%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEV664+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:35:24 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.31s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.31s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('_HAMMER_GOAL',conjecture,
! [X40] :
( cProp___24t(X40)
=> ! [X2130] :
( cProp___24t(X2130)
=> ( X40 = X2130
=> ( p(X40)
=> p(X2130) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','_HAMMER_GOAL') ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X40] :
( cProp___24t(X40)
=> ! [X2130] :
( cProp___24t(X2130)
=> ( X40 = X2130
=> ( p(X40)
=> p(X2130) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['_HAMMER_GOAL']) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(esk2_0)
& p(esk1_0)
& esk1_0 = esk2_0
& cProp___24t(esk2_0)
& cProp___24t(esk1_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ p(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk2_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
p(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ p(esk1_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEV664+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.39 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:35:10 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.31/0.62 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.31/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.31/0.62 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.31/0.62 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.62 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.62 % new_bool_1 with pid 378713 completed with status 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.31/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.31/0.62 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.31/0.62 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.31/0.62 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.31/0.62 % Search class: FUUSF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.62 % partial match(2): FGUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.62 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.31/0.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.62 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 541s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.62 % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 378718 completed with status 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.31/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.31/0.62 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.31/0.62 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.31/0.62 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.31/0.62 % Search class: FUUSF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.62 % partial match(2): FGUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.62 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.31/0.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.62 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 541s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.62 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.31/0.62 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.31/0.62
% 0.31/0.62 % Proof found!
% 0.31/0.62 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.31/0.62 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.31/0.62 % Parsed axioms : 2539
% 0.31/0.62 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2538
% 0.31/0.62 % Initial clauses : 5
% 0.31/0.62 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.31/0.62 % Processed clauses : 3
% 0.31/0.62 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.31/0.62 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % NegExts : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.31/0.62 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.62 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.62 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.62 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.62 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.62 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.62 % Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.31/0.62 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.31/0.62 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.31/0.62 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.31/0.62 % ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.31/0.62 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.31/0.62 % Termbank termtop insertions : 34888
% 0.31/0.62 % Search garbage collected termcells : 28218
% 0.31/0.62
% 0.31/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.62 % User time : 0.017 s
% 0.31/0.62 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.31/0.62 % Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.31/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 12860 pages
% 0.31/0.62
% 0.31/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.62 % User time : 0.150 s
% 0.31/0.62 % System time : 0.031 s
% 0.31/0.62 % Total time : 0.181 s
% 0.31/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 9984 pages
% 0.31/0.62 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------