↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEV285^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:40:45 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.81s 1.52s
% Output   : Refutation 1.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   18 (  17 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   34 (   8   ~;   0   |;   5   &;  18   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (  10   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0   ^;  12   !;   6   ?;  18   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK0: a > b ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK1: a > b ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    ph3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    sK4: a ).

thf(f11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f10,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X2: a] :
      ( ( sK1 @ X2 )
      = ( sK0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ! [X2: a] :
        ( ( sK1 @ X2 )
        = ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
    & ( sK0 != sK1 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f5,f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > b,X1: a > b] :
        ( ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X2 )
            = ( X1 @ X2 ) )
        & ( X0 != X1 ) )
   => ( ! [X2: a] :
          ( ( sK1 @ X2 )
          = ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
      & ( sK0 != sK1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ? [X0: a > b,X1: a > b] :
      ( ! [X2: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X2 )
          = ( X1 @ X2 ) )
      & ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ? [X1: a > b,X0: a > b] :
      ( ! [X2: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X2 )
          = ( X1 @ X2 ) )
      & ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: a > b,X1: a > b] :
        ( ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X2 )
            = ( X1 @ X2 ) )
       => ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: a > b,X1: a > b] :
      ( ! [X2: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X2 )
          = ( X1 @ X2 ) )
     => ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ve9fHHStOj/DTF2THF_11189.p',cEE_eq_) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
   != ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    sK0 != sK1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SEV285^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:42:53 EST 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.19/0.47  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.19/0.47  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.19/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  % File     : SEV285^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.19/0.47  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.19/0.47  % Problem  : TPS problem from TTTP-NATS-THMS
% 0.19/0.47  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.19/0.47  % English  :
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.47  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.19/0.47  % Names    : tps_0087 [Bro09]
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.19/0.47  % Rating   : 0.00 v8.2.0, 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.09 v7.5.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.29 v6.1.0, 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.40 v4.1.0, 0.33 v4.0.0
% 0.19/0.47  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    3 (   0 unt;   2 typ;   0 def)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of atoms       :    2 (   2 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of connectives :    3 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   2   @)
% 0.19/0.47  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   5 avg)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of types       :    2 (   2 usr)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of type conns  :    2 (   2   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of symbols     :    1 (   0 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   0   ^;   3   !;   0   ?;   3   :)
% 0.19/0.47  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.19/0.47  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.19/0.47  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.19/0.47  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.19/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.19/0.47      a: $tType ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  thf(b_type,type,
% 0.19/0.47      b: $tType ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  thf(cEE_eq_,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.47      ! [F: a > b,G: a > b] :
% 0.19/0.47        ( ! [A: a] :
% 0.19/0.47            ( ( F @ A )
% 0.19/0.47            = ( G @ A ) )
% 0.19/0.47       => ( F = G ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  ------------------------
% 1.61/1.48  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.61/1.48  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.61/1.48  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:42:54 EST 2026
% 1.61/1.48  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.61/1.48  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.61/1.48  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.61/1.48  
% 1.61/1.48  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ve9fHHStOj/DTF2DTF11189.p
% See solution above
% 1.61/1.48  ------------------------
% 1.61/1.49  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.61/1.49  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.61/1.49      a: $tType ).
% 1.61/1.49  
% 1.61/1.49  thf(b_type,type,
% 1.61/1.49      b: $tType ).
% 1.61/1.49  
% 1.61/1.49  thf(cEE_eq_,conjecture,
% 1.61/1.49      ! [F: a > b,G: a > b] :
% 1.61/1.49        ( ! [A: a] :
% 1.61/1.49            ( ( F @ A )
% 1.61/1.49            = ( G @ A ) )
% 1.61/1.49       => ( F = G ) ) ).
% 1.61/1.49  ------------------------
% 1.81/1.51  % (11289)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11189 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.81/1.51  % (11288)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11189 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.81/1.51  % (11287)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11189 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.81/1.51  % (11286)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11189 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.81/1.51  % (11290)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11189 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.81/1.51  % (11291)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11189 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.81/1.51  % (11292)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11189 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.81/1.52  % (11290)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.81/1.52  % (11290)------------------------------
% 1.81/1.52  % (11290)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.81/1.52  % (11290)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.81/1.52  % (11290)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.81/1.52  
% 1.81/1.52  % (11290)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.81/1.52  % (11290)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.81/1.52  % (11291)First to succeed.
% 1.81/1.52  % (11290)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.81/1.52  % (11290)------------------------------
% 1.81/1.52  % (11290)------------------------------
% 1.81/1.52  % (11289)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.81/1.52  % (11287)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.81/1.52  % (11291)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.81/1.52  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_11189
% 1.81/1.52  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_11189
% 1.81/1.52  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(type_def_6, type, b: $tType).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(func_def_1, type, b: $tType).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(func_def_5, type, sK0: a > b).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(func_def_6, type, sK1: a > b).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(func_def_8, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(func_def_9, type, sK4: a).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.81/1.52    $false),
% 1.81/1.52    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f10,f9])).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.81/1.52    ( ! [X2 : a] : (((sK1 @ X2) = (sK0 @ X2))) )),
% 1.81/1.52    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.81/1.52    ! [X2 : a] : ((sK1 @ X2) = (sK0 @ X2)) & (sK0 != sK1)),
% 1.81/1.52    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f5,f6])).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.81/1.52    ? [X0 : a > b,X1 : a > b] : (! [X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) = (X1 @ X2)) & (X0 != X1)) => (! [X2 : a] : ((sK1 @ X2) = (sK0 @ X2)) & (sK0 != sK1))),
% 1.81/1.52    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.81/1.52    ? [X0 : a > b,X1 : a > b] : (! [X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) = (X1 @ X2)) & (X0 != X1))),
% 1.81/1.52    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.81/1.52    ? [X1 : a > b,X0 : a > b] : (! [X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) = (X1 @ X2)) & (X0 != X1))),
% 1.81/1.52    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.81/1.52    ~! [X0 : a > b,X1 : a > b] : (! [X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) = (X1 @ X2)) => (X0 = X1))),
% 1.81/1.52    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.81/1.52    ! [X0 : a > b,X1 : a > b] : (! [X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) = (X1 @ X2)) => (X0 = X1))),
% 1.81/1.52    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ve9fHHStOj/DTF2THF_11189.p',cEE_eq_)).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.81/1.52    ((sK1 @ sK4) != (sK0 @ sK4))),
% 1.81/1.52    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.81/1.52  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.81/1.52    (sK0 != sK1)),
% 1.81/1.52    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.81/1.52  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_11189
% 1.81/1.52  % (11291)------------------------------
% 1.81/1.52  % (11291)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.81/1.52  % (11291)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.81/1.52  
% 1.81/1.52  % (11291)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.81/1.52  % (11291)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.81/1.52  % (11291)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.81/1.52  % (11291)------------------------------
% 1.81/1.52  % (11291)------------------------------
% 1.81/1.52  % (11285)Success in time 0.016 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------