↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEV412^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:38:36 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.28s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   54 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  409 (  98 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  263 (  58   ~;  71   |;  16   &;  86   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  28  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  10 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   0 sgn  17   !;   6   ?;  23   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    cG: $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    cB: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    cA: $i > $o ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ( ! [X0: $i] :
            ( ( cA @ X0 )
           => ( cB @ X0 ) )
       => cG )
      | ( ! [X0: $i] :
            ( ( cA @ X0 )
           => ( cB @ X0 ) )
       => cG ) )
   => ( ! [X0: $i] :
          ( ( cA @ X0 )
         => ( cB @ X0 ) )
     => cG ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cDUAL_EG2_pme) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ( ! [X0: $i] :
              ( ( cA @ X0 )
             => ( cB @ X0 ) )
         => cG )
        | ( ! [X0: $i] :
              ( ( cA @ X0 )
             => ( cB @ X0 ) )
         => cG ) )
     => ( ! [X0: $i] :
            ( ( cA @ X0 )
           => ( cB @ X0 ) )
       => cG ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( ! [X0: $i] :
              ( ( cA @ X0 )
             => ( cB @ X0 ) )
         => cG )
        | ( ! [X1: $i] :
              ( ( cA @ X1 )
             => ( cB @ X1 ) )
         => cG ) )
     => ( ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( cA @ X2 )
           => ( cB @ X2 ) )
       => cG ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( ! [X1: $i] :
              ( ( $true
                = ( cA @ X1 ) )
             => ( $true
                = ( cB @ X1 ) ) )
         => ( cG = $true ) )
        | ( ! [X0: $i] :
              ( ( ( cA @ X0 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( cB @ X0 )
                = $true ) )
         => ( cG = $true ) ) )
     => ( ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( $true
              = ( cA @ X2 ) )
           => ( $true
              = ( cB @ X2 ) ) )
       => ( cG = $true ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( ( cG != $true )
    & ! [X2: $i] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( cA @ X2 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( cB @ X2 ) ) )
    & ( ( cG = $true )
      | ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( cB @ X1 ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( cA @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( cG = $true )
      | ? [X0: $i] :
          ( ( ( cB @ X0 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( cA @ X0 )
            = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( cB @ X1 ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( cA @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( cG = $true )
      | ( cG = $true )
      | ? [X0: $i] :
          ( ( ( cB @ X0 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( cA @ X0 )
            = $true ) ) )
    & ( cG != $true )
    & ! [X2: $i] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( cA @ X2 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( cB @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ( ? [X0: $i] :
          ( ( ( cB @ X0 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( cA @ X0 )
            = $true ) )
      | ( cG = $true )
      | ( cG = $true )
      | ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( cB @ X1 ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( cA @ X1 ) ) ) )
    & ( cG != $true )
    & ! [X2: $i] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( cA @ X2 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( cB @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( ( ( $true
         != ( cB @ sK0 ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( cA @ sK0 ) ) )
      | ( cG = $true )
      | ( cG = $true )
      | ( ( $true
         != ( cB @ sK1 ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( cA @ sK1 ) ) ) )
    & ( cG != $true )
    & ! [X2: $i] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( cA @ X2 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( cB @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( cA @ X2 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( cB @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    cG != $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK1 ) )
    | ( cG = $true )
    | ( cG = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( cB @ sK1 ) )
    | ( cG = $true )
    | ( cG = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cB @ sK0 ) )
    | ( cG = $true )
    | ( cG = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cB @ sK0 ) )
    | ( cG = $true )
    | ( $true
     != ( cB @ sK1 ) )
    | ( cG = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( cG = $true )
    | ( $true
     != ( cB @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( cB @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK1 ) )
    | ( cG = $true ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cB @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK1 ) )
    | ( cG = $true ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cB @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK0 ) )
    | ( cG = $true ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cB @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( cB @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f17,f10]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f18,f10]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( cB @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f19,f10]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( cB @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f20,f10]) ).

thf(f26,definition,
    ( spl2_1
  <=> ( $true
      = ( cB @ sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cB @ sK0 ) )
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f30,definition,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> ( $true
      = ( cB @ sK1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cB @ sK1 ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f21,f30,f26]) ).

thf(f35,definition,
    ( spl2_3
  <=> ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK0 ) )
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f35]) ).

thf(f39,definition,
    ( spl2_4
  <=> ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cA @ sK1 ) )
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f39]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f22,f39,f35]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f23,f39,f26]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f24,f35,f30]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cB @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f9,f37]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cB @ sK0 ) )
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f45]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f46,f28]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f47]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cB @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f9,f41]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cB @ sK1 ) )
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f49]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f50,f32]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f51]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f33]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f42]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f43]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | spl2_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f44]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f48]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    ( spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f52]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    spl2_3,
    inference(rat,[],[s6,s2,s4]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    spl2_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s5,s7]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    spl2_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s3,s8]) ).

cnf(s10,plain,
    ~ spl2_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s8]) ).

cnf(s11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s6,s9,s10]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEV412^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.19  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:40:37 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.20  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.28  % (488056)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.22/0.28  % (488064)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=2788372384:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.22/0.28  % (488064) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-488056-488064"...
% 0.22/0.28  % (488064)...printing done.
% 0.22/0.28  % (488064)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.28  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.28  % (488064)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.28  % (488064)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.22/0.28  % (488064)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.22/0.28  % (488064)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.22/0.28  % (488064)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.28  % (488064)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.28  % (488064)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.22/0.28  % (488064)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.28  % (488056)Success in time 0.027 s
% 0.22/0.28  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------