%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEV672+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:35:25 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 6.58s 12.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 8 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 4 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('_HAMMER_GOAL',conjecture,
cPLF_2eSmallstep_2emulti___24a4(cStlc_2eSTLC_2etm,cStlc_2eSTLC_2estep,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eapp___24a2(cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eArrow___24a2(cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool),cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex)),cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex))),cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','_HAMMER_GOAL') ).
fof('Stlc.STLC.step_example1',axiom,
cPLF_2eSmallstep_2emulti___24a4(cStlc_2eSTLC_2etm,cStlc_2eSTLC_2estep,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eapp___24a2(cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eArrow___24a2(cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool),cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex)),cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex))),cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','Stlc.STLC.step_example1') ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ cPLF_2eSmallstep_2emulti___24a4(cStlc_2eSTLC_2etm,cStlc_2eSTLC_2estep,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eapp___24a2(cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eArrow___24a2(cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool),cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex)),cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex))),cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex))),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['_HAMMER_GOAL']) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ cPLF_2eSmallstep_2emulti___24a4(cStlc_2eSTLC_2etm,cStlc_2eSTLC_2estep,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eapp___24a2(cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eArrow___24a2(cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool),cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex)),cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex))),cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ cPLF_2eSmallstep_2emulti___24a4(cStlc_2eSTLC_2etm,cStlc_2eSTLC_2estep,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eapp___24a2(cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eArrow___24a2(cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool),cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex)),cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex))),cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex))),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ cPLF_2eSmallstep_2emulti___24a4(cStlc_2eSTLC_2etm,cStlc_2eSTLC_2estep,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eapp___24a2(cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eArrow___24a2(cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool),cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex)),cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex))),cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
cPLF_2eSmallstep_2emulti___24a4(cStlc_2eSTLC_2etm,cStlc_2eSTLC_2estep,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eapp___24a2(cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eArrow___24a2(cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool),cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex)),cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex))),cStlc_2eSTLC_2eabs___24a3(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex,cStlc_2eSTLC_2eBool,cStlc_2eSTLC_2evar___24a1(cStlc_2eSTLC_2ex))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['Stlc.STLC.step_example1']) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SEV672+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/10.47 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.19/10.47 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/10.47 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/10.47 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/10.47 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/10.47 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/10.47 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/10.47 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:40:05 UTC 2026
% 0.19/10.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/10.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/10.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/10.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.58/12.54 % Version: 3.5.1
% 6.58/12.54 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 6.58/12.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.58/12.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 6.58/12.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 6.58/12.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 6.58/12.54 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 6.58/12.54 % new_bool_3 with pid 1917745 completed with status 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 6.58/12.54 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 6.58/12.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.58/12.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 6.58/12.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 6.58/12.54 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 6.58/12.54 % Search class: FGUSF-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 6.58/12.54 % partial match(2): FGHSS-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 6.58/12.54 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 899 seconds (899 total)
% 6.58/12.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 81s (1) cores
% 6.58/12.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 90s (1) cores
% 6.58/12.54 % Starting G-E--_042_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 68s (1) cores
% 6.58/12.54 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1917750 completed with status 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 6.58/12.54 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 6.58/12.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.58/12.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 6.58/12.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 6.58/12.54 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 6.58/12.54 % Search class: FGUSF-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 6.58/12.54 % partial match(2): FGHSS-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 6.58/12.54 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 899 seconds (899 total)
% 6.58/12.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 81s (1) cores
% 6.58/12.54 % Preprocessing time : 0.527 s
% 6.58/12.54
% 6.58/12.54 % Proof found!
% 6.58/12.54 % SZS status Theorem
% 6.58/12.54 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.58/12.54 % Parsed axioms : 3119
% 6.58/12.54 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3075
% 6.58/12.54 % Initial clauses : 16046
% 6.58/12.54 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Initial clauses in saturation : 16046
% 6.58/12.54 % Processed clauses : 293
% 6.58/12.54 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % ...subsumed : 167
% 6.58/12.54 % ...remaining for further processing : 125
% 6.58/12.54 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 36
% 6.58/12.54 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 6.58/12.54 % Generated clauses : 337
% 6.58/12.54 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 249
% 6.58/12.54 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Paramodulations : 276
% 6.58/12.54 % Factorizations : 8
% 6.58/12.54 % NegExts : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Equation resolutions : 53
% 6.58/12.54 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Total rewrite steps : 80
% 6.58/12.54 % ...of those cached : 72
% 6.58/12.54 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Propositional check models : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 6.58/12.54 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 6.58/12.54 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 6.58/12.54 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 6.58/12.54 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 6.58/12.54 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 6.58/12.54 % Current number of processed clauses : 121
% 6.58/12.54 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 6.58/12.54 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Negative unit clauses : 5
% 6.58/12.54 % Non-unit-clauses : 101
% 6.58/12.54 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16001
% 6.58/12.54 % ...number of literals in the above : 175361
% 6.58/12.54 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 6.58/12.54 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5385
% 6.58/12.54 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2192
% 6.58/12.54 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 151
% 6.58/12.54 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 6.58/12.54 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 6.58/12.54 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 6.58/12.54 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Condensation successes : 0
% 6.58/12.54 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1497829
% 6.58/12.54 % Search garbage collected termcells : 124214
% 6.58/12.54
% 6.58/12.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.58/12.54 % User time : 1.460 s
% 6.58/12.54 % System time : 0.128 s
% 6.58/12.54 % Total time : 1.588 s
% 6.58/12.54 % Maximum resident set size: 52308 pages
% 6.58/12.54
% 6.58/12.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.58/12.54 % User time : 2.840 s
% 6.58/12.54 % System time : 0.251 s
% 6.58/12.54 % Total time : 3.091 s
% 6.58/12.54 % Maximum resident set size: 12288 pages
% 6.58/12.54 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------