↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEV432^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:41:14 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.62s 1.32s
% Output   : Refutation 1.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (  16 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   57 (  10   ~;   1   |;   0   &;  44   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   4   ^;  14   !;   7   ?;  25   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    f: a > b ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK0: ( b > a ) > b ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK1: b > a ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    ph3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: b > b] :
      ( ( sK0
        @ ^ [Y0: b] : ( sK1 @ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
     != ( X0
        @ ( sK0
          @ ^ [Y0: b] : ( sK1 @ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X0: b > b,X1: b] :
      ( ( ( sK0
          @ ^ [Y0: b] : ( sK1 @ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
       != X1 )
      | ( ( X0
          @ ( sK0
            @ ^ [Y0: b] : ( sK1 @ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
       != X1 ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: b] :
      ( ( f @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
      = X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X0: b] :
      ( ( f @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
      = X0 ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1])],[f1,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X0: b] :
      ( ? [X1: a] :
          ( ( f @ X1 )
          = X0 )
     => ( ( f @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
        = X0 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0: b] :
    ? [X1: a] :
      ( ( f @ X1 )
      = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JClVO5wJXo/DTF2THF_8969.p',fsurj) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: b > a] :
      ( ( f @ ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
     != ( sK0 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ! [X0: b > a] :
      ( ( f @ ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
     != ( sK0 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f6,f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ! [X0: b > a] :
      ( ? [X1: b] :
          ( ( f @ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
         != X1 )
     => ( ( f @ ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
       != ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ! [X0: b > a] :
    ? [X1: b] :
      ( ( f @ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
     != X1 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ? [X0: b > a] :
      ! [X1: b] :
        ( ( f @ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
        = X1 ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X2: b > a] :
      ! [X1: b] :
        ( ( f @ ( X2 @ X1 ) )
        = X1 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ? [X2: b > a] :
    ! [X1: b] :
      ( ( f @ ( X2 @ X1 ) )
      = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JClVO5wJXo/DTF2THF_8969.p',invexists) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEV432^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:45:11 EST 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.19/0.45  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.19/0.45  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.19/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.45  % File     : SEV432^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.19/0.45  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.19/0.45  % Problem  : Surjective functions f:A->B have right inverses
% 0.19/0.45  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.19/0.45  % English  :
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  % Refs     : [Bro11] Brown (2011), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.45  % Source   : [Bro11]
% 0.19/0.45  % Names    : INVEXISTS5 [Bro11]
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.19/0.45  % Rating   : 0.33 v9.1.0, 0.25 v9.0.0, 0.30 v8.2.0, 0.31 v8.1.0, 0.27 v7.5.0, 0.14 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.43 v6.1.0, 0.14 v6.0.0, 0.29 v5.5.0, 0.33 v5.4.0, 0.40 v5.2.0
% 0.19/0.45  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   2 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Number of atoms       :    2 (   2 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Number of connectives :    3 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   3   @)
% 0.19/0.45  %                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   3 avg)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Number of types       :    2 (   2 usr)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Number of type conns  :    2 (   2   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Number of symbols     :    2 (   1 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   2   !;   2   ?;   4   :)
% 0.19/0.45  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  % Comments : 
% 0.19/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.45  thf(a,type,
% 0.19/0.45      a: $tType ).
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  thf(b,type,
% 0.19/0.45      b: $tType ).
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  thf(f,type,
% 0.19/0.45      f: a > b ).
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  thf(fsurj,axiom,
% 0.19/0.45      ! [Y: b] :
% 0.19/0.45      ? [X: a] :
% 0.19/0.45        ( ( f @ X )
% 0.19/0.45        = Y ) ).
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  thf(invexists,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.45      ? [G: b > a] :
% 0.19/0.45      ! [X: b] :
% 0.19/0.45        ( ( f @ ( G @ X ) )
% 0.19/0.45        = X ) ).
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.45  ------------------------
% 1.45/1.28  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.45/1.28  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.45/1.28  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:45:12 EST 2026
% 1.45/1.28  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.45/1.28  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.45/1.28  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.45/1.28  
% 1.45/1.28  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JClVO5wJXo/DTF2DTF8969.p
% See solution above
% 1.45/1.28  ------------------------
% 1.45/1.29  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.45/1.29  thf(a,type,
% 1.45/1.29      a: $tType ).
% 1.45/1.29  
% 1.45/1.29  thf(b,type,
% 1.45/1.29      b: $tType ).
% 1.45/1.29  
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f,type,
% 1.45/1.29      f: a > b ).
% 1.45/1.29  
% 1.45/1.29  thf(fsurj,axiom,
% 1.45/1.29      ! [Y: b] :
% 1.45/1.29      ? [X: a] :
% 1.45/1.29        ( ( f @ X )
% 1.45/1.29        = Y ) ).
% 1.45/1.29  
% 1.45/1.29  thf(invexists,conjecture,
% 1.45/1.29      ? [G: b > a] :
% 1.45/1.29      ! [X: b] :
% 1.45/1.29        ( ( f @ ( G @ X ) )
% 1.45/1.29        = X ) ).
% 1.45/1.29  ------------------------
% 1.62/1.31  % (9178)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_8969 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.62/1.31  % (9178)First to succeed.
% 1.62/1.32  % (9178)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.62/1.32  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_8969
% 1.62/1.32  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_8969
% 1.62/1.32  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(type_def_6, type, b: $tType).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(func_def_1, type, b: $tType).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(func_def_2, type, f: a > b).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(func_def_6, type, sK0: (b > a) > b).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(func_def_7, type, sK1: b > a).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(func_def_9, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    $false),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ( ! [X0 : b > b] : (((sK0 @ (^[Y0 : b]: (sK1 @ (X0 @ Y0)))) != (X0 @ (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : b]: (sK1 @ (X0 @ Y0))))))) )),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ( ! [X0 : b > b,X1 : b] : (((sK0 @ (^[Y0 : b]: (sK1 @ (X0 @ Y0)))) != X1) | ((X0 @ (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : b]: (sK1 @ (X0 @ Y0))))) != X1)) )),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f12])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ( ! [X0 : b] : (((f @ (sK1 @ X0)) = X0)) )),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ! [X0 : b] : ((f @ (sK1 @ X0)) = X0)),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1])],[f1,f9])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ! [X0 : b] : (? [X1 : a] : ((f @ X1) = X0) => ((f @ (sK1 @ X0)) = X0))),
% 1.62/1.32    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.62/1.32    ! [X0 : b] : ? [X1 : a] : ((f @ X1) = X0)),
% 1.62/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JClVO5wJXo/DTF2THF_8969.p',fsurj)).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ( ! [X0 : b > a] : (((f @ (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))) != (sK0 @ X0))) )),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ! [X0 : b > a] : ((f @ (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))) != (sK0 @ X0))),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f6,f7])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ! [X0 : b > a] : (? [X1 : b] : ((f @ (X0 @ X1)) != X1) => ((f @ (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))) != (sK0 @ X0)))),
% 1.62/1.32    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ! [X0 : b > a] : ? [X1 : b] : ((f @ (X0 @ X1)) != X1)),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ~? [X0 : b > a] : ! [X1 : b] : ((f @ (X0 @ X1)) = X1)),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f3,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.62/1.32    ~? [X2 : b > a] : ! [X1 : b] : ((f @ (X2 @ X1)) = X1)),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f2,conjecture,(
% 1.62/1.32    ? [X2 : b > a] : ! [X1 : b] : ((f @ (X2 @ X1)) = X1)),
% 1.62/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JClVO5wJXo/DTF2THF_8969.p',invexists)).
% 1.62/1.32  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_8969
% 1.62/1.32  % (9178)------------------------------
% 1.62/1.32  % (9178)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.62/1.32  % (9178)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.62/1.32  
% 1.62/1.32  % (9178)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.62/1.32  % (9178)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.62/1.32  % (9178)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.62/1.32  % (9178)------------------------------
% 1.62/1.32  % (9178)------------------------------
% 1.62/1.32  % (9177)Success in time 0.017 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------