↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEV288^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:38:11 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.28s 0.41s
% Output   : Refutation 0.52s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   21
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   52 (  15 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  162 (  63 equ;   3 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  212 (  42   ~;  44   |;   0   &;  89   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  20  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   36 (  36   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   21 (  16 usr;  10 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (  13  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   0 sgn   8   !;   0   ?;  57   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    sK0: a ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    sK1: a ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    sK2: a > $o ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a,X1: a] : ( X0 = X1 ) )
    = ( ^ [X0: a,X1: a] :
        ! [X2: a > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cE1_eq__pme) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a,X1: a] : ( X0 = X1 ) )
   != ( ^ [X0: a,X1: a] :
        ! [X2: a > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f3,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a,X1: a] : ( X0 = X1 ) )
   != ( ^ [X2: a,X3: a] :
        ! [X4: a > $o] :
          ( ( X4 @ X2 )
         => ( X4 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] :
          ( !! @ ( a > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] :
          ( !! @ ( a > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] :
          ( !! @ ( a > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( (=)
   != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] :
          ( !! @ ( a > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] :
          ( !! @ ( a > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ sK0 )
   != ( (=) @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( !! @ ( a > $o )
          @ ^ [Y1: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y1 @ sK0 )
             => ( Y1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
   != ( (=) @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( !! @ ( a > $o )
          @ ^ [Y1: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y1 @ sK0 )
             => ( Y1 @ Y0 ) ) )
      @ sK1 )
   != ( sK0 = sK1 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 = sK1 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( !! @ ( a > $o )
            @ ^ [Y1: a > $o] :
                ( ( Y1 @ sK0 )
               => ( Y1 @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( !! @ ( a > $o )
            @ ^ [Y1: a > $o] :
                ( ( Y1 @ sK0 )
               => ( Y1 @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 = sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( sK1 != sK0 )
    | ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( !! @ ( a > $o )
            @ ^ [Y1: a > $o] :
                ( ( Y1 @ sK0 )
               => ( Y1 @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( sK1 != sK0 )
    | ( ( !! @ ( a > $o )
        @ ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ sK0 )
           => ( Y0 @ sK1 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( sK1 != sK0 )
    | ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ sK0 )
           => ( Y0 @ sK1 ) )
        @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( sK1 != sK0 )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK2 @ sK0 )
       => ( sK2 @ sK1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( sK1 != sK0 )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( sK1 != sK0 )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK0 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( !! @ ( a > $o )
            @ ^ [Y1: a > $o] :
                ( ( Y1 @ sK0 )
               => ( Y1 @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK1 ) )
    | ( sK1 = sK0 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( sK1 = sK0 )
    | ( $true
      = ( !! @ ( a > $o )
        @ ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ sK0 )
           => ( Y0 @ sK1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ! [X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( sK1 = sK0 )
      | ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y0 @ sK0 )
             => ( Y0 @ sK1 ) )
          @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ! [X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( ( X1 @ sK0 )
         => ( X1 @ sK1 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( sK1 = sK0 ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK1 ) )
      | ( ( X1 @ sK0 )
        = $false )
      | ( sK1 = sK0 ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f27,definition,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> ( sK1 = sK0 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( sK1 = sK0 )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( sK1 != sK0 )
    | spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f31,definition,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> ( ( sK2 @ sK0 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK0 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f31]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f20,f31,f27]) ).

thf(f36,definition,
    ( spl3_3
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK1 ) )
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f36]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f19,f27,f36]) ).

thf(f41,definition,
    ( spl3_4
  <=> ! [X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( X1 @ sK1 ) )
        | ( ( X1 @ sK0 )
          = $false ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( X1 @ sK1 ) )
        | ( ( X1 @ sK0 )
          = $false ) )
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f41]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ( spl3_4
    | spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f25,f27,f41]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( ( sK1 = sK0 )
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[],[f42]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f44,f29]) ).

thf(f57,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f56]) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK0 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f38,f28]) ).

thf(f59,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f58,f33]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f59]) ).

thf(f61,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f60]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f34]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f39]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | spl3_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f43]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f57]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f61]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    spl3_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s3,s5]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    spl3_3,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s7]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    spl3_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s7]) ).

cnf(s10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s6,s7,s8,s9]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SEV288^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.28  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.28  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.28  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.28  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.28  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:31:00 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.28  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.28/0.34  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.28/0.35  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/0.41  % (2808360)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.28/0.41  % (2808365)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=3523990449:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.28/0.41  % (2808365) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2808360-2808365"...
% 0.28/0.41  % (2808365)...printing done.
% 0.28/0.41  % (2808365)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.28/0.41  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.28/0.41  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.52/0.41  % (2808365)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.41  % (2808365)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.52/0.41  % (2808365)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.52/0.41  % (2808365)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.52/0.41  % (2808365)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.52/0.41  % (2808365)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.52/0.41  % (2808365)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.52/0.41  % (2808365)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.52/0.41  % (2808360)Success in time 0.038 s
% 0.52/0.41  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------