↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SEV582+1 : TPTP v9.1.0. Released v9.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr  1 02:02:57 AM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 10.53s 2.20s
% Output   : Proof 12.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEV582+1 : TPTP v9.1.0. Released v9.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Mar 31 13:17:11 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.67/0.63  ________       _____
% 0.67/0.63  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.67/0.63  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.67/0.63  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.67/0.63  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.67/0.63  
% 0.67/0.63  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.67/0.63  (2023-06-19)
% 0.67/0.63  
% 0.67/0.63  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.67/0.63  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.67/0.63                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.67/0.63  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.67/0.63  
% 0.67/0.63  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.67/0.63  
% 0.67/0.63  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.71/0.65  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.71/0.67  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.71/0.67  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.71/0.67  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.71/0.67  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.71/0.67  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.71/0.67  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.71/0.67  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.85/1.12  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.85/1.13  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.34/1.16  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.34/1.16  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 3.34/1.16  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.34/1.16  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.34/1.16  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 6.73/1.64  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 6.73/1.65  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 7.18/1.69  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 7.18/1.71  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.18/1.74  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.93/1.79  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.17/1.83  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 8.91/1.93  Prover 3: gave up
% 8.91/1.96  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 8.91/1.97  Prover 1: gave up
% 8.91/1.97  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 9.42/2.02  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 9.42/2.02  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 10.53/2.14  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 10.53/2.16  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.53/2.19  Prover 0: proved (1537ms)
% 10.53/2.19  
% 10.53/2.20  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.53/2.20  
% 10.53/2.20  Prover 5: stopped
% 10.53/2.20  Prover 6: stopped
% 10.53/2.21  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 10.53/2.21  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 10.53/2.21  Prover 2: stopped
% 11.15/2.22  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.15/2.22  Prover 16: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 11.15/2.22  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 11.15/2.22  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.15/2.25  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 11.15/2.25  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 11.15/2.27  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 11.69/2.30  Prover 4: Found proof (size 118)
% 11.69/2.30  Prover 4: proved (1636ms)
% 11.69/2.30  Prover 8: stopped
% 11.69/2.30  Prover 7: stopped
% 11.69/2.30  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.69/2.30  Prover 11: stopped
% 11.69/2.31  Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 11.69/2.31  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.69/2.32  Prover 10: stopped
% 11.69/2.33  Prover 16: stopped
% 11.69/2.34  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.69/2.35  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.69/2.36  Prover 13: stopped
% 11.69/2.36  
% 11.69/2.36  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.69/2.36  
% 12.20/2.38  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 12.20/2.39  Assumptions after simplification:
% 12.20/2.39  ---------------------------------
% 12.20/2.39  
% 12.20/2.39    (a_def)
% 12.35/2.42     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (u(v0, v2) = v3) |
% 12.35/2.42       ~ (s(v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | (a(v0, v1) = v3 & $i(v3))) &  !
% 12.35/2.42    [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (a(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 12.35/2.42      $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] : (u(v0, v3) = v2 & s(v1) = v3 & $i(v3) & $i(v2)))
% 12.35/2.42  
% 12.35/2.42    (n_def)
% 12.35/2.42     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (n(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | (a(v0, v0) = v1 &
% 12.35/2.42        $i(v1))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (a(v0, v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 12.35/2.42      (n(v0) = v1 & $i(v1)))
% 12.35/2.42  
% 12.35/2.42    (s_ax)
% 12.35/2.43     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (s(v0) = v1) |  ~
% 12.35/2.43      (mem(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 12.35/2.43    (v1 = v0 |  ~ (s(v1) = v2) |  ~ (mem(v0, v2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 12.35/2.43  
% 12.35/2.43    (subq_402_33170)
% 12.45/2.43    $i(e) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] : 
% 12.45/2.43    ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i] :  ? [v7: $i] :  ? [v8: $i] :  ? [v9: $i] :  ? [v10:
% 12.45/2.43      $i] :  ? [v11: $i] :  ? [v12: $i] :  ? [v13: $i] :  ? [v14: $i] :  ? [v15:
% 12.45/2.43      $i] :  ? [v16: $i] :  ? [v17: $i] :  ? [v18: int] : ( ~ (v18 = 0) & p(v7) =
% 12.45/2.43      v15 & n(v1) = v4 & n(v0) = v7 & n(e) = v0 & a(v12, v8) = v13 & a(v3, v5) =
% 12.45/2.43      v6 & a(v1, v15) = v16 & a(v1, v2) = v3 & u(v14, v16) = v17 & u(v11, v13) =
% 12.45/2.43      v14 & u(v6, v9) = v10 & u(v0, v4) = v5 & s(v8) = v9 & s(v7) = v8 & s(v5) =
% 12.45/2.43      v11 & s(v2) = v12 & s(v1) = v2 & s(v0) = v1 & subq(v10, v17) = v18 & $i(v17)
% 12.45/2.43      & $i(v16) & $i(v15) & $i(v14) & $i(v13) & $i(v12) & $i(v11) & $i(v10) &
% 12.45/2.43      $i(v9) & $i(v8) & $i(v7) & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) &
% 12.45/2.43      $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.45/2.43  
% 12.45/2.43    (subq_def)
% 12.45/2.44     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~
% 12.45/2.44      (subq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (mem(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.44      $i(v0) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & mem(v2, v0) = v4)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 12.45/2.44    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subq(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.44      $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & mem(v3, v1) = v4 &
% 12.45/2.44        mem(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~
% 12.45/2.44      (subq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (mem(v2, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.44      $i(v0) | mem(v2, v1) = 0)
% 12.45/2.44  
% 12.45/2.44    (u_ax)
% 12.45/2.44     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] : (v4 = 0
% 12.45/2.44      |  ~ (u(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (mem(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.44      $i(v0) |  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: int] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v5 = 0) & mem(v0,
% 12.45/2.44          v2) = v6 & mem(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i]
% 12.45/2.44    :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (u(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (mem(v0, v3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 12.45/2.44      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] : (mem(v0, v2) = v5 &
% 12.45/2.44        mem(v0, v1) = v4 & (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 12.45/2.44  
% 12.45/2.44    (function-axioms)
% 12.45/2.45     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (a(v3,
% 12.45/2.45          v2) = v1) |  ~ (a(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2:
% 12.45/2.45      $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (m(v3, v2) = v0)) & 
% 12.45/2.45    ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (u(v3,
% 12.45/2.45          v2) = v1) |  ~ (u(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (disj(v3, v2)
% 12.45/2.45        = v1) |  ~ (disj(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subq(v3, v2)
% 12.45/2.45        = v1) |  ~ (subq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (mem(v3, v2)
% 12.45/2.45        = v1) |  ~ (mem(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (atleast16p(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.45      (atleast16p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (atleast15p(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.45      (atleast15p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (atleast14p(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.45      (atleast14p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (atleast13p(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.45      (atleast13p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (atleast12p(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.45      (atleast12p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (atleast11p(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.45      (atleast11p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (atleast10p(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.45      (atleast10p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (atleast9p(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.45      (atleast9p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (atleast8p(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.45      (atleast8p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (atleast7p(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.45      (atleast7p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (atleast6p(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.45      (atleast6p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (atleast5p(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.45      (atleast5p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (atleast4p(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.45      (atleast4p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (atleast3p(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.45      (atleast3p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.45/2.45      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (atleast2p(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.45/2.45      (atleast2p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |
% 12.45/2.45       ~ (p(v2) = v1) |  ~ (p(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i]
% 12.45/2.45    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (n(v2) = v1) |  ~ (n(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : 
% 12.45/2.45    ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (s(v2) = v1) |  ~ (s(v2) = v0))
% 12.45/2.45  
% 12.45/2.45  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 12.45/2.45  --------------------------------------------
% 12.45/2.45  atleast10p_def, atleast11p_def, atleast12p_def, atleast13p_def, atleast14p_def,
% 12.45/2.45  atleast15p_def, atleast16p_def, atleast2p_def, atleast3p_def, atleast4p_def,
% 12.45/2.45  atleast5p_def, atleast6p_def, atleast7p_def, atleast8p_def, atleast9p_def,
% 12.45/2.45  disj_def, e_ax, m_ax, p_ax, setext
% 12.45/2.45  
% 12.45/2.45  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 12.45/2.45  ---------------------------------
% 12.45/2.45  
% 12.45/2.45  Begin of proof
% 12.45/2.45  | 
% 12.45/2.45  | ALPHA: (subq_def) implies:
% 12.45/2.45  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subq(v0, v1) =
% 12.45/2.45  |            v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4
% 12.45/2.45  |              = 0) & mem(v3, v1) = v4 & mem(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3)))
% 12.45/2.45  | 
% 12.45/2.45  | ALPHA: (s_ax) implies:
% 12.45/2.45  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (s(v1) = v2) | 
% 12.45/2.45  |          ~ (mem(v0, v2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 12.45/2.45  | 
% 12.45/2.45  | ALPHA: (u_ax) implies:
% 12.45/2.45  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (u(v1, v2)
% 12.45/2.45  |            = v3) |  ~ (mem(v0, v3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | 
% 12.45/2.45  |          ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] : (mem(v0, v2) = v5 & mem(v0, v1) = v4 &
% 12.45/2.45  |            (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 12.45/2.46  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] :
% 12.45/2.46  |        (v4 = 0 |  ~ (u(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (mem(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 12.45/2.46  |          $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: int] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~
% 12.45/2.46  |            (v5 = 0) & mem(v0, v2) = v6 & mem(v0, v1) = v5))
% 12.45/2.46  | 
% 12.45/2.46  | ALPHA: (a_def) implies:
% 12.45/2.46  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (a(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~
% 12.45/2.46  |          $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] : (u(v0, v3) = v2 & s(v1) = v3 &
% 12.45/2.46  |            $i(v3) & $i(v2)))
% 12.45/2.46  | 
% 12.45/2.46  | ALPHA: (n_def) implies:
% 12.45/2.46  |   (6)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (n(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | (a(v0, v0) =
% 12.45/2.46  |            v1 & $i(v1)))
% 12.45/2.46  | 
% 12.45/2.46  | ALPHA: (subq_402_33170) implies:
% 12.45/2.46  |   (7)  $i(e)
% 12.45/2.46  |   (8)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] : 
% 12.45/2.46  |        ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i] :  ? [v7: $i] :  ? [v8: $i] :  ? [v9: $i] :  ?
% 12.45/2.46  |        [v10: $i] :  ? [v11: $i] :  ? [v12: $i] :  ? [v13: $i] :  ? [v14: $i] :
% 12.45/2.46  |         ? [v15: $i] :  ? [v16: $i] :  ? [v17: $i] :  ? [v18: int] : ( ~ (v18 =
% 12.45/2.46  |            0) & p(v7) = v15 & n(v1) = v4 & n(v0) = v7 & n(e) = v0 & a(v12, v8)
% 12.45/2.46  |          = v13 & a(v3, v5) = v6 & a(v1, v15) = v16 & a(v1, v2) = v3 & u(v14,
% 12.45/2.46  |            v16) = v17 & u(v11, v13) = v14 & u(v6, v9) = v10 & u(v0, v4) = v5 &
% 12.45/2.46  |          s(v8) = v9 & s(v7) = v8 & s(v5) = v11 & s(v2) = v12 & s(v1) = v2 &
% 12.45/2.46  |          s(v0) = v1 & subq(v10, v17) = v18 & $i(v17) & $i(v16) & $i(v15) &
% 12.45/2.46  |          $i(v14) & $i(v13) & $i(v12) & $i(v11) & $i(v10) & $i(v9) & $i(v8) &
% 12.45/2.46  |          $i(v7) & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) &
% 12.45/2.46  |          $i(v0))
% 12.45/2.46  | 
% 12.45/2.46  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 12.45/2.46  |   (9)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (s(v2) = v1) | 
% 12.45/2.46  |          ~ (s(v2) = v0))
% 12.45/2.46  |   (10)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i]
% 12.45/2.46  |         :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (mem(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (mem(v3, v2) =
% 12.45/2.46  |             v0))
% 12.45/2.46  | 
% 12.45/2.46  | DELTA: instantiating (8) with fresh symbols all_29_0, all_29_1, all_29_2,
% 12.45/2.46  |        all_29_3, all_29_4, all_29_5, all_29_6, all_29_7, all_29_8, all_29_9,
% 12.45/2.46  |        all_29_10, all_29_11, all_29_12, all_29_13, all_29_14, all_29_15,
% 12.45/2.46  |        all_29_16, all_29_17, all_29_18 gives:
% 12.45/2.47  |   (11)   ~ (all_29_0 = 0) & p(all_29_11) = all_29_3 & n(all_29_17) = all_29_14
% 12.45/2.47  |         & n(all_29_18) = all_29_11 & n(e) = all_29_18 & a(all_29_6, all_29_10)
% 12.45/2.47  |         = all_29_5 & a(all_29_15, all_29_13) = all_29_12 & a(all_29_17,
% 12.45/2.47  |           all_29_3) = all_29_2 & a(all_29_17, all_29_16) = all_29_15 &
% 12.45/2.47  |         u(all_29_4, all_29_2) = all_29_1 & u(all_29_7, all_29_5) = all_29_4 &
% 12.45/2.47  |         u(all_29_12, all_29_9) = all_29_8 & u(all_29_18, all_29_14) =
% 12.45/2.47  |         all_29_13 & s(all_29_10) = all_29_9 & s(all_29_11) = all_29_10 &
% 12.45/2.47  |         s(all_29_13) = all_29_7 & s(all_29_16) = all_29_6 & s(all_29_17) =
% 12.45/2.47  |         all_29_16 & s(all_29_18) = all_29_17 & subq(all_29_8, all_29_1) =
% 12.45/2.47  |         all_29_0 & $i(all_29_1) & $i(all_29_2) & $i(all_29_3) & $i(all_29_4) &
% 12.45/2.47  |         $i(all_29_5) & $i(all_29_6) & $i(all_29_7) & $i(all_29_8) &
% 12.45/2.47  |         $i(all_29_9) & $i(all_29_10) & $i(all_29_11) & $i(all_29_12) &
% 12.45/2.47  |         $i(all_29_13) & $i(all_29_14) & $i(all_29_15) & $i(all_29_16) &
% 12.45/2.47  |         $i(all_29_17) & $i(all_29_18)
% 12.45/2.47  | 
% 12.45/2.47  | ALPHA: (11) implies:
% 12.45/2.47  |   (12)   ~ (all_29_0 = 0)
% 12.45/2.47  |   (13)  $i(all_29_17)
% 12.45/2.47  |   (14)  $i(all_29_16)
% 12.45/2.47  |   (15)  $i(all_29_15)
% 12.45/2.47  |   (16)  $i(all_29_13)
% 12.45/2.47  |   (17)  $i(all_29_10)
% 12.45/2.47  |   (18)  $i(all_29_8)
% 12.45/2.47  |   (19)  $i(all_29_6)
% 12.45/2.47  |   (20)  $i(all_29_4)
% 12.45/2.47  |   (21)  $i(all_29_3)
% 12.45/2.47  |   (22)  $i(all_29_1)
% 12.45/2.47  |   (23)  subq(all_29_8, all_29_1) = all_29_0
% 12.45/2.47  |   (24)  s(all_29_18) = all_29_17
% 12.45/2.47  |   (25)  s(all_29_16) = all_29_6
% 12.45/2.47  |   (26)  s(all_29_13) = all_29_7
% 12.45/2.47  |   (27)  s(all_29_10) = all_29_9
% 12.45/2.47  |   (28)  u(all_29_12, all_29_9) = all_29_8
% 12.45/2.47  |   (29)  u(all_29_7, all_29_5) = all_29_4
% 12.45/2.47  |   (30)  u(all_29_4, all_29_2) = all_29_1
% 12.45/2.47  |   (31)  a(all_29_17, all_29_16) = all_29_15
% 12.45/2.47  |   (32)  a(all_29_17, all_29_3) = all_29_2
% 12.45/2.47  |   (33)  a(all_29_15, all_29_13) = all_29_12
% 12.45/2.47  |   (34)  a(all_29_6, all_29_10) = all_29_5
% 12.45/2.47  |   (35)  n(e) = all_29_18
% 12.45/2.47  |   (36)  n(all_29_18) = all_29_11
% 12.45/2.47  | 
% 12.45/2.47  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_29_8, all_29_1, all_29_0, simplifying
% 12.45/2.47  |              with (18), (22), (23) gives:
% 12.45/2.47  |   (37)  all_29_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & mem(v0,
% 12.45/2.47  |             all_29_1) = v1 & mem(v0, all_29_8) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 12.45/2.47  | 
% 12.45/2.47  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_29_17, all_29_16, all_29_15,
% 12.45/2.47  |              simplifying with (13), (14), (31) gives:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (38)   ? [v0: $i] : (u(all_29_17, v0) = all_29_15 & s(all_29_16) = v0 &
% 12.45/2.48  |           $i(v0) & $i(all_29_15))
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_29_17, all_29_3, all_29_2, simplifying
% 12.45/2.48  |              with (13), (21), (32) gives:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (39)   ? [v0: $i] : (u(all_29_17, v0) = all_29_2 & s(all_29_3) = v0 & $i(v0)
% 12.45/2.48  |           & $i(all_29_2))
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_29_15, all_29_13, all_29_12,
% 12.45/2.48  |              simplifying with (15), (16), (33) gives:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (40)   ? [v0: $i] : (u(all_29_15, v0) = all_29_12 & s(all_29_13) = v0 &
% 12.45/2.48  |           $i(v0) & $i(all_29_12))
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_29_6, all_29_10, all_29_5, simplifying
% 12.45/2.48  |              with (17), (19), (34) gives:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (41)   ? [v0: $i] : (u(all_29_6, v0) = all_29_5 & s(all_29_10) = v0 & $i(v0)
% 12.45/2.48  |           & $i(all_29_5))
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with e, all_29_18, simplifying with (7), (35)
% 12.45/2.48  |              gives:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (42)  a(e, e) = all_29_18 & $i(all_29_18)
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | ALPHA: (42) implies:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (43)  $i(all_29_18)
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_29_18, all_29_11, simplifying with
% 12.45/2.48  |              (36), (43) gives:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (44)  a(all_29_18, all_29_18) = all_29_11 & $i(all_29_11)
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | ALPHA: (44) implies:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (45)  a(all_29_18, all_29_18) = all_29_11
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | DELTA: instantiating (40) with fresh symbol all_37_0 gives:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (46)  u(all_29_15, all_37_0) = all_29_12 & s(all_29_13) = all_37_0 &
% 12.45/2.48  |         $i(all_37_0) & $i(all_29_12)
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | ALPHA: (46) implies:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (47)  $i(all_29_12)
% 12.45/2.48  |   (48)  $i(all_37_0)
% 12.45/2.48  |   (49)  s(all_29_13) = all_37_0
% 12.45/2.48  |   (50)  u(all_29_15, all_37_0) = all_29_12
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | DELTA: instantiating (41) with fresh symbol all_39_0 gives:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (51)  u(all_29_6, all_39_0) = all_29_5 & s(all_29_10) = all_39_0 &
% 12.45/2.48  |         $i(all_39_0) & $i(all_29_5)
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | ALPHA: (51) implies:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (52)  $i(all_29_5)
% 12.45/2.48  |   (53)  $i(all_39_0)
% 12.45/2.48  |   (54)  s(all_29_10) = all_39_0
% 12.45/2.48  |   (55)  u(all_29_6, all_39_0) = all_29_5
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | DELTA: instantiating (38) with fresh symbol all_41_0 gives:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (56)  u(all_29_17, all_41_0) = all_29_15 & s(all_29_16) = all_41_0 &
% 12.45/2.48  |         $i(all_41_0) & $i(all_29_15)
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | ALPHA: (56) implies:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (57)  $i(all_41_0)
% 12.45/2.48  |   (58)  s(all_29_16) = all_41_0
% 12.45/2.48  |   (59)  u(all_29_17, all_41_0) = all_29_15
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | DELTA: instantiating (39) with fresh symbol all_43_0 gives:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (60)  u(all_29_17, all_43_0) = all_29_2 & s(all_29_3) = all_43_0 &
% 12.45/2.48  |         $i(all_43_0) & $i(all_29_2)
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | ALPHA: (60) implies:
% 12.45/2.48  |   (61)  $i(all_29_2)
% 12.45/2.48  |   (62)  $i(all_43_0)
% 12.45/2.48  |   (63)  u(all_29_17, all_43_0) = all_29_2
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.48  | BETA: splitting (37) gives:
% 12.45/2.48  | 
% 12.45/2.49  | Case 1:
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (64)  all_29_0 = 0
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | | REDUCE: (12), (64) imply:
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (65)  $false
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | | CLOSE: (65) is inconsistent.
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | Case 2:
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (66)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & mem(v0, all_29_1) = v1 &
% 12.45/2.49  | |           mem(v0, all_29_8) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | | DELTA: instantiating (66) with fresh symbols all_49_0, all_49_1 gives:
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (67)   ~ (all_49_0 = 0) & mem(all_49_1, all_29_1) = all_49_0 &
% 12.45/2.49  | |         mem(all_49_1, all_29_8) = 0 & $i(all_49_1)
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | | ALPHA: (67) implies:
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (68)   ~ (all_49_0 = 0)
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (69)  $i(all_49_1)
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (70)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_8) = 0
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (71)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_1) = all_49_0
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_29_6, all_41_0, all_29_16,
% 12.45/2.49  | |              simplifying with (25), (58) gives:
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (72)  all_41_0 = all_29_6
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_29_7, all_37_0, all_29_13,
% 12.45/2.49  | |              simplifying with (26), (49) gives:
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (73)  all_37_0 = all_29_7
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_29_9, all_39_0, all_29_10,
% 12.45/2.49  | |              simplifying with (27), (54) gives:
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (74)  all_39_0 = all_29_9
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | | REDUCE: (55), (74) imply:
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (75)  u(all_29_6, all_29_9) = all_29_5
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | | REDUCE: (50), (73) imply:
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (76)  u(all_29_15, all_29_7) = all_29_12
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | | REDUCE: (59), (72) imply:
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (77)  u(all_29_17, all_29_6) = all_29_15
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | | REDUCE: (53), (74) imply:
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (78)  $i(all_29_9)
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | | REDUCE: (48), (73) imply:
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (79)  $i(all_29_7)
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_49_1, all_29_12, all_29_9, all_29_8,
% 12.45/2.49  | |              simplifying with (28), (47), (69), (70), (78) gives:
% 12.45/2.49  | |   (80)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (mem(all_49_1, all_29_9) = v1 &
% 12.45/2.49  | |           mem(all_49_1, all_29_12) = v0 & (v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 12.45/2.49  | | 
% 12.45/2.49  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_49_1, all_29_4, all_29_2, all_29_1,
% 12.45/2.49  | |              all_49_0, simplifying with (20), (30), (61), (69), (71) gives:
% 12.45/2.50  | |   (81)  all_49_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 =
% 12.45/2.50  | |             0) & mem(all_49_1, all_29_2) = v1 & mem(all_49_1, all_29_4) =
% 12.45/2.50  | |           v0)
% 12.45/2.50  | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_29_18, all_29_18, all_29_11,
% 12.45/2.50  | |              simplifying with (43), (45) gives:
% 12.45/2.50  | |   (82)   ? [v0: $i] : (u(all_29_18, v0) = all_29_11 & s(all_29_18) = v0 &
% 12.45/2.50  | |           $i(v0) & $i(all_29_11))
% 12.45/2.50  | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | DELTA: instantiating (82) with fresh symbol all_67_0 gives:
% 12.45/2.50  | |   (83)  u(all_29_18, all_67_0) = all_29_11 & s(all_29_18) = all_67_0 &
% 12.45/2.50  | |         $i(all_67_0) & $i(all_29_11)
% 12.45/2.50  | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | ALPHA: (83) implies:
% 12.45/2.50  | |   (84)  $i(all_67_0)
% 12.45/2.50  | |   (85)  s(all_29_18) = all_67_0
% 12.45/2.50  | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | DELTA: instantiating (80) with fresh symbols all_71_0, all_71_1 gives:
% 12.45/2.50  | |   (86)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_9) = all_71_0 & mem(all_49_1, all_29_12) =
% 12.45/2.50  | |         all_71_1 & (all_71_0 = 0 | all_71_1 = 0)
% 12.45/2.50  | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | ALPHA: (86) implies:
% 12.45/2.50  | |   (87)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_12) = all_71_1
% 12.45/2.50  | |   (88)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_9) = all_71_0
% 12.45/2.50  | |   (89)  all_71_0 = 0 | all_71_1 = 0
% 12.45/2.50  | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | BETA: splitting (81) gives:
% 12.45/2.50  | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | Case 1:
% 12.45/2.50  | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | |   (90)  all_49_0 = 0
% 12.45/2.50  | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | REDUCE: (68), (90) imply:
% 12.45/2.50  | | |   (91)  $false
% 12.45/2.50  | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | CLOSE: (91) is inconsistent.
% 12.45/2.50  | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | Case 2:
% 12.45/2.50  | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | |   (92)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 12.45/2.50  | | |           mem(all_49_1, all_29_2) = v1 & mem(all_49_1, all_29_4) = v0)
% 12.45/2.50  | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | DELTA: instantiating (92) with fresh symbols all_77_0, all_77_1 gives:
% 12.45/2.50  | | |   (93)   ~ (all_77_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_77_1 = 0) & mem(all_49_1, all_29_2) =
% 12.45/2.50  | | |         all_77_0 & mem(all_49_1, all_29_4) = all_77_1
% 12.45/2.50  | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | ALPHA: (93) implies:
% 12.45/2.50  | | |   (94)   ~ (all_77_1 = 0)
% 12.45/2.50  | | |   (95)   ~ (all_77_0 = 0)
% 12.45/2.50  | | |   (96)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_4) = all_77_1
% 12.45/2.50  | | |   (97)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_2) = all_77_0
% 12.45/2.50  | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_29_17, all_67_0, all_29_18,
% 12.45/2.50  | | |              simplifying with (24), (85) gives:
% 12.45/2.50  | | |   (98)  all_67_0 = all_29_17
% 12.45/2.50  | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_49_1, all_29_7, all_29_5,
% 12.45/2.50  | | |              all_29_4, all_77_1, simplifying with (29), (52), (69), (79),
% 12.45/2.50  | | |              (96) gives:
% 12.45/2.50  | | |   (99)  all_77_1 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0
% 12.45/2.50  | | |             = 0) & mem(all_49_1, all_29_5) = v1 & mem(all_49_1, all_29_7)
% 12.45/2.50  | | |           = v0)
% 12.45/2.50  | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_49_1, all_29_17, all_43_0,
% 12.45/2.50  | | |              all_29_2, all_77_0, simplifying with (13), (62), (63), (69),
% 12.45/2.50  | | |              (97) gives:
% 12.45/2.50  | | |   (100)  all_77_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~
% 12.45/2.50  | | |            (v0 = 0) & mem(all_49_1, all_43_0) = v1 & mem(all_49_1,
% 12.45/2.50  | | |              all_29_17) = v0)
% 12.45/2.50  | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | BETA: splitting (89) gives:
% 12.45/2.50  | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | Case 1:
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | |   (101)  all_71_0 = 0
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | REDUCE: (88), (101) imply:
% 12.45/2.50  | | | |   (102)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_9) = 0
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | BETA: splitting (99) gives:
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | Case 1:
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | |   (103)  all_77_1 = 0
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | | REDUCE: (94), (103) imply:
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | |   (104)  $false
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | | CLOSE: (104) is inconsistent.
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | Case 2:
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | |   (105)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | |            mem(all_49_1, all_29_5) = v1 & mem(all_49_1, all_29_7) =
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | |            v0)
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (105) with fresh symbols all_99_0, all_99_1
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | |        gives:
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | |   (106)   ~ (all_99_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_99_1 = 0) & mem(all_49_1,
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | |            all_29_5) = all_99_0 & mem(all_49_1, all_29_7) = all_99_1
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.50  | | | | | ALPHA: (106) implies:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |   (107)   ~ (all_99_0 = 0)
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |   (108)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_5) = all_99_0
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_49_1, all_29_10, all_29_9,
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |              simplifying with (17), (27), (69), (102) gives:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |   (109)  all_49_1 = all_29_10
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_49_1, all_29_6, all_29_9,
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |              all_29_5, all_99_0, simplifying with (19), (69), (75),
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |              (78), (108) gives:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |   (110)  all_99_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |            ~ (v0 = 0) & mem(all_49_1, all_29_6) = v0 & mem(all_49_1,
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |              all_29_9) = v1)
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | REDUCE: (102), (109) imply:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |   (111)  mem(all_29_10, all_29_9) = 0
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | BETA: splitting (110) gives:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | Case 1:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (112)  all_99_0 = 0
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | REDUCE: (107), (112) imply:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (113)  $false
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | CLOSE: (113) is inconsistent.
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | Case 2:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (114)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |            mem(all_49_1, all_29_6) = v0 & mem(all_49_1, all_29_9) =
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |            v1)
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (114) with fresh symbols all_111_0, all_111_1
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |        gives:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (115)   ~ (all_111_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_111_1 = 0) & mem(all_49_1,
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |            all_29_6) = all_111_1 & mem(all_49_1, all_29_9) =
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |          all_111_0
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | ALPHA: (115) implies:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (116)   ~ (all_111_0 = 0)
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (117)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_9) = all_111_0
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | REDUCE: (109), (117) imply:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (118)  mem(all_29_10, all_29_9) = all_111_0
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with 0, all_111_0, all_29_9,
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |              all_29_10, simplifying with (111), (118) gives:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (119)  all_111_0 = 0
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | REDUCE: (116), (119) imply:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (120)  $false
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | CLOSE: (120) is inconsistent.
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | End of split
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | End of split
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | Case 2:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | |   (121)  all_71_1 = 0
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | REDUCE: (87), (121) imply:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | |   (122)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_12) = 0
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | BETA: splitting (100) gives:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | Case 1:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |   (123)  all_77_0 = 0
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | REDUCE: (95), (123) imply:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |   (124)  $false
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | CLOSE: (124) is inconsistent.
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | Case 2:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |   (125)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |            mem(all_49_1, all_43_0) = v1 & mem(all_49_1, all_29_17) =
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |            v0)
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (125) with fresh symbols all_94_0, all_94_1
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |        gives:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |   (126)   ~ (all_94_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_94_1 = 0) & mem(all_49_1,
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |            all_43_0) = all_94_0 & mem(all_49_1, all_29_17) = all_94_1
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | ALPHA: (126) implies:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |   (127)   ~ (all_94_1 = 0)
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | |   (128)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_17) = all_94_1
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | BETA: splitting (99) gives:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | Case 1:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (129)  all_77_1 = 0
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | REDUCE: (94), (129) imply:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (130)  $false
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | CLOSE: (130) is inconsistent.
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | Case 2:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (131)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |            mem(all_49_1, all_29_5) = v1 & mem(all_49_1, all_29_7) =
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |            v0)
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (131) with fresh symbols all_99_0, all_99_1
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |        gives:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (132)   ~ (all_99_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_99_1 = 0) & mem(all_49_1,
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |            all_29_5) = all_99_0 & mem(all_49_1, all_29_7) = all_99_1
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | ALPHA: (132) implies:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (133)   ~ (all_99_1 = 0)
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (134)   ~ (all_99_0 = 0)
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (135)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_7) = all_99_1
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (136)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_5) = all_99_0
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_49_1, all_29_15, all_29_7,
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |              all_29_12, simplifying with (15), (69), (76), (79),
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |              (122) gives:
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |   (137)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (mem(all_49_1, all_29_7) = v1
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |            & mem(all_49_1, all_29_15) = v0 & (v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_49_1, all_29_6, all_29_9,
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |              all_29_5, all_99_0, simplifying with (19), (69), (75),
% 12.45/2.51  | | | | | |              (78), (136) gives:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | |   (138)  all_99_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | |             ~ (v0 = 0) & mem(all_49_1, all_29_6) = v0 &
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | |            mem(all_49_1, all_29_9) = v1)
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (137) with fresh symbols all_106_0, all_106_1
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | |        gives:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | |   (139)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_7) = all_106_0 & mem(all_49_1,
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | |            all_29_15) = all_106_1 & (all_106_0 = 0 | all_106_1 = 0)
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | ALPHA: (139) implies:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | |   (140)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_15) = all_106_1
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | |   (141)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_7) = all_106_0
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | |   (142)  all_106_0 = 0 | all_106_1 = 0
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | BETA: splitting (138) gives:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | Case 1:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | |   (143)  all_99_0 = 0
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | REDUCE: (134), (143) imply:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | |   (144)  $false
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | CLOSE: (144) is inconsistent.
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | Case 2:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | |   (145)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0)
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | |            & mem(all_49_1, all_29_6) = v0 & mem(all_49_1,
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | |              all_29_9) = v1)
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (145) with fresh symbols all_112_0, all_112_1
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | |        gives:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | |   (146)   ~ (all_112_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_112_1 = 0) & mem(all_49_1,
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | |            all_29_6) = all_112_1 & mem(all_49_1, all_29_9) =
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | |          all_112_0
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | ALPHA: (146) implies:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | |   (147)   ~ (all_112_1 = 0)
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | |   (148)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_6) = all_112_1
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_99_1, all_106_0,
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | |              all_29_7, all_49_1, simplifying with (135), (141)
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | |              gives:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | |   (149)  all_106_0 = all_99_1
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (142) gives:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | |   (150)  all_106_0 = 0
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (149), (150) imply:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | |   (151)  all_99_1 = 0
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | | SIMP: (151) implies:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | |   (152)  all_99_1 = 0
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (133), (152) imply:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | |   (153)  $false
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (153) is inconsistent.
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | |   (154)  all_106_1 = 0
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (140), (154) imply:
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | |   (155)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_15) = 0
% 12.45/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_49_1, all_29_17,
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |              all_29_6, all_29_15, simplifying with (13), (19),
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |              (69), (77), (155) gives:
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |   (156)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (mem(all_49_1, all_29_6)
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |            = v1 & mem(all_49_1, all_29_17) = v0 & (v1 = 0 | v0 =
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |              0))
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (156) with fresh symbols all_127_0,
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |        all_127_1 gives:
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |   (157)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_6) = all_127_0 & mem(all_49_1,
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |            all_29_17) = all_127_1 & (all_127_0 = 0 | all_127_1 =
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |            0)
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (157) implies:
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |   (158)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_17) = all_127_1
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |   (159)  mem(all_49_1, all_29_6) = all_127_0
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |   (160)  all_127_0 = 0 | all_127_1 = 0
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_94_1, all_127_1,
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |              all_29_17, all_49_1, simplifying with (128), (158)
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |              gives:
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |   (161)  all_127_1 = all_94_1
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_112_1, all_127_0,
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |              all_29_6, all_49_1, simplifying with (148), (159)
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |              gives:
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | |   (162)  all_127_0 = all_112_1
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (160) gives:
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | |   (163)  all_127_0 = 0
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (162), (163) imply:
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | |   (164)  all_112_1 = 0
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (147), (164) imply:
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | |   (165)  $false
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (165) is inconsistent.
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | |   (166)  all_127_1 = 0
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (161), (166) imply:
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | |   (167)  all_94_1 = 0
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (167) implies:
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | |   (168)  all_94_1 = 0
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (127), (168) imply:
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | |   (169)  $false
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (169) is inconsistent.
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | End of split
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | End of split
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | End of split
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | End of split
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | End of split
% 12.91/2.52  | | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | | End of split
% 12.91/2.52  | | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | | End of split
% 12.91/2.52  | | 
% 12.91/2.52  | End of split
% 12.91/2.52  | 
% 12.91/2.52  End of proof
% 12.91/2.52  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 12.91/2.52  
% 12.91/2.52  1896ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------