↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : SEV517+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:48:51 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 22.35s 4.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 22.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEV517+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 11:06:18 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 22.35/4.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 22.35/4.30  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 22.35/4.30  fof(difference, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : ((member(X0,difference(X2,X1)) <=> (member(X0,X2) & ~member(X0,X1))))).
% 22.35/4.30  fof(singleton, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((member(X0,singleton(X1)) <=> X0 = X1))).
% 22.35/4.30  fof(partition, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((partition(X0,X1) <=> (! [X2] : ((member(X2,X0) => subset(X2,X1))) & (! [X2] : ((member(X2,X1) => ? [X3] : ((member(X3,X0) & member(X2,X3))))) & ! [X2] : ! [X3] : (((member(X2,X0) & member(X3,X0)) => (? [X4] : ((member(X4,X2) & member(X4,X3))) => X2 = X3)))))))).
% 22.35/4.30  fof(diff_elem_in_partition, conjecture, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : ! [X3] : (((member(X0,difference(X1,X2)) & partition(X3,X1)) => ? [X4] : ((member(X4,difference(X3,singleton(X2))) & member(X0,X4)))))).
% 22.35/4.30  fof(negated_conjecture, negated_conjecture, ~! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : ! [X3] : (((member(X0,difference(X1,X2)) & partition(X3,X1)) => ? [X4] : ((member(X4,difference(X3,singleton(X2))) & member(X0,X4))))), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], [diff_elem_in_partition])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(c29, plain, ~member(X0,difference(X1,X2)) | member(X0,X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [difference])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(c30, plain, ~member(X0,difference(X1,X2)) | ~member(X0,X2), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [difference])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(c31, plain, member(X0,difference(X1,X2)) | ~member(X0,X1) | member(X0,X2), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [difference])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(c32, plain, ~member(X0,singleton(X1)) | X0 = X1, inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [singleton])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(c46, plain, ~partition(X0,X1) | X2(X0,X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [partition])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(c55, plain, ~X0(X1,X2) | ~member(X3,X2) | member(sK62(X1,X3),X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [partition])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(c56, plain, ~X0(X1,X2) | ~member(X3,X2) | member(X3,sK62(X1,X3)), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [partition])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(c93, plain, member(sK97,difference(sK98,sK99)), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(c94, plain, partition(sK100,sK98), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(c95, plain, ~member(X0,difference(sK100,singleton(sK99))) | ~member(sK97,X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(d0, plain, 'Ts51'(sK100,sK98), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c46,c94])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(d1, plain, ~member(X0,sK98) | member(X0,sK62(sK100,X0)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c56,d0])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(d2, plain, ~member(X0,sK98) | member(sK62(sK100,X0),sK100), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c55,d0])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(d3, plain, member(X0,singleton(sK99)) | ~member(X0,sK100) | ~member(sK97,X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c31,c95])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(d4, plain, ~member(X0,sK100) | ~member(sK97,X0) | X0 = sK99, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d3,c32])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(d5, plain, ~member(sK97,sK98) | sK62(sK100,sK97) = sK99 | ~member(sK62(sK100,sK97),sK100), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d1,d4])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(d6, plain, member(sK97,sK98), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c29,c93])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(d7, plain, sK62(sK100,sK97) = sK99 | ~member(sK62(sK100,sK97),sK100), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d6,d5])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(d8, plain, sK62(sK100,sK97) = sK99 | ~member(sK97,sK98), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d7,d2])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(d9, plain, sK62(sK100,sK97) = sK99, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d6,d8])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(d10, plain, member(sK97,sK99) | ~member(sK97,sK98), inference(superposition, [status(thm)], [d9,d1])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(d11, plain, member(sK97,sK99), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d6,d10])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(d12, plain, ~member(sK97,sK99), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c30,c93])).
% 22.35/4.30  cnf(d13, plain, $false, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d12,d11])).
% 22.35/4.30  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------