↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEV668+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:15:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.93s 6.33s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (   6   ~;   0   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   5 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('_HAMMER_GOAL',conjecture,
    ! [X2199] :
      ( cRedblack_2ecolor___24t(X2199)
     => ! [X153] :
          ( cRedblack_2eTREES_2etree___24t(X153)
         => ! [X593] :
              ( cRedblack_2ekey___24t(X593)
             => ! [X767] :
                  ( cV___24t(X767)
                 => ! [X2283] :
                      ( cRedblack_2eTREES_2etree___24t(X2283)
                     => cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(X2199,X153,X593,X767,X2283) != cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','_HAMMER_GOAL') ).

fof('$_discrim_Redblack.TREES.E$Redblack.TREES.T',axiom,
    ! [X844,X845,X846,X847,X848] : cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE != cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(X844,X845,X846,X847,X848),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','$_discrim_Redblack.TREES.E$Redblack.TREES.T') ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2199] :
        ( cRedblack_2ecolor___24t(X2199)
       => ! [X153] :
            ( cRedblack_2eTREES_2etree___24t(X153)
           => ! [X593] :
                ( cRedblack_2ekey___24t(X593)
               => ! [X767] :
                    ( cV___24t(X767)
                   => ! [X2283] :
                        ( cRedblack_2eTREES_2etree___24t(X2283)
                       => cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(X2199,X153,X593,X767,X2283) != cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['_HAMMER_GOAL']) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( cRedblack_2ecolor___24t(esk1_0)
    & cRedblack_2eTREES_2etree___24t(esk2_0)
    & cRedblack_2ekey___24t(esk3_0)
    & cV___24t(esk4_0)
    & cRedblack_2eTREES_2etree___24t(esk5_0)
    & cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0,esk5_0) = cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X2315,X2316,X2317,X2318,X2319] : cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE != cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(X2315,X2316,X2317,X2318,X2319),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['$_discrim_Redblack.TREES.E$Redblack.TREES.T']) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0,esk5_0) = cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE != cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEV668+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 04:05:05 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 5.93/6.33  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 5.93/6.33  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 5.93/6.33  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 5.93/6.33  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.93/6.33  % Total time : 5.990s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------