↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEV629+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:35:21 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.36s 0.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   50 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   45 (  17   ~;  16   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   3 sgn  27   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('_HAMMER_GOAL',conjecture,
    cCoq_2eRelations_2eRelation__Definitions_2ereflexive___24a2(c_24__type__35378,cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a1(cA)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','_HAMMER_GOAL') ).

fof('$_def_HahnSets.set_subset',axiom,
    ! [X42,X452,X453] :
      ( cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a3(X42,X452,X453)
    <=> ! [X24] :
          ( t(X24,X42)
         => ( p(happ(X452,X24))
           => p(happ(X453,X24)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','$_def_HahnSets.set_subset') ).

fof('$adef_HahnSets.set_subset_$a1',axiom,
    ! [X2813] : happ(cHahnSets_2eset__subset,X2813) = cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a1(X2813),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','$adef_HahnSets.set_subset_$a1') ).

fof('$_def_Coq.Relations.Relation_Definitions.reflexive',axiom,
    ! [X42,X134] :
      ( cCoq_2eRelations_2eRelation__Definitions_2ereflexive___24a2(X42,X134)
    <=> ! [X131] :
          ( t(X131,X42)
         => p(happ(happ(X134,X131),X131)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','$_def_Coq.Relations.Relation_Definitions.reflexive') ).

fof('$adef_HahnSets.set_subset_$a3',axiom,
    ! [X2813,X2814,X2815] :
      ( p(happ(happ(happ(cHahnSets_2eset__subset,X2813),X2814),X2815))
    <=> cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a3(X2813,X2814,X2815) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','$adef_HahnSets.set_subset_$a3') ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cCoq_2eRelations_2eRelation__Definitions_2ereflexive___24a2(c_24__type__35378,cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a1(cA)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['_HAMMER_GOAL']) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cCoq_2eRelations_2eRelation__Definitions_2ereflexive___24a2(c_24__type__35378,cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a1(cA)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X2855,X2856,X2857,X2858,X2859,X2860,X2861] :
      ( ( cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a3(X2859,X2860,X2861)
        | ~ p(happ(X2861,esk5_3(X2859,X2860,X2861))) )
      & ( cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a3(X2859,X2860,X2861)
        | p(happ(X2860,esk5_3(X2859,X2860,X2861))) )
      & ( cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a3(X2859,X2860,X2861)
        | t(esk5_3(X2859,X2860,X2861),X2859) )
      & ( p(happ(X2857,X2858))
        | ~ p(happ(X2856,X2858))
        | ~ t(X2858,X2855)
        | ~ cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a3(X2855,X2856,X2857) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['$_def_HahnSets.set_subset'])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cCoq_2eRelations_2eRelation__Definitions_2ereflexive___24a2(c_24__type__35378,cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a1(cA)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X2842] : happ(cHahnSets_2eset__subset,X2842) = cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a1(X2842),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['$adef_HahnSets.set_subset_$a1']) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X2836,X2837,X2838,X2839,X2840] :
      ( ( cCoq_2eRelations_2eRelation__Definitions_2ereflexive___24a2(X2839,X2840)
        | ~ p(happ(happ(X2840,esk1_2(X2839,X2840)),esk1_2(X2839,X2840))) )
      & ( cCoq_2eRelations_2eRelation__Definitions_2ereflexive___24a2(X2839,X2840)
        | t(esk1_2(X2839,X2840),X2839) )
      & ( p(happ(happ(X2837,X2838),X2838))
        | ~ t(X2838,X2836)
        | ~ cCoq_2eRelations_2eRelation__Definitions_2ereflexive___24a2(X2836,X2837) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['$_def_Coq.Relations.Relation_Definitions.reflexive'])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X2844,X2845,X2846] :
      ( ( p(happ(happ(happ(cHahnSets_2eset__subset,X2844),X2845),X2846))
        | ~ cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a3(X2844,X2845,X2846) )
      & ( cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a3(X2844,X2845,X2846)
        | ~ p(happ(happ(happ(cHahnSets_2eset__subset,X2844),X2845),X2846)) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['$adef_HahnSets.set_subset_$a3'])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ p(happ(X1,esk5_3(X2,X3,X1)))
    | cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a3(X2,X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a3(X2,X1,X3)
    | p(happ(X1,esk5_3(X2,X1,X3))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cCoq_2eRelations_2eRelation__Definitions_2ereflexive___24a2(c_24__type__35378,cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a1(cA)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    happ(cHahnSets_2eset__subset,X1) = cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a1(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ p(happ(happ(X1,esk1_2(X2,X1)),esk1_2(X2,X1)))
    | cCoq_2eRelations_2eRelation__Definitions_2ereflexive___24a2(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a3(X1,X2,X3)
    | p(happ(happ(happ(cHahnSets_2eset__subset,X1),X2),X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    cHahnSets_2eset__subset___24a3(X1,X2,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cCoq_2eRelations_2eRelation__Definitions_2ereflexive___24a2(c_24__type__35378,happ(cHahnSets_2eset__subset,cA)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    cCoq_2eRelations_2eRelation__Definitions_2ereflexive___24a2(X1,happ(cHahnSets_2eset__subset,X2)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEV629+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.39  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.39  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:31:20 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.39  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/0.68  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.36/0.68  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.68  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.68  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.36/0.68  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.36/0.68  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.68  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.68  % G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 3539864 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.68  % Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 0.36/0.68  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.68  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.68  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.36/0.68  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.36/0.68  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.68  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.68  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.36/0.68  % SinE strategy is gf120_h_gu_RUU_F100_L00500
% 0.36/0.68  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.68  % partial match(1): FGUNF-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.68  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.68  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.68  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3539871 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.68  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.36/0.68  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.68  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.68  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.36/0.68  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.36/0.68  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.68  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.68  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.36/0.68  % SinE strategy is gf120_h_gu_RUU_F100_L00500
% 0.36/0.68  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.68  % partial match(1): FGUNF-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.68  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.68  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.68  % Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.36/0.68  
% 0.36/0.68  % Proof found!
% 0.36/0.68  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.36/0.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/0.68  % Parsed axioms                        : 2963
% 0.36/0.68  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2940
% 0.36/0.68  % Initial clauses                      : 48
% 0.36/0.68  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 20
% 0.36/0.68  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 28
% 0.36/0.68  % Processed clauses                    : 24
% 0.36/0.68  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % ...remaining for further processing  : 24
% 0.36/0.68  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.36/0.68  % Generated clauses                    : 14
% 0.36/0.68  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11
% 0.36/0.68  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % Paramodulations                      : 14
% 0.36/0.68  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 0.36/0.68  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.36/0.68  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.36/0.68  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.36/0.68  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.36/0.68  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.36/0.68  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.36/0.68  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.36/0.68  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.36/0.68  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.36/0.68  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.36/0.68  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.36/0.68  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.36/0.68  % Current number of processed clauses  : 23
% 0.36/0.68  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.36/0.68  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.36/0.68  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.36/0.68  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 19
% 0.36/0.68  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15
% 0.36/0.68  % ...number of literals in the above   : 61
% 0.36/0.68  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.36/0.68  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 30
% 0.36/0.68  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.36/0.68  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.36/0.68  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.36/0.68  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.36/0.68  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.36/0.68  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 46094
% 0.36/0.68  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 36052
% 0.36/0.68  
% 0.36/0.68  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.68  % User time                : 0.027 s
% 0.36/0.68  % System time              : 0.022 s
% 0.36/0.68  % Total time               : 0.049 s
% 0.36/0.68  % Maximum resident set size: 15212 pages
% 0.36/0.68  
% 0.36/0.68  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.68  % User time                : 0.190 s
% 0.36/0.68  % System time              : 0.037 s
% 0.36/0.68  % Total time               : 0.227 s
% 0.36/0.68  % Maximum resident set size: 11520 pages
% 0.36/0.68  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------