↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEV385^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:37:13 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.06s 2.48s
% Output   : Refutation 4.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   74 (  73 equ;  12 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  119 (  20   ~;  11   |;  16   &;  64   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (  11   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (  14   ^;  18   !;   7   ?;  41   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   2  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(b_type,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(a_type,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(x_decl,type,
    x: b ).

thf(y_decl,type,
    y: a ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: ( b > a ) > b ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: ( b > a ) > a ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( ^ [A: b > a] :
        @+[B: b] :
          ~ ( ( x = B )
           => ( y
              = ( A @ B ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( ^ [A: b > a] :
        @+[B: a] :
          ~ ( ( y = B )
           => ? [C: b] :
                ( ( ^ [D: b] :
                      ( ( x = D )
                      & ( B
                        = ( A @ D ) ) ) )
                = ( (=) @ b @ C ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [A: b > a] :
      ( ! [B: b] :
          ( ( x = B )
         => ( y
            = ( A @ B ) ) )
      & ! [B: a] :
          ( ( y = B )
         => ? [C: b] :
              ( ( ^ [D: b] :
                    ( ( x = D )
                    & ( B
                      = ( A @ D ) ) ) )
              = ( (=) @ b @ C ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cX6004_pme) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: b > a] :
        ( ! [B: b] :
            ( ( x = B )
           => ( y
              = ( A @ B ) ) )
        & ! [B: a] :
            ( ( y = B )
           => ? [C: b] :
                ( ( ^ [D: b] :
                      ( ( x = D )
                      & ( B
                        = ( A @ D ) ) ) )
                = ( (=) @ b @ C ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ? [A: b > a] :
        ( ! [B: b] :
            ( ( x = B )
           => ( y
              = ( A @ B ) ) )
        & ! [B: a] :
            ( ( y = B )
           => ? [C: b] :
                ( ( ^ [D: b] :
                      ( ( x = D )
                      & ( B
                        = ( A @ D ) ) ) )
                = ( (=) @ b @ C ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [B: b,A: b > a] :
      ( ( ( x
          = ( sk1 @ A ) )
        | ( y
          = ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      & ( ( x
          = ( sk1 @ A ) )
        | ( ( ^ [C: b] :
                ( ( x = C )
                & ( ( sk2 @ A )
                  = ( A @ C ) ) ) )
         != ( (=) @ b @ B ) ) )
      & ( ( y
         != ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
        | ( y
          = ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      & ( ( y
         != ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
        | ( ( ^ [C: b] :
                ( ( x = C )
                & ( ( sk2 @ A )
                  = ( A @ C ) ) ) )
         != ( (=) @ b @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [A: b > a] :
      ( ( y
       != ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
      | ( y
        = ( sk2 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: b > a] :
      ( ( y
       != ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
      | ( ( sk2 @ A )
        = y ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ( sk2
      @ ^ [A: b] : y )
    = y ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[11:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [B: b] : y ))]]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [B: b,A: b > a] :
      ( ( y
       != ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
      | ( ( ^ [C: b] :
              ( ( x = C )
              & ( ( sk2 @ A )
                = ( A @ C ) ) ) )
       != ( (=) @ b @ B ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [B: b,A: b > a] :
      ( ( y
       != ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
      | ( ( ^ [C: b] :
              ( ( x = C )
              & ( ( sk2 @ A )
                = ( A @ C ) ) ) )
       != ( (=) @ b @ B ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(55,plain,
    ! [B: b,A: b > a] :
      ( ( y
       != ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
      | ( ( ^ [C: b] :
              ( ( x = C )
              & ( y
                = ( A @ C ) ) ) )
       != ( (=) @ b @ B ) )
      | ( ( sk2
          @ ^ [C: b] : y )
       != ( sk2 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[13,12]) ).

thf(56,plain,
    ! [A: b] :
      ( ( y != y )
      | ( ( ^ [B: b] :
              ( ( x = B )
              & ( y = y ) ) )
       != ( (=) @ b @ A ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[55:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [C: b] : y ))]]) ).

thf(62,plain,
    ! [A: b] :
      ( ( (=) @ b @ x )
     != ( (=) @ b @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[56]) ).

thf(67,plain,
    $false,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[62:[bind(A,$thf( x ))]]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEV385^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.22  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.22  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.22  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.22  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.22  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.22  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:46:33 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.03/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.20/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (198ms). 
% 1.20/1.02  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.96/1.44  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.96/1.45  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.17/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.17/1.58  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.17/1.58  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.17/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.17/1.59  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.06/2.47  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.06/2.48  % Time passed: 2119ms (effective reasoning time: 1443ms)
% 4.06/2.48  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.06/2.48  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 4.06/2.48  % No. of inferences in proof: 13
% 4.06/2.48  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2119 ms resp. 1443 ms w/o parsing
% 4.35/2.54  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.35/2.55  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------