%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB003+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:41 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 7 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 1 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals,conjecture,
? [X42] : iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X42),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals,axiom,
iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X42] : iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X42),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X43] : ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X43),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB003+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:36:40 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.49 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.22/0.49 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.49 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.22/0.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.22/0.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.22/0.49 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 % new_bool_3 with pid 1357364 completed with status 9
% 0.22/0.49 % new_bool_1 with pid 1357365 completed with status 9
% 0.22/0.49 % sh5l with pid 1357366 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.22/0.49 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.49 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.22/0.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.22/0.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.22/0.49 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.22/0.49 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.49 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.49 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1357393 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.22/0.49 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.49 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.22/0.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.22/0.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.22/0.49 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.22/0.49 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.49 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.49 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 % Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 % Proof found!
% 0.22/0.49 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.49 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.49 % Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.22/0.49 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 336
% 0.22/0.49 % Initial clauses : 608
% 0.22/0.49 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Initial clauses in saturation : 608
% 0.22/0.49 % Processed clauses : 192
% 0.22/0.49 % ...of these trivial : 11
% 0.22/0.49 % ...subsumed : 4
% 0.22/0.49 % ...remaining for further processing : 176
% 0.22/0.49 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.22/0.49 % Generated clauses : 82
% 0.22/0.49 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 77
% 0.22/0.49 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Paramodulations : 82
% 0.22/0.49 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Total rewrite steps : 16
% 0.22/0.49 % ...of those cached : 12
% 0.22/0.49 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 % Current number of processed clauses : 175
% 0.22/0.49 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 158
% 0.22/0.49 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.49 % Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.22/0.49 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 493
% 0.22/0.49 % ...number of literals in the above : 2899
% 0.22/0.49 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.49 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 48
% 0.22/0.49 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 45
% 0.22/0.49 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.22/0.49 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 101
% 0.22/0.49 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.22/0.49 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.22/0.49 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.49 % Termbank termtop insertions : 53103
% 0.22/0.49 % Search garbage collected termcells : 11874
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.49 % User time : 0.044 s
% 0.22/0.49 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.49 % Total time : 0.053 s
% 0.22/0.49 % Maximum resident set size: 5972 pages
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.49 % User time : 0.092 s
% 0.22/0.49 % System time : 0.056 s
% 0.22/0.49 % Total time : 0.147 s
% 0.22/0.49 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.22/0.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------