%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : SWB001+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n010.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:11:31 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 5.36s 1.40s % Output : Proof 8.72s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWB001+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0. % 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 06:11:19 EDT 2023 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.60 ________ _____ % 0.19/0.60 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.19/0.60 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.19/0.60 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.19/0.60 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.19/0.60 % 0.19/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.19/0.60 (2023-06-19) % 0.19/0.60 % 0.19/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.19/0.60 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.19/0.60 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.19/0.60 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.19/0.60 % 0.19/0.60 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.19/0.60 % 0.19/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.19/0.61 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.19/0.63 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 3.10/1.12 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 3.10/1.12 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 3.10/1.16 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 3.10/1.16 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 3.10/1.16 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 3.10/1.16 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 3.10/1.16 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 4.29/1.36 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.29/1.36 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.29/1.39 Prover 2: proved (768ms) % 5.36/1.40 % 5.36/1.40 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 5.36/1.40 % 5.36/1.40 Prover 5: proved (764ms) % 5.36/1.40 % 5.36/1.40 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 5.36/1.40 % 5.36/1.41 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 5.36/1.41 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 5.92/1.50 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.09/1.50 Prover 3: stopped % 6.09/1.51 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 6.09/1.51 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.09/1.51 Prover 6: stopped % 6.09/1.51 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 6.09/1.52 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 6.25/1.53 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 6.25/1.60 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 6.94/1.62 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 6.94/1.63 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.94/1.63 Prover 0: stopped % 6.94/1.64 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 6.94/1.65 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.94/1.68 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 6.94/1.68 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 6.94/1.69 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 7.51/1.70 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.51/1.70 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.51/1.75 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.05/1.81 Prover 7: Found proof (size 7) % 8.05/1.81 Prover 10: Found proof (size 7) % 8.05/1.81 Prover 7: proved (410ms) % 8.05/1.81 Prover 10: proved (303ms) % 8.05/1.81 Prover 1: stopped % 8.05/1.82 Prover 4: stopped % 8.05/1.82 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 8.05/1.82 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 8.05/1.83 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.05/1.83 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.05/1.85 Prover 13: stopped % 8.05/1.85 Prover 8: stopped % 8.65/1.88 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.72/1.91 Prover 11: stopped % 8.72/1.91 % 8.72/1.91 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 8.72/1.91 % 8.72/1.91 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 8.72/1.92 Assumptions after simplification: % 8.72/1.92 --------------------------------- % 8.72/1.92 % 8.72/1.92 (testcase_conclusion_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment) % 8.72/1.93 $i(uri_ex_p) & $i(uri_owl_onProperty) & $i(uri_owl_Restriction) & $i(uri_ex_r) % 8.72/1.93 & $i(uri_rdf_type) & ( ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty, uri_ex_r, uri_ex_p) | ~ % 8.72/1.93 iext(uri_rdf_type, uri_ex_r, uri_owl_Restriction)) % 8.72/1.93 % 8.72/1.93 (testcase_premise_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment) % 8.72/1.93 $i(uri_ex_d) & $i(uri_owl_someValuesFrom) & $i(uri_ex_c) & $i(uri_ex_p) & % 8.72/1.93 $i(uri_owl_onProperty) & $i(uri_owl_Restriction) & $i(uri_ex_r) & % 8.72/1.93 $i(uri_rdfs_subClassOf) & $i(uri_rdf_type) & iext(uri_owl_someValuesFrom, % 8.72/1.93 uri_ex_r, uri_ex_d) & iext(uri_owl_onProperty, uri_ex_r, uri_ex_p) & % 8.72/1.93 iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf, uri_ex_c, uri_ex_r) & iext(uri_rdf_type, uri_ex_r, % 8.72/1.93 uri_owl_Restriction) % 8.72/1.93 % 8.72/1.93 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 8.72/1.93 -------------------------------------------- % 8.72/1.93 rdf_collection_first_type, rdf_collection_nil_type, rdf_collection_rest_type, % 8.72/1.93 rdf_container_n_type_001, rdf_container_n_type_002, rdf_container_n_type_003, % 8.72/1.93 rdf_reification_object_type, rdf_reification_predicate_type, % 8.72/1.93 rdf_reification_subject_type, rdf_type_ip, rdf_type_type, rdf_value_type, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_annotation_comment_domain, rdfs_annotation_comment_range, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_annotation_isdefinedby_domain, rdfs_annotation_isdefinedby_range, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_annotation_isdefinedby_sub, rdfs_annotation_label_domain, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_annotation_label_range, rdfs_annotation_seealso_domain, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_annotation_seealso_range, rdfs_cext_def, rdfs_class_instsub_resource, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_collection_first_domain, rdfs_collection_first_range, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_collection_rest_domain, rdfs_collection_rest_range, rdfs_container_alt_sub, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_container_bag_sub, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_container_containermembershipproperty_instsub_member, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_container_containermembershipproperty_sub, rdfs_container_member_domain, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_container_member_range, rdfs_container_n_domain_001, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_container_n_domain_002, rdfs_container_n_domain_003, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_container_n_range_001, rdfs_container_n_range_002, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_container_n_range_003, rdfs_container_n_type_001, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_container_n_type_002, rdfs_container_n_type_003, rdfs_container_seq_sub, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_dat_xmlliteral_sub, rdfs_dat_xmlliteral_type, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_datatype_instsub_literal, rdfs_datatype_sub, rdfs_domain_domain, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_domain_main, rdfs_domain_range, rdfs_ic_def, rdfs_ir_def, rdfs_lv_def, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_property_type, rdfs_range_domain, rdfs_range_main, rdfs_range_range, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_reification_object_domain, rdfs_reification_object_range, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_reification_predicate_domain, rdfs_reification_predicate_range, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_reification_subject_domain, rdfs_reification_subject_range, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_subclassof_domain, rdfs_subclassof_main, rdfs_subclassof_range, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_subclassof_reflex, rdfs_subclassof_trans, rdfs_subpropertyof_domain, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_subpropertyof_main, rdfs_subpropertyof_range, rdfs_subpropertyof_reflex, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_subpropertyof_trans, rdfs_type_domain, rdfs_type_range, rdfs_value_domain, % 8.72/1.93 rdfs_value_range, simple_iext_property, simple_ir, simple_lv % 8.72/1.93 % 8.72/1.93 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 8.72/1.93 --------------------------------- % 8.72/1.93 % 8.72/1.93 Begin of proof % 8.72/1.93 | % 8.72/1.94 | ALPHA: (testcase_conclusion_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment) implies: % 8.72/1.94 | (1) ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty, uri_ex_r, uri_ex_p) | ~ iext(uri_rdf_type, % 8.72/1.94 | uri_ex_r, uri_owl_Restriction) % 8.72/1.94 | % 8.72/1.94 | ALPHA: (testcase_premise_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment) implies: % 8.72/1.94 | (2) iext(uri_rdf_type, uri_ex_r, uri_owl_Restriction) % 8.72/1.94 | (3) iext(uri_owl_onProperty, uri_ex_r, uri_ex_p) % 8.72/1.94 | % 8.72/1.94 | BETA: splitting (1) gives: % 8.72/1.94 | % 8.72/1.94 | Case 1: % 8.72/1.94 | | % 8.72/1.94 | | (4) ~ iext(uri_rdf_type, uri_ex_r, uri_owl_Restriction) % 8.72/1.94 | | % 8.72/1.94 | | PRED_UNIFY: (2), (4) imply: % 8.72/1.94 | | (5) $false % 8.72/1.94 | | % 8.72/1.94 | | CLOSE: (5) is inconsistent. % 8.72/1.94 | | % 8.72/1.94 | Case 2: % 8.72/1.94 | | % 8.72/1.94 | | (6) ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty, uri_ex_r, uri_ex_p) % 8.72/1.94 | | % 8.72/1.94 | | PRED_UNIFY: (3), (6) imply: % 8.72/1.94 | | (7) $false % 8.72/1.94 | | % 8.72/1.94 | | CLOSE: (7) is inconsistent. % 8.72/1.94 | | % 8.72/1.94 | End of split % 8.72/1.94 | % 8.72/1.94 End of proof % 8.72/1.94 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 8.72/1.94 % 8.72/1.94 1339ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------