↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEV608+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:35:19 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.30s 6.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  17   ~;  14   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('_HAMMER_GOAL',conjecture,
    ! [X76] :
      ( cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(X76)
     => ! [X82] :
          ( cColor_2egraph___24t(X82)
         => ! [X95] :
              ( cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt___24t(X95)
             => ( cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2echoose___24a1(cColor_2esubset__nodes___24a2(cColor_2elow__deg___24a1(X76),X82)) = cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eSome___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt,X95)
               => cCoq_2eInit_2ePeano_2elt___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,cColor_2eremove__node___24a2(X95,X82)),cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,X82)) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','_HAMMER_GOAL') ).

fof('Color.select_terminates',axiom,
    ! [X76] :
      ( cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(X76)
     => ! [X82] :
          ( cColor_2egraph___24t(X82)
         => ! [X95] :
              ( cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt___24t(X95)
             => ( cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2echoose___24a1(cColor_2esubset__nodes___24a2(cColor_2elow__deg___24a1(X76),X82)) = cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eSome___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt,X95)
               => cCoq_2eInit_2ePeano_2elt___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,cColor_2eremove__node___24a2(X95,X82)),cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,X82)) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','Color.select_terminates') ).

fof('$adef_Color.low_deg_$a1',axiom,
    ! [X2683] : happ(cColor_2elow__deg,X2683) = cColor_2elow__deg___24a1(X2683),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','$adef_Color.low_deg_$a1') ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X76] :
        ( cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(X76)
       => ! [X82] :
            ( cColor_2egraph___24t(X82)
           => ! [X95] :
                ( cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt___24t(X95)
               => ( cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2echoose___24a1(cColor_2esubset__nodes___24a2(cColor_2elow__deg___24a1(X76),X82)) = cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eSome___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt,X95)
                 => cCoq_2eInit_2ePeano_2elt___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,cColor_2eremove__node___24a2(X95,X82)),cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,X82)) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['_HAMMER_GOAL']) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X2774,X2775,X2776] :
      ( cCoq_2eInit_2ePeano_2elt___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,cColor_2eremove__node___24a2(X2776,X2775)),cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,X2775))
      | cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2echoose___24a1(cColor_2esubset__nodes___24a2(cColor_2elow__deg___24a1(X2774),X2775)) != cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eSome___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt,X2776)
      | ~ cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt___24t(X2776)
      | ~ cColor_2egraph___24t(X2775)
      | ~ cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(X2774) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['Color.select_terminates'])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X2785] : happ(cColor_2elow__deg,X2785) = cColor_2elow__deg___24a1(X2785),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['$adef_Color.low_deg_$a1']) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ cCoq_2eInit_2ePeano_2elt___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,cColor_2eremove__node___24a2(esk3_0,esk2_0)),cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,esk2_0))
    & cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2echoose___24a1(cColor_2esubset__nodes___24a2(cColor_2elow__deg___24a1(esk1_0),esk2_0)) = cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eSome___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt,esk3_0)
    & cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt___24t(esk3_0)
    & cColor_2egraph___24t(esk2_0)
    & cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(esk1_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2echoose___24a1(cColor_2esubset__nodes___24a2(cColor_2elow__deg___24a1(X1),X2)) != cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eSome___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt,X3)
    | ~ cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt___24t(X3)
    | ~ cColor_2egraph___24t(X2)
    | ~ cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(X1)
    | cCoq_2eInit_2ePeano_2elt___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,cColor_2eremove__node___24a2(X3,X2)),cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    happ(cColor_2elow__deg,X1) = cColor_2elow__deg___24a1(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2echoose___24a1(cColor_2esubset__nodes___24a2(cColor_2elow__deg___24a1(esk1_0),esk2_0)) = cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eSome___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ cColor_2egraph___24t(X2)
    | ~ cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt___24t(X1)
    | ~ cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(X3)
    | cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2echoose___24a1(cColor_2esubset__nodes___24a2(happ(cColor_2elow__deg,X3),X2)) != cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eSome___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt,X1)
    | cCoq_2eInit_2ePeano_2elt___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,cColor_2eremove__node___24a2(X1,X2)),cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2echoose___24a1(cColor_2esubset__nodes___24a2(happ(cColor_2elow__deg,esk1_0),esk2_0)) = cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eSome___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    cColor_2egraph___24t(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cCoq_2eInit_2ePeano_2elt___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,cColor_2eremove__node___24a2(esk3_0,esk2_0)),cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt___24t(X1)
    | cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eSome___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt,esk3_0) != cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eSome___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt,X1)
    | cCoq_2eInit_2ePeano_2elt___24a2(cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,cColor_2eremove__node___24a2(X1,esk2_0)),cCoq_2eFSets_2eFMapPositive_2ePositiveMap_2ecardinal___24a2(cColor_2enodeset,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    cCoq_2eFSets_2eFSetPositive_2ePositiveSet_2eelt___24t(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEV608+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.40  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/5.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/5.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/5.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/5.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/5.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/5.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/5.40  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:30:15 UTC 2026
% 0.15/5.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/5.41  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/6.47  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.30/6.47  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 1.30/6.47  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.30/6.47  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.30/6.47  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.30/6.47  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.30/6.47  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 1.30/6.47  % new_bool_1 with pid 492449 completed with status 0
% 1.30/6.47  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 1.30/6.47  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 1.30/6.47  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.30/6.47  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.30/6.47  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.30/6.47  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.30/6.47  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.30/6.47  % Search class: FGHSS-FMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.30/6.47  % partial match(1): FGHSS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.30/6.47  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 1.30/6.47  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores
% 1.30/6.47  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 541s (1) cores
% 1.30/6.47  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores
% 1.30/6.47  % G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 492454 completed with status 0
% 1.30/6.47  % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.30/6.47  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 1.30/6.47  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.30/6.47  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.30/6.47  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.30/6.47  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.30/6.47  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.30/6.47  % Search class: FGHSS-FMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.30/6.47  % partial match(1): FGHSS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.30/6.47  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 1.30/6.47  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores
% 1.30/6.47  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 541s (1) cores
% 1.30/6.47  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores
% 1.30/6.47  % Preprocessing time       : 0.036 s
% 1.30/6.47  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.30/6.47  
% 1.30/6.47  % Proof found!
% 1.30/6.47  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.30/6.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.30/6.47  % Parsed axioms                        : 2868
% 1.30/6.47  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2711
% 1.30/6.47  % Initial clauses                      : 708
% 1.30/6.47  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 19
% 1.30/6.47  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 689
% 1.30/6.47  % Processed clauses                    : 1146
% 1.30/6.47  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 1.30/6.47  % ...subsumed                          : 406
% 1.30/6.47  % ...remaining for further processing  : 740
% 1.30/6.47  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 9
% 1.30/6.47  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.30/6.47  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 1.30/6.47  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 1.30/6.47  % Generated clauses                    : 717
% 1.30/6.47  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 666
% 1.30/6.47  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.30/6.47  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 25
% 1.30/6.47  % Paramodulations                      : 697
% 1.30/6.47  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.30/6.47  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.30/6.47  % Equation resolutions                 : 20
% 1.30/6.47  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.30/6.47  % Total rewrite steps                  : 259
% 1.30/6.47  % ...of those cached                   : 244
% 1.30/6.47  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.30/6.47  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.30/6.47  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.30/6.47  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.30/6.47  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.30/6.47  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.30/6.47  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.30/6.47  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.30/6.47  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.30/6.47  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.30/6.47  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.30/6.47  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.30/6.47  % Current number of processed clauses  : 251
% 1.30/6.47  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 27
% 1.30/6.47  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 1.30/6.47  %    Negative unit clauses             : 8
% 1.30/6.47  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 215
% 1.30/6.47  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 682
% 1.30/6.47  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4072
% 1.30/6.47  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.30/6.47  % Current number of archived clauses   : 480
% 1.30/6.47  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 150155
% 1.30/6.47  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12734
% 1.30/6.47  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 428
% 1.30/6.47  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 99
% 1.30/6.47  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.30/6.47  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 1.30/6.47  % BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 1.30/6.47  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.30/6.47  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.30/6.47  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 164150
% 1.30/6.47  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 49024
% 1.30/6.47  
% 1.30/6.47  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.30/6.47  % User time                : 0.378 s
% 1.30/6.47  % System time              : 0.040 s
% 1.30/6.47  % Total time               : 0.418 s
% 1.30/6.47  % Maximum resident set size: 15984 pages
% 1.30/6.47  
% 1.30/6.47  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.30/6.47  % User time                : 1.286 s
% 1.30/6.47  % System time              : 0.122 s
% 1.30/6.47  % Total time               : 1.408 s
% 1.30/6.47  % Maximum resident set size: 12544 pages
% 1.30/6.47  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------