%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : SEV516+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v7.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n122.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Jan 18 14:57:26 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 23.40s % Output : FiniteModel 23.40s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEV516+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v7.0.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n122.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 00:38:34 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime : % 23.40/9.64 Nitpicking formula... % 23.40/9.64 Timestamp: 00:38:42 % 23.40/9.64 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 23.40/9.64 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 23.40/9.64 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 23.40/9.64 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 23.40/9.64 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 23.40/9.64 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 23.40/9.64 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 23.40/9.64 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 23.40/9.64 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 23.40/9.64 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2: % 23.40/9.64 % 23.40/9.64 Skolem constants: % 23.40/9.64 A = i1 % 23.40/9.64 \<lambda>A. B = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2) % 23.40/9.64 \<lambda>A. B = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2) % 23.40/9.64 \<lambda>A B. C = % 23.40/9.64 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.40/9.64 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2), % 23.40/9.64 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2)) % 23.40/9.64 \<lambda>B. C = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1) % 23.40/9.64 D = i1 % 23.40/9.64 D = i1 % 23.40/9.64 \<lambda>D. E = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1) % 23.40/9.64 Constants: % 23.40/9.64 bnd_g_both = % 23.40/9.64 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.40/9.64 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False), % 23.40/9.64 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True)) % 23.40/9.64 bnd_g_false = % 23.40/9.64 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.40/9.64 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True), % 23.40/9.64 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True)) % 23.40/9.64 bnd_g_false_only = % 23.40/9.64 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.40/9.64 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True), % 23.40/9.64 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)) % 23.40/9.64 bnd_g_true = % 23.40/9.64 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.40/9.64 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False), % 23.40/9.64 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True)) % 23.40/9.64 bnd_g_true_only = % 23.40/9.64 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.40/9.64 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False), % 23.40/9.64 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False)) % 23.40/9.64 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 23.40/9.64 Total time: 885 ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------