↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SWB002+2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:03:20 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.60s 3.77s
% Output   : Proof 3.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SWB002+2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 11:56:53 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.60/3.77  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.60/3.77  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.60/3.77  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.60/3.77    (Not
% 3.60/3.77      (Exists fun BNODE_x => Exists fun BNODE_y => And (iext uri_ex_p BNODE_x BNODE_y) (iext uri_ex_q BNODE_y BNODE_x)))
% 3.60/3.77    True
% 3.60/3.77  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Exists fun BNODE_o => And (iext uri_ex_p uri_ex_s BNODE_o) (iext uri_ex_q BNODE_o uri_ex_s)) True
% 3.60/3.77  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (And (iext uri_ex_p uri_ex_s (skS.0 0 a)) (iext uri_ex_q (skS.0 0 a) uri_ex_s)) True
% 3.60/3.77  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (iext uri_ex_q (skS.0 0 a) uri_ex_s) True
% 3.60/3.77  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (iext uri_ex_p uri_ex_s (skS.0 0 a)) True
% 3.60/3.77  Clause #5 (by clausification #[0]): Eq (Exists fun BNODE_x => Exists fun BNODE_y => And (iext uri_ex_p BNODE_x BNODE_y) (iext uri_ex_q BNODE_y BNODE_x))
% 3.60/3.77    False
% 3.60/3.77  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Exists fun BNODE_y => And (iext uri_ex_p a BNODE_y) (iext uri_ex_q BNODE_y a)) False
% 3.60/3.77  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (And (iext uri_ex_p a a_1) (iext uri_ex_q a_1 a)) False
% 3.60/3.77  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (iext uri_ex_p a a_1) False) (Eq (iext uri_ex_q a_1 a) False)
% 3.60/3.77  Clause #9 (by superposition #[8, 4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (iext uri_ex_q (skS.0 0 a) uri_ex_s) False) (Eq False True)
% 3.60/3.77  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (iext uri_ex_q (skS.0 0 a) uri_ex_s) False
% 3.60/3.77  Clause #11 (by superposition #[10, 3]): Eq False True
% 3.60/3.77  Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): False
% 3.60/3.77  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------