%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SEV409^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:36:34 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.09s 0.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 1 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 50 ( 3 ~; 2 |; 5 &; 36 @)
% ( 2 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 20 ( 20 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 ^; 8 !; 2 ?; 10 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
epred1_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
epred2_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_25,type,
esk1_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i ).
thf(cTHM120_BUG_pme,conjecture,
? [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
! [X2: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
& ( X1 @ X3 @ X2 ) )
=> ! [X4: $i] :
( ( X2 @ X4 )
<=> ( X3 @ X4 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.756qKlsQVp/E---3.1_3025532.p',cTHM120_BUG_pme) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
! [X2: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
& ( X1 @ X3 @ X2 ) )
=> ! [X4: $i] :
( ( X2 @ X4 )
<=> ( X3 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM120_BUG_pme]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X9: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( X9 @ ( epred1_1 @ X9 ) @ ( epred2_1 @ X9 ) )
& ( X9 @ ( epred2_1 @ X9 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X9 ) )
& ( ~ ( epred1_1 @ X9 @ ( esk1_1 @ X9 ) )
| ~ ( epred2_1 @ X9 @ ( esk1_1 @ X9 ) ) )
& ( ( epred1_1 @ X9 @ ( esk1_1 @ X9 ) )
| ( epred2_1 @ X9 @ ( esk1_1 @ X9 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] : ( X1 @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred2_1 @ X1 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(flex_resolve,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEV409^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.18 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:45:57 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.23 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.24 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.756qKlsQVp/E---3.1_3025532.p
% 0.09/0.27 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.09/0.27 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.09/0.27 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.27 % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.09/0.27 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27 % Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27 % full_lambda_6 with pid 3025573 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.27 % Result found by full_lambda_6
% 0.09/0.27 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.09/0.27 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.27 % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.09/0.27 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.09/0.27 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.09/0.27 % Search class: HGHNS-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN
% 0.09/0.27 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.27 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3025576 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.27 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.09/0.27 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.09/0.27 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.27 % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.09/0.27 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.09/0.27 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.09/0.27 % Search class: HGHNS-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN
% 0.09/0.27 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.27 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.09/0.27
% 0.09/0.27 % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.27 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.09/0.27 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.27 % Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.09/0.27 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % Initial clauses : 4
% 0.09/0.27 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.09/0.27 % Processed clauses : 1
% 0.09/0.27 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % NegExts : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.09/0.27 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.28 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.28 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.28 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.28 % Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.09/0.28 % ...number of literals in the above : 5
% 0.09/0.28 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Termbank termtop insertions : 270
% 0.09/0.28 % Search garbage collected termcells : 102
% 0.09/0.28
% 0.09/0.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.09/0.28 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.09/0.28 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.09/0.28 % Maximum resident set size: 3888 pages
% 0.09/0.28
% 0.09/0.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.09/0.28 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.09/0.28 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.09/0.28 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.09/0.28 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------