↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEV386^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:41:08 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.24s 1.19s
% Output   : Refutation 1.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   88 (   1 unt;   0 typ;   7 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  532 ( 217 equ;  12 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  567 ( 196   ~; 185   |;  18   &; 149   @)
%                                         (  11 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   20 (  16 usr;  13 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  129 (  34   ^;  76   !;  19   ?; 129   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    p: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    sK0: a > a ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    sK1: a ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    sK2: a ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    ph4: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    sK5: a > a ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    sK6: a > a ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    sK7: a ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    sK8: a > a ).

thf(f193,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f27,f35,f39,f44,f98,f111,f154,f161,f191]) ).

thf(f191,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f190]) ).

thf(f190,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f181]) ).

thf(f181,plain,
    ( ( sK1 != sK1 )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f179,f43]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ( ( ( p @ sK1 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f41]) ).

thf(f41,definition,
    ( spl3_6
  <=> ( ( p @ sK1 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_6])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f179,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( p @ X0 )
          = $false )
        | ( sK1 != X0 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f178]) ).

thf(f178,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( X0 != X0 )
        | ( ( p @ X0 )
          = $false )
        | ( sK1 != X0 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f165,f174]) ).

thf(f174,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( sK8 @ X0 )
          = X0 )
        | ( sK1 != X0 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(equality_factoring,[status(thm)],[f171]) ).

thf(f171,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( sK1
          = ( sK8 @ X0 ) )
        | ( ( sK8 @ X0 )
          = X0 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f170]) ).

thf(f170,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( $true != $true )
        | ( ( sK8 @ X0 )
          = X0 )
        | ( sK1
          = ( sK8 @ X0 ) ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f34,f166]) ).

thf(f166,plain,
    ( ! [X2: a] :
        ( ( ( p @ ( sK8 @ X2 ) )
          = $true )
        | ( ( sK8 @ X2 )
          = X2 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f163]) ).

thf(f163,plain,
    ( ! [X2: a] :
        ( ( ( X2
            = ( sK8 @ X2 ) )
          = $true )
        | ( ( p @ ( sK8 @ X2 ) )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f162]) ).

thf(f162,plain,
    ( ! [X2: a] :
        ( ( X2
          = ( sK8 @ X2 ) )
       != ( p @ ( sK8 @ X2 ) ) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ! [X2: a] :
        ( p
       != ( (=) @ X2 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,definition,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> ! [X2: a] :
        ( p
       != ( (=) @ X2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ! [X4: a] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( p @ X4 ) )
        | ( sK1 = X4 ) )
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f33]) ).

thf(f33,definition,
    ( spl3_4
  <=> ! [X4: a] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( p @ X4 ) )
        | ( sK1 = X4 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f165,plain,
    ( ! [X2: a] :
        ( ( ( p @ ( sK8 @ X2 ) )
          = $false )
        | ( ( sK8 @ X2 )
         != X2 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f164]) ).

thf(f164,plain,
    ( ! [X2: a] :
        ( ( ( X2
            = ( sK8 @ X2 ) )
          = $false )
        | ( ( p @ ( sK8 @ X2 ) )
          = $false ) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f162]) ).

thf(f161,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_6
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f160]) ).

thf(f160,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_6
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f156]) ).

thf(f156,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ~ spl3_6
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f66,f43]) ).

thf(f66,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( p @ X0 )
       != $true )
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f65]) ).

thf(f65,definition,
    ( spl3_8
  <=> ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( p @ X0 )
       != $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_8])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f154,plain,
    ( spl3_8
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_4
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f153,f37,f33,f25,f65]) ).

thf(f25,definition,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( p @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
          = $true )
        | ( ( p @ X0 )
         != $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f37,definition,
    ( spl3_5
  <=> ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( p @ X0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( sK0 @ X0 )
         != X0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f153,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( p @ X0 )
       != $true )
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_4
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f151,f34]) ).

thf(f151,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( p @ X0 )
         != $true )
        | ( sK1 != X0 ) )
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_4
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f150]) ).

thf(f150,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( sK1 != X0 )
        | ( ( p @ X0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( p @ X0 )
         != $true ) )
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_4
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f38,f115]) ).

thf(f115,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( sK0 @ X0 )
          = sK1 )
        | ( ( p @ X0 )
         != $true ) )
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f112]) ).

thf(f112,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( p @ X0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( sK0 @ X0 )
          = sK1 )
        | ( $true != $true ) )
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f34,f26]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( p @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
          = $true )
        | ( ( p @ X0 )
         != $true ) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f25]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( sK0 @ X0 )
         != X0 )
        | ( ( p @ X0 )
         != $true ) )
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f37]) ).

thf(f111,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f110]) ).

thf(f110,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f109]) ).

thf(f109,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] : ( sK2 != X0 )
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f107,f48]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( ( p @ X1 )
          = $true )
        | ( sK2 != X1 ) )
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f47]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( ( sK2 = X1 )
          = $false )
        | ( ( p @ X1 )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f45]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( sK2 = X1 )
        = ( p @ X1 ) )
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f31]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( p
      = ( (=) @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,definition,
    ( spl3_3
  <=> ( p
      = ( (=) @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f107,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( sK2 != X0 )
        | ( ( p @ X0 )
         != $true ) )
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f106]) ).

thf(f106,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( sK2 != X0 )
        | ( ( p @ X0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( p @ X0 )
         != $true ) )
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f38,f104]) ).

thf(f104,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( sK0 @ X0 )
          = sK2 )
        | ( ( p @ X0 )
         != $true ) )
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f101]) ).

thf(f101,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( $true = $false )
        | ( ( sK0 @ X0 )
          = sK2 )
        | ( ( p @ X0 )
         != $true ) )
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f26,f49]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( ( p @ X1 )
          = $false )
        | ( sK2 = X1 ) )
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f46]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( ( p @ X1 )
          = $false )
        | ( ( sK2 = X1 )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f45]) ).

thf(f98,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f97]) ).

thf(f97,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f96]) ).

thf(f96,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] : ( sK2 != X0 )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f95]) ).

thf(f95,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( sK2 != X0 )
        | ( X0 != X0 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f94]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( sK2 != X0 )
        | ( X0 != X0 )
        | ( sK2 != X0 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f86,f91]) ).

thf(f91,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( sK6 @ X0 )
          = X0 )
        | ( sK2 != X0 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f89]) ).

thf(f89,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( sK2 != X0 )
        | ( ( sK6 @ X0 )
          = X0 )
        | ( sK2 != sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f86,f88]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( sK2
          = ( sK6 @ X0 ) )
        | ( ( sK6 @ X0 )
          = X0 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f87]) ).

thf(f87,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( X0
            = ( sK6 @ X0 ) )
          = $true )
        | ( sK2
          = ( sK6 @ X0 ) ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f83]) ).

thf(f83,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( sK2
            = ( sK6 @ X0 ) )
          = $true )
        | ( ( X0
            = ( sK6 @ X0 ) )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f80]) ).

thf(f80,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( sK2
          = ( sK6 @ X0 ) )
       != ( X0
          = ( sK6 @ X0 ) ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f71]) ).

thf(f71,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( (=) @ sK2 )
       != ( (=) @ X0 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f70]) ).

thf(f70,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( p != p )
        | ( ( (=) @ sK2 )
         != ( (=) @ X0 ) ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f23,f31]) ).

thf(f86,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( sK2
         != ( sK6 @ X0 ) )
        | ( ( sK6 @ X0 )
         != X0 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f85]) ).

thf(f85,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( sK6 @ X0 )
         != X0 )
        | ( ( sK2
            = ( sK6 @ X0 ) )
          = $false ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f84]) ).

thf(f84,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( X0
            = ( sK6 @ X0 ) )
          = $false )
        | ( ( sK2
            = ( sK6 @ X0 ) )
          = $false ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f80]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( spl3_6
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f17,f29,f41]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( p
      = ( (=) @ sK2 ) )
    | ( ( p @ sK1 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( p
      = ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
        @ sK2 ) )
    | ( ( p @ sK1 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( ! [X0: a] :
          ( ( ( p @ X0 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( ( sK0 @ X0 )
             != X0 )
            & ( ( p @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
              = $true ) ) )
      | ! [X2: a] :
          ( p
         != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
            @ X2 ) ) )
    & ( ( ( ( p @ sK1 )
          = $true )
        & ! [X4: a] :
            ( ( sK1 = X4 )
            | ( $true
             != ( p @ X4 ) ) ) )
      | ( p
        = ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
          @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f11,f10,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X0: a] :
      ( ? [X1: a] :
          ( ( X0 != X1 )
          & ( ( p @ X1 )
            = $true ) )
     => ( ( ( sK0 @ X0 )
         != X0 )
        & ( ( p @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
          = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X3: a] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( p @ X3 ) )
        & ! [X4: a] :
            ( ( X3 = X4 )
            | ( $true
             != ( p @ X4 ) ) ) )
   => ( ( ( p @ sK1 )
        = $true )
      & ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( sK1 = X4 )
          | ( $true
           != ( p @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ? [X5: a] :
        ( p
        = ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
          @ X5 ) )
   => ( p
      = ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
        @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( ! [X0: a] :
          ( ( ( p @ X0 )
           != $true )
          | ? [X1: a] :
              ( ( X0 != X1 )
              & ( ( p @ X1 )
                = $true ) ) )
      | ! [X2: a] :
          ( p
         != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
            @ X2 ) ) )
    & ( ? [X3: a] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( p @ X3 ) )
          & ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X3 = X4 )
              | ( $true
               != ( p @ X4 ) ) ) )
      | ? [X5: a] :
          ( p
          = ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
            @ X5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ( ! [X0: a] :
          ( ( ( p @ X0 )
           != $true )
          | ? [X1: a] :
              ( ( X0 != X1 )
              & ( ( p @ X1 )
                = $true ) ) )
      | ! [X2: a] :
          ( p
         != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
            @ X2 ) ) )
    & ( ? [X0: a] :
          ( ( ( p @ X0 )
            = $true )
          & ! [X1: a] :
              ( ( X0 = X1 )
              | ( ( p @ X1 )
               != $true ) ) )
      | ? [X2: a] :
          ( p
          = ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
            @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ? [X2: a] :
        ( p
        = ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
          @ X2 ) )
  <~> ? [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( p @ X0 )
          = $true )
        & ! [X1: a] :
            ( ( X0 = X1 )
            | ( ( p @ X1 )
             != $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ( ? [X0: a] :
          ( ( ( p @ X0 )
            = $true )
          & ! [X1: a] :
              ( ( ( p @ X1 )
                = $true )
             => ( X0 = X1 ) ) )
    <=> ? [X2: a] :
          ( p
          = ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
            @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ( ? [X0: a] :
          ( ! [X1: a] :
              ( ( p @ X1 )
             => ( X0 = X1 ) )
          & ( p @ X0 ) )
    <=> ? [X2: a] :
          ( p
          = ( ^ [X3: a,X4: a] : ( X3 = X4 )
            @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ? [X0: a] :
          ( ! [X2: a] :
              ( ( p @ X2 )
             => ( X0 = X2 ) )
          & ( p @ X0 ) )
    <=> ? [X0: a] :
          ( p
          = ( ^ [X1: a,X0: a] : ( X0 = X1 )
            @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ? [X0: a] :
        ( ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( p @ X2 )
           => ( X0 = X2 ) )
        & ( p @ X0 ) )
  <=> ? [X0: a] :
        ( p
        = ( ^ [X1: a,X0: a] : ( X0 = X1 )
          @ X0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c6oRckkeWf/DTF2THF_11890.p',cTTTP5306A_pme) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | spl3_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f18,f37,f22]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X0: a] :
      ( ( ( p @ X0 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( sK0 @ X0 )
       != X0 )
      | ( p
       != ( (=) @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X0: a] :
      ( ( p
       != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
          @ X2 ) )
      | ( ( p @ X0 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( sK0 @ X0 )
       != X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( spl3_3
    | spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f19,f33,f29]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X4: a] :
      ( ( p
        = ( (=) @ sK2 ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( p @ X4 ) )
      | ( sK1 = X4 ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X4: a] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( p @ X4 ) )
      | ( sK1 = X4 )
      | ( p
        = ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
          @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f20,f25,f22]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X0: a] :
      ( ( p
       != ( (=) @ X2 ) )
      | ( ( p @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( p @ X0 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X0: a] :
      ( ( ( p @ X0 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( p @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( p
       != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
          @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SEV386^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:45:55 EST 2026
% 0.13/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.32  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.43  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.16/0.43  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.16/0.43  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43  % File     : SEV386^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.16/0.43  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.16/0.43  % Problem  : TPS problem TTTP5306A
% 0.16/0.43  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.16/0.43  % English  :
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.16/0.43  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.16/0.43  % Names    : tps_0467 [Bro09]
% 0.16/0.43  %          : TTTP5306A [TPS]
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.16/0.43  % Rating   : 0.00 v9.0.0, 0.10 v8.2.0, 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.22 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.0.0, 0.29 v6.4.0, 0.33 v6.3.0, 0.40 v6.2.0, 0.57 v6.1.0, 0.43 v6.0.0, 0.29 v5.5.0, 0.33 v5.4.0, 0.40 v5.1.0, 0.60 v5.0.0, 0.40 v4.1.0, 0.33 v4.0.1, 0.67 v4.0.0
% 0.16/0.43  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    3 (   0 unt;   2 typ;   0 def)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Number of atoms       :    6 (   3 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   6 avg)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Number of connectives :    6 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &;   3   @)
% 0.16/0.43  %                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   7 avg)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Number of type conns  :    1 (   1   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Number of symbols     :    2 (   1 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Number of variables   :    5 (   2   ^;   1   !;   2   ?;   5   :)
% 0.16/0.43  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.16/0.43  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.16/0.43  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.16/0.43  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.16/0.43  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.16/0.43  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.16/0.43      a: $tType ).
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  thf(p,type,
% 0.16/0.43      p: a > $o ).
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  thf(cTTTP5306A_pme,conjecture,
% 0.16/0.43      ( ? [Xy: a] :
% 0.16/0.43          ( p
% 0.16/0.43          = ( ^ [Xx: a,Xy: a] : ( Xx = Xy )
% 0.16/0.43            @ Xy ) )
% 0.16/0.43    <=> ? [Xy: a] :
% 0.16/0.43          ( ( p @ Xy )
% 0.16/0.43          & ! [Xz: a] :
% 0.16/0.43              ( ( p @ Xz )
% 0.16/0.43             => ( Xy = Xz ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43  ------------------------
% 1.24/1.16  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.24/1.16  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.24/1.16  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:45:56 EST 2026
% 1.24/1.16  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.24/1.16  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.24/1.16  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.24/1.16  
% 1.24/1.16  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c6oRckkeWf/DTF2DTF11890.p
% See solution above
% 1.24/1.16  ------------------------
% 1.24/1.17  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.24/1.17  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.24/1.17      a: $tType ).
% 1.24/1.17  
% 1.24/1.17  thf(p,type,
% 1.24/1.17      p: a > $o ).
% 1.24/1.17  
% 1.24/1.17  thf(cTTTP5306A_pme,conjecture,
% 1.24/1.17      ( ? [Xy: a] :
% 1.24/1.17          ( p
% 1.24/1.17          = ( ^ [Xx: a,Xy: a] : ( Xx = Xy )
% 1.24/1.17            @ Xy ) )
% 1.24/1.17    <=> ? [Xy: a] :
% 1.24/1.17          ( ( p @ Xy )
% 1.24/1.17          & ! [Xz: a] :
% 1.24/1.17              ( ( p @ Xz )
% 1.24/1.17             => ( Xy = Xz ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.24/1.17  ------------------------
% 1.24/1.18  % (11987)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11890 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.24/1.19  % (11987)First to succeed.
% 1.24/1.19  % (11991)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11890 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.24/1.19  % (11993)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11890 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.24/1.19  % (11989)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11890 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.24/1.19  % (11992)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11890 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.24/1.19  % (11990)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11890 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.24/1.19  % (11988)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11890 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.24/1.19  % (11991)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.24/1.19  % (11991)------------------------------
% 1.24/1.19  % (11991)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.24/1.19  % (11991)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.24/1.19  % (11991)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.24/1.19  
% 1.24/1.19  % (11991)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.24/1.19  % (11991)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.24/1.19  % (11991)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.24/1.19  % (11991)------------------------------
% 1.24/1.19  % (11991)------------------------------
% 1.24/1.19  % (11987)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.24/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_11890
% 1.24/1.19  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_11890
% 1.24/1.19  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(func_def_1, type, p: a > $o).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(func_def_9, type, sK0: a > a).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(func_def_10, type, sK1: a).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(func_def_11, type, sK2: a).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(func_def_13, type, ph4: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(func_def_14, type, sK5: a > a).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(func_def_15, type, sK6: a > a).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(func_def_16, type, sK7: a).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(func_def_17, type, sK8: a > a).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f193,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    $false),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f27,f35,f39,f44,f98,f111,f154,f161,f191])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f191,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ~spl3_1 | ~spl3_4 | ~spl3_6),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f190])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f190,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    $false | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_4 | ~spl3_6)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f181])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f181,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    (sK1 != sK1) | ($true = $false) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_4 | ~spl3_6)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f179,f43])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f43,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ((p @ sK1) = $true) | ~spl3_6),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f41])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f41,definition,(
% 1.24/1.19    spl3_6 <=> ((p @ sK1) = $true)),
% 1.24/1.19    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_6])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f179,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((p @ X0) = $false) | (sK1 != X0)) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_4)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f178])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f178,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : ((X0 != X0) | ((p @ X0) = $false) | (sK1 != X0)) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_4)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f165,f174])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f174,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((sK8 @ X0) = X0) | (sK1 != X0)) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_4)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(equality_factoring,[status(thm)],[f171])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f171,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : ((sK1 = (sK8 @ X0)) | ((sK8 @ X0) = X0)) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_4)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f170])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f170,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (($true != $true) | ((sK8 @ X0) = X0) | (sK1 = (sK8 @ X0))) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_4)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f34,f166])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f166,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X2 : a] : (((p @ (sK8 @ X2)) = $true) | ((sK8 @ X2) = X2)) ) | ~spl3_1),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f163])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f163,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X2 : a] : (((X2 = (sK8 @ X2)) = $true) | ((p @ (sK8 @ X2)) = $true)) ) | ~spl3_1),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f162])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f162,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X2 : a] : (((X2 = (sK8 @ X2)) != (p @ (sK8 @ X2)))) ) | ~spl3_1),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f23])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X2 : a] : ((p != (= @ X2))) ) | ~spl3_1),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f22])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f22,definition,(
% 1.24/1.19    spl3_1 <=> ! [X2 : a] : (p != (= @ X2))),
% 1.24/1.19    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f34,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X4 : a] : (($true != (p @ X4)) | (sK1 = X4)) ) | ~spl3_4),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f33])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f33,definition,(
% 1.24/1.19    spl3_4 <=> ! [X4 : a] : (($true != (p @ X4)) | (sK1 = X4))),
% 1.24/1.19    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_4])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f165,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X2 : a] : (((p @ (sK8 @ X2)) = $false) | ((sK8 @ X2) != X2)) ) | ~spl3_1),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f164])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f164,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X2 : a] : (((X2 = (sK8 @ X2)) = $false) | ((p @ (sK8 @ X2)) = $false)) ) | ~spl3_1),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f162])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f161,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ~spl3_6 | ~spl3_8),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f160])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f160,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    $false | (~spl3_6 | ~spl3_8)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f156])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f156,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ($true != $true) | (~spl3_6 | ~spl3_8)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f66,f43])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f66,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((p @ X0) != $true)) ) | ~spl3_8),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f65])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f65,definition,(
% 1.24/1.19    spl3_8 <=> ! [X0 : a] : ((p @ X0) != $true)),
% 1.24/1.19    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_8])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f154,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    spl3_8 | ~spl3_2 | ~spl3_4 | ~spl3_5),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f153,f37,f33,f25,f65])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f25,definition,(
% 1.24/1.19    spl3_2 <=> ! [X0 : a] : (((p @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true) | ((p @ X0) != $true))),
% 1.24/1.19    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f37,definition,(
% 1.24/1.19    spl3_5 <=> ! [X0 : a] : (((p @ X0) != $true) | ((sK0 @ X0) != X0))),
% 1.24/1.19    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_5])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f153,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((p @ X0) != $true)) ) | (~spl3_2 | ~spl3_4 | ~spl3_5)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f151,f34])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f151,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((p @ X0) != $true) | (sK1 != X0)) ) | (~spl3_2 | ~spl3_4 | ~spl3_5)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f150])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f150,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : ((sK1 != X0) | ((p @ X0) != $true) | ((p @ X0) != $true)) ) | (~spl3_2 | ~spl3_4 | ~spl3_5)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f38,f115])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f115,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((sK0 @ X0) = sK1) | ((p @ X0) != $true)) ) | (~spl3_2 | ~spl3_4)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f112])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f112,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((p @ X0) != $true) | ((sK0 @ X0) = sK1) | ($true != $true)) ) | (~spl3_2 | ~spl3_4)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f34,f26])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((p @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true) | ((p @ X0) != $true)) ) | ~spl3_2),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f25])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f38,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((sK0 @ X0) != X0) | ((p @ X0) != $true)) ) | ~spl3_5),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f37])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f111,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ~spl3_2 | ~spl3_3 | ~spl3_5),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f110])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f110,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    $false | (~spl3_2 | ~spl3_3 | ~spl3_5)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f109])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f109,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : ((sK2 != X0)) ) | (~spl3_2 | ~spl3_3 | ~spl3_5)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f107,f48])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f48,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X1 : a] : (((p @ X1) = $true) | (sK2 != X1)) ) | ~spl3_3),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f47])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f47,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X1 : a] : (((sK2 = X1) = $false) | ((p @ X1) = $true)) ) | ~spl3_3),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f45])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f45,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X1 : a] : (((sK2 = X1) = (p @ X1))) ) | ~spl3_3),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f31])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f31,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    (p = (= @ sK2)) | ~spl3_3),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f29])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f29,definition,(
% 1.24/1.19    spl3_3 <=> (p = (= @ sK2))),
% 1.24/1.19    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_3])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f107,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : ((sK2 != X0) | ((p @ X0) != $true)) ) | (~spl3_2 | ~spl3_3 | ~spl3_5)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f106])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f106,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : ((sK2 != X0) | ((p @ X0) != $true) | ((p @ X0) != $true)) ) | (~spl3_2 | ~spl3_3 | ~spl3_5)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f38,f104])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f104,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((sK0 @ X0) = sK2) | ((p @ X0) != $true)) ) | (~spl3_2 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f101])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f101,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (($true = $false) | ((sK0 @ X0) = sK2) | ((p @ X0) != $true)) ) | (~spl3_2 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f26,f49])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f49,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X1 : a] : (((p @ X1) = $false) | (sK2 = X1)) ) | ~spl3_3),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f46])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f46,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X1 : a] : (((p @ X1) = $false) | ((sK2 = X1) = $true)) ) | ~spl3_3),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f45])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f98,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f97])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f97,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    $false | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f96])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f96,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : ((sK2 != X0)) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f95])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f95,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : ((sK2 != X0) | (X0 != X0)) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f94])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f94,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : ((sK2 != X0) | (X0 != X0) | (sK2 != X0)) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f86,f91])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f91,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((sK6 @ X0) = X0) | (sK2 != X0)) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f89])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f89,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : ((sK2 != X0) | ((sK6 @ X0) = X0) | (sK2 != sK2)) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f86,f88])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f88,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : ((sK2 = (sK6 @ X0)) | ((sK6 @ X0) = X0)) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f87])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f87,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((X0 = (sK6 @ X0)) = $true) | (sK2 = (sK6 @ X0))) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f83])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f83,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((sK2 = (sK6 @ X0)) = $true) | ((X0 = (sK6 @ X0)) = $true)) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f80])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f80,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((sK2 = (sK6 @ X0)) != (X0 = (sK6 @ X0)))) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f71])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f71,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((= @ sK2) != (= @ X0))) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f70])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f70,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : ((p != p) | ((= @ sK2) != (= @ X0))) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f23,f31])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f86,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : ((sK2 != (sK6 @ X0)) | ((sK6 @ X0) != X0)) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f85])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f85,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((sK6 @ X0) != X0) | ((sK2 = (sK6 @ X0)) = $false)) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f84])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f84,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((X0 = (sK6 @ X0)) = $false) | ((sK2 = (sK6 @ X0)) = $false)) ) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f80])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    spl3_6 | spl3_3),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f17,f29,f41])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    (p = (= @ sK2)) | ((p @ sK1) = $true)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    (p = ((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0 = Y1)))) @ sK2)) | ((p @ sK1) = $true)),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    (! [X0 : a] : (((p @ X0) != $true) | (((sK0 @ X0) != X0) & ((p @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true))) | ! [X2 : a] : (p != ((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0 = Y1)))) @ X2))) & ((((p @ sK1) = $true) & ! [X4 : a] : ((sK1 = X4) | ($true != (p @ X4)))) | (p = ((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0 = Y1)))) @ sK2)))),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f11,f10,f9])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ! [X0 : a] : (? [X1 : a] : ((X0 != X1) & ((p @ X1) = $true)) => (((sK0 @ X0) != X0) & ((p @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true)))),
% 1.24/1.19    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ? [X3 : a] : (($true = (p @ X3)) & ! [X4 : a] : ((X3 = X4) | ($true != (p @ X4)))) => (((p @ sK1) = $true) & ! [X4 : a] : ((sK1 = X4) | ($true != (p @ X4))))),
% 1.24/1.19    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ? [X5 : a] : (p = ((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0 = Y1)))) @ X5)) => (p = ((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0 = Y1)))) @ sK2))),
% 1.24/1.19    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    (! [X0 : a] : (((p @ X0) != $true) | ? [X1 : a] : ((X0 != X1) & ((p @ X1) = $true))) | ! [X2 : a] : (p != ((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0 = Y1)))) @ X2))) & (? [X3 : a] : (($true = (p @ X3)) & ! [X4 : a] : ((X3 = X4) | ($true != (p @ X4)))) | ? [X5 : a] : (p = ((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0 = Y1)))) @ X5)))),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    (! [X0 : a] : (((p @ X0) != $true) | ? [X1 : a] : ((X0 != X1) & ((p @ X1) = $true))) | ! [X2 : a] : (p != ((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0 = Y1)))) @ X2))) & (? [X0 : a] : (((p @ X0) = $true) & ! [X1 : a] : ((X0 = X1) | ((p @ X1) != $true))) | ? [X2 : a] : (p = ((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0 = Y1)))) @ X2)))),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ? [X2 : a] : (p = ((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0 = Y1)))) @ X2)) <~> ? [X0 : a] : (((p @ X0) = $true) & ! [X1 : a] : ((X0 = X1) | ((p @ X1) != $true)))),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ~(? [X0 : a] : (((p @ X0) = $true) & ! [X1 : a] : (((p @ X1) = $true) => (X0 = X1))) <=> ? [X2 : a] : (p = ((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0 = Y1)))) @ X2)))),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ~(? [X0 : a] : (! [X1 : a] : ((p @ X1) => (X0 = X1)) & (p @ X0)) <=> ? [X2 : a] : (p = ((^[X3 : a, X4 : a] : ((X3 = X4))) @ X2)))),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.24/1.19    ~(? [X0 : a] : (! [X2 : a] : ((p @ X2) => (X0 = X2)) & (p @ X0)) <=> ? [X0 : a] : (p = ((^[X1 : a, X0 : a] : ((X0 = X1))) @ X0)))),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.24/1.19    ? [X0 : a] : (! [X2 : a] : ((p @ X2) => (X0 = X2)) & (p @ X0)) <=> ? [X0 : a] : (p = ((^[X1 : a, X0 : a] : ((X0 = X1))) @ X0))),
% 1.24/1.19    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c6oRckkeWf/DTF2THF_11890.p',cTTTP5306A_pme)).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    spl3_1 | spl3_5),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f18,f37,f22])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X2 : a,X0 : a] : (((p @ X0) != $true) | ((sK0 @ X0) != X0) | (p != (= @ X2))) )),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f16])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X2 : a,X0 : a] : ((p != ((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0 = Y1)))) @ X2)) | ((p @ X0) != $true) | ((sK0 @ X0) != X0)) )),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f35,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    spl3_3 | spl3_4),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f19,f33,f29])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X4 : a] : ((p = (= @ sK2)) | ($true != (p @ X4)) | (sK1 = X4)) )),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X4 : a] : (($true != (p @ X4)) | (sK1 = X4) | (p = ((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0 = Y1)))) @ sK2))) )),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f27,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    spl3_1 | spl3_2),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f20,f25,f22])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X2 : a,X0 : a] : ((p != (= @ X2)) | ((p @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true) | ((p @ X0) != $true)) )),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.24/1.19  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.24/1.19    ( ! [X2 : a,X0 : a] : (((p @ X0) != $true) | ((p @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true) | (p != ((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0 = Y1)))) @ X2))) )),
% 1.24/1.19    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.24/1.19  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_11890
% 1.24/1.19  % (11987)------------------------------
% 1.24/1.19  % (11987)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.24/1.19  % (11987)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.24/1.19  
% 1.24/1.19  % (11987)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.24/1.19  % (11987)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 1.24/1.19  % (11987)Instructions burned: 11 (million)
% 1.24/1.19  % (11987)------------------------------
% 1.24/1.19  % (11987)------------------------------
% 1.24/1.19  % (11986)Success in time 0.016 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------