↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEV445^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:37:18 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.74s 2.27s
% Output   : Refutation 4.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   39 (  10 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   56 (   7   ~;   1   |;   0   &;  48   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   6   ^;  22   !;   0   ?;  29   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   1  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(skt1_type,type,
    skt1: $tType ).

thf('const/sets/UNIV_decl',type,
    'const/sets/UNIV': 
      !>[TA: $tType] : ( TA > $o ) ).

thf('const/sets/IN_decl',type,
    'const/sets/IN': 
      !>[TA: $tType] : ( TA > ( TA > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: skt1 ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: skt1] :
          ~ ( 'const/sets/IN' @ skt1 @ A @ ( 'const/sets/UNIV' @ skt1 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [TA: $tType] :
      ( ( 'const/sets/UNIV' @ TA )
      = ( ^ [A: TA] : $true ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','thm/sets/UNIV_') ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType] :
      ( ( 'const/sets/UNIV' @ TA )
      = ( ^ [A: TA] : $true ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType] :
      ( ( 'const/sets/UNIV' @ TA )
      = ( ^ [A: TA] : $true ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[7]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType] :
      ( ( 'const/sets/UNIV' @ TA )
      = ( ^ [A: TA] : $true ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: TA] : ( 'const/sets/IN' @ TA @ A @ ( 'const/sets/UNIV' @ TA ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','thm/sets/IN_UNIV_') ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [TA: $tType,A: TA] : ( 'const/sets/IN' @ TA @ A @ ( 'const/sets/UNIV' @ TA ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ~ ! [TA: $tType,A: TA] : ( 'const/sets/IN' @ TA @ A @ ( 'const/sets/UNIV' @ TA ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ~ ( 'const/sets/IN' @ skt1 @ sk1 @ ( 'const/sets/UNIV' @ skt1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[5]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ~ ( 'const/sets/IN' @ skt1 @ sk1
        @ ^ [A: skt1] : $true )
    | ( ( 'const/sets/UNIV' @ skt1 )
     != ( 'const/sets/UNIV' @ skt1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[9,6]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ~ ( 'const/sets/IN' @ skt1 @ sk1
      @ ^ [A: skt1] : $true ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[14:[]]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: TA > $o,B: TA] :
      ( ( 'const/sets/IN' @ TA @ B @ A )
      = ( A @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','thm/sets/IN_') ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: TA > $o,B: TA] :
      ( ( 'const/sets/IN' @ TA @ B @ A )
      = ( A @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,B: TA,A: TA > $o] :
      ( ( 'const/sets/IN' @ TA @ B @ A )
      = ( A @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[10]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,B: TA,A: TA > $o] :
      ( ( 'const/sets/IN' @ TA @ B @ A )
      = ( A @ B ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[15,12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEV445^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.20  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:47:15 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.03/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.22/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (180ms). 
% 1.22/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.83/1.40  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.02/1.40  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.02/1.46  % [INFO] 	 No direction of definition thm/sets/UNIV_ detected. Treating as axiom ... 
% 2.02/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 2 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.19/1.53  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 2 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.19/1.53  % [INFO] 	 No direction of definition thm/sets/UNIV_ detected. Treating as axiom ... 
% 2.19/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.19/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.19/1.55  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.74/2.27  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.74/2.27  % Time passed: 1916ms (effective reasoning time: 1267ms)
% 3.74/2.27  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.74/2.27  % Axioms used in derivation (2): thm/sets/UNIV_, thm/sets/IN_
% 3.74/2.27  % No. of inferences in proof: 15
% 3.74/2.27  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1916 ms resp. 1267 ms w/o parsing
% 4.02/2.32  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.02/2.32  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------