%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB002+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:37:48 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 5.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 12 ( 6 ~; 2 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn 2 !; 5 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes,conjecture,
? [X21,X22] :
( iext(uri_ex_q,X22,X21)
& iext(uri_ex_p,X21,X22) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes,axiom,
? [X23] :
( iext(uri_ex_q,X23,uri_ex_s)
& iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X21,X22] :
( iext(uri_ex_q,X22,X21)
& iext(uri_ex_p,X21,X22) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X219,X220] :
( ~ iext(uri_ex_q,X220,X219)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X219,X220) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
( iext(uri_ex_q,esk19_0,uri_ex_s)
& iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,esk19_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_q,X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,esk19_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
iext(uri_ex_q,esk19_0,uri_ex_s),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_ex_q,esk19_0,uri_ex_s),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWB002+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/5.46 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.20/5.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/5.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/5.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/5.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/5.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/5.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/5.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:36:56 UTC 2026
% 0.20/5.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/5.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/5.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/5.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/5.60 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/5.60 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/5.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % new_bool_1 with pid 2047823 completed with status 9
% 0.24/5.60 % new_bool_3 with pid 2047822 completed with status 9
% 0.24/5.60 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2047821 completed with status 0
% 0.24/5.60 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.24/5.60 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/5.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/5.60 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/5.60 % Search class: FGHNS-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/5.60 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/5.60 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting H----_042_B03_F1_AE_Q4_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % H----_042_B03_F1_AE_Q4_SP_S2S with pid 2047846 completed with status 0
% 0.24/5.60 % Result found by H----_042_B03_F1_AE_Q4_SP_S2S
% 0.24/5.60 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/5.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/5.60 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/5.60 % Search class: FGHNS-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/5.60 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/5.60 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % Starting H----_042_B03_F1_AE_Q4_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.60 % Preprocessing time : 0.008 s
% 0.24/5.60
% 0.24/5.60 % Proof found!
% 0.24/5.60 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/5.60 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/5.61 % Parsed axioms : 140
% 0.24/5.61 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Initial clauses : 249
% 0.24/5.61 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 19
% 0.24/5.61 % Initial clauses in saturation : 230
% 0.24/5.61 % Processed clauses : 203
% 0.24/5.61 % ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.24/5.61 % ...subsumed : 15
% 0.24/5.61 % ...remaining for further processing : 175
% 0.24/5.61 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Generated clauses : 262
% 0.24/5.61 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 136
% 0.24/5.61 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Paramodulations : 262
% 0.24/5.61 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % NegExts : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Total rewrite steps : 135
% 0.24/5.61 % ...of those cached : 97
% 0.24/5.61 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.61 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.61 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.61 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.61 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.61 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.61 % Current number of processed clauses : 175
% 0.24/5.61 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 122
% 0.24/5.61 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.24/5.61 % Non-unit-clauses : 51
% 0.24/5.61 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 163
% 0.24/5.61 % ...number of literals in the above : 721
% 0.24/5.61 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.24/5.61 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 363
% 0.24/5.61 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 349
% 0.24/5.61 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 15
% 0.24/5.61 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 251
% 0.24/5.61 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.24/5.61 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/5.61 % Termbank termtop insertions : 17009
% 0.24/5.61 % Search garbage collected termcells : 3149
% 0.24/5.61
% 0.24/5.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/5.61 % User time : 0.034 s
% 0.24/5.61 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.24/5.61 % Total time : 0.045 s
% 0.24/5.61 % Maximum resident set size: 4280 pages
% 0.24/5.61
% 0.24/5.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/5.61 % User time : 0.148 s
% 0.24/5.61 % System time : 0.074 s
% 0.24/5.61 % Total time : 0.222 s
% 0.24/5.61 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.24/5.61 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------