%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SEV664+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 06:52:02 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.34s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.06 % Problem : SEV664+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.06/0.25 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.25 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.25 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.25 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.06/0.25 % DateTime : Tue May 5 07:54:15 EDT 2026
% 0.06/0.25 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.34 # SinE strategy is gf120_h_gu_RUU_F100_L00500
% 0.14/0.34 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.34 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.14/0.34 #
% 0.14/0.34 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.34
% 0.14/0.34 # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.34 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.14/0.34 fof('_HAMMER_GOAL', conjecture, ![X40]:(cProp___24t(X40)=>![X2130]:(cProp___24t(X2130)=>(X40=X2130=>(p(X40)=>p(X2130))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', '_HAMMER_GOAL')).
% 0.14/0.34 fof(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X40]:(cProp___24t(X40)=>![X2130]:(cProp___24t(X2130)=>(X40=X2130=>(p(X40)=>p(X2130)))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['_HAMMER_GOAL'])).
% 0.14/0.34 fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, (cProp___24t(esk1_0)&(cProp___24t(esk2_0)&(esk1_0=esk2_0&(p(esk1_0)&~p(esk2_0))))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])).
% 0.14/0.34 cnf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, (~p(esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.14/0.34 cnf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (esk1_0=esk2_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.14/0.34 cnf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (p(esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.14/0.34 cnf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (~p(esk1_0)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
% 0.14/0.34 cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6]), ['proof']).
% 0.14/0.34 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.14/0.34 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------