False)
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #21 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Prop) → Prop) (a_1 : ((Iota → Prop) → Prop) → Prop),
% 8.65/8.82    Or (Eq (cNAT a) True)
% 8.65/8.82      (Eq (And (skS.0 1 a a_1 cZERO) (∀ (Xx : (Iota → Prop) → Prop), skS.0 1 a a_1 Xx → skS.0 1 a a_1 (cSUCC Xx))) True)
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #22 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Prop) → Prop) (a_1 : ((Iota → Prop) → Prop) → Prop), Or (Eq (cNAT a) True) (Eq (skS.0 1 a a_1 a) False)
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #24 (by clausification #[21]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Prop) → Prop) (a_1 : ((Iota → Prop) → Prop) → Prop),
% 8.65/8.82    Or (Eq (cNAT a) True) (Eq (skS.0 1 a a_1 cZERO) True)
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #293 (by superposition #[24, 22]): Or (Eq (cNAT fun x => cZERO x) True) (Or (Eq (cNAT cZERO) True) (Eq True False))
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #1531 (by betaEtaReduce #[293]): Or (Eq (cNAT cZERO) True) (Or (Eq (cNAT cZERO) True) (Eq True False))
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #1532 (by clausification #[1531]): Or (Eq (cNAT cZERO) True) (Eq (cNAT cZERO) True)
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #1533 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[1532]): Eq (cNAT cZERO) True
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #1534 (by superposition #[1533, 4]): Eq True False
% 8.65/8.82  Clause #1558 (by clausification #[1534]): False
% 8.65/8.82  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------