↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SWB005+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:05:14 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 58.48s 58.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 58.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12  % Problem    : SWB005+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.08/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 18:00:54 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.44/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 58.48/58.69  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.48/58.69  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 58.48/58.69  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 58.48/58.69  % Transform   :cnf
% 58.48/58.69  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 58.48/58.69  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 58.48/58.69  
% 58.48/58.69  % Result      :Theorem 58.000000s
% 58.48/58.69  % Output      :CNFRefutation 58.000000s
% 58.48/58.69  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.48/58.71  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.48/58.71  % File     : SWB005+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 58.48/58.71  % Domain   : Semantic Web
% 58.48/58.71  % Problem  : Everything is a Resource
% 58.48/58.71  % Version  : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 58.48/58.71  % English  :
% 58.48/58.71  
% 58.48/58.71  % Refs     : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 58.48/58.71  % Source   : [Sch11]
% 58.48/58.71  % Names    : 005_Everything_is_a_Resource [Sch11]
% 58.48/58.72  
% 58.48/58.72  % Status   : Theorem
% 58.48/58.72  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0
% 58.48/58.72  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   2 unt;   0 def)
% 58.48/58.72  %            Number of atoms       :   22 (   0 equ)
% 58.48/58.72  %            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
% 58.48/58.72  %            Number of connectives :   13 (   0   ~;   0   |;   7   &)
% 58.48/58.72  %                                         (   5 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 58.48/58.72  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
% 58.48/58.72  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 58.48/58.72  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 58.48/58.72  %            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   8 con; 0-0 aty)
% 58.48/58.72  %            Number of variables   :   10 (  10   !;   0   ?)
% 58.48/58.72  % SPC      : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ
% 58.48/58.72  
% 58.48/58.72  % Comments :
% 58.48/58.72  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.48/58.72  fof(simple_ir,axiom,
% 58.48/58.72      ! [X] : ir(X) ).
% 58.48/58.72  
% 58.48/58.72  fof(simple_iext_property,axiom,
% 58.48/58.72      ! [S,P,O] :
% 58.48/58.72        ( iext(P,S,O)
% 58.48/58.72       => ip(P) ) ).
% 58.48/58.72  
% 58.48/58.72  fof(rdf_type_ip,axiom,
% 58.48/58.72      ! [P] :
% 58.48/58.72        ( iext(uri_rdf_type,P,uri_rdf_Property)
% 58.48/58.72      <=> ip(P) ) ).
% 58.48/58.72  
% 58.48/58.72  fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
% 58.48/58.72      ! [X,C] :
% 58.48/58.72        ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X,C)
% 58.48/58.72      <=> icext(C,X) ) ).
% 58.48/58.72  
% 58.48/58.72  fof(rdfs_ir_def,axiom,
% 58.48/58.72      ! [X] :
% 58.48/58.72        ( ir(X)
% 58.48/58.72      <=> icext(uri_rdfs_Resource,X) ) ).
% 58.48/58.72  
% 58.48/58.72  fof(owl_class_thing_ext,axiom,
% 58.48/58.72      ! [X] :
% 58.48/58.72        ( icext(uri_owl_Thing,X)
% 58.48/58.72      <=> ir(X) ) ).
% 58.48/58.72  
% 58.48/58.72  fof(owl_class_objectproperty_ext,axiom,
% 58.48/58.72      ! [X] :
% 58.48/58.72        ( icext(uri_owl_ObjectProperty,X)
% 58.48/58.72      <=> ip(X) ) ).
% 58.48/58.72  
% 58.48/58.72  fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_005_Everything_is_a_Resource,conjecture,
% 58.48/58.72      ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_s,uri_rdfs_Resource)
% 58.48/58.72      & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_s,uri_owl_Thing)
% 58.48/58.72      & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_rdfs_Resource)
% 58.48/58.72      & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_Thing)
% 58.48/58.72      & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_rdf_Property)
% 58.48/58.72      & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_ObjectProperty)
% 58.48/58.72      & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_o,uri_rdfs_Resource)
% 58.48/58.72      & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_o,uri_owl_Thing) ) ).
% 58.48/58.72  
% 58.48/58.72  fof(testcase_premise_fullish_005_Everything_is_a_Resource,axiom,
% 58.48/58.72      iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,uri_ex_o) ).
% 58.48/58.72  
% 58.48/58.72  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.48/58.72  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.48/58.72  % Proof found
% 58.48/58.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 58.48/58.72  % SZS output start Proof
% 58.48/58.73  %ClaNum:11(EqnAxiom:0)
% 58.48/58.73  %VarNum:22(SingletonVarNum:13)
% 58.48/58.73  %MaxLitNum:8
% 58.48/58.73  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 58.48/58.73  %SharedTerms:17
% 58.48/58.73  %goalClause: 11
% 58.48/58.73  [3]P2(a3,a5,a4)
% 58.48/58.73  [1]P1(a1,x11)
% 58.48/58.73  [2]P1(a2,x21)
% 58.48/58.73  [4]~P3(x41)+P1(a6,x41)
% 58.48/58.73  [5]P3(x51)+~P1(a6,x51)
% 58.48/58.73  [6]~P3(x61)+P2(a7,x61,a8)
% 58.48/58.73  [8]P3(x81)+~P2(a7,x81,a8)
% 58.48/58.73  [7]~P1(x72,x71)+P2(a7,x71,x72)
% 58.48/58.73  [10]P1(x101,x102)+~P2(a7,x102,x101)
% 58.48/58.73  [9]P3(x91)+~P2(x91,x92,x93)
% 58.48/58.73  [11]~P2(a7,a5,a1)+~P2(a7,a5,a2)+~P2(a7,a3,a8)+~P2(a7,a3,a1)+~P2(a7,a3,a2)+~P2(a7,a3,a6)+~P2(a7,a4,a1)+~P2(a7,a4,a2)
% 58.48/58.73  %EqnAxiom
% 58.48/58.73  
% 58.48/58.73  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.63/58.74  cnf(12,plain,
% 58.63/58.74     (P1(a6,a3)),
% 58.63/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,4,9])).
% 58.63/58.74  cnf(13,plain,
% 58.63/58.74     (P3(a3)),
% 58.63/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[12,5])).
% 58.63/58.74  cnf(15,plain,
% 58.63/58.75     (P2(a7,a3,a8)),
% 58.63/58.75     inference(scs_inference,[],[12,6,5])).
% 58.63/58.75  cnf(16,plain,
% 58.63/58.75     (~P2(a7,a5,a1)+~P2(a7,a5,a2)+~P2(a7,a3,a1)+~P2(a7,a3,a2)+~P2(a7,a3,a6)+~P2(a7,a4,a1)+~P2(a7,a4,a2)),
% 58.63/58.75     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,11])).
% 58.63/58.75  cnf(19,plain,
% 58.63/58.75     (P2(a7,a3,a6)),
% 58.63/58.75     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,7,4])).
% 58.63/58.75  cnf(20,plain,
% 58.63/58.75     (~P2(a7,a5,a1)+~P2(a7,a5,a2)+~P2(a7,a3,a1)+~P2(a7,a3,a2)+~P2(a7,a4,a1)+~P2(a7,a4,a2)),
% 58.63/58.75     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,16])).
% 58.63/58.75  cnf(28,plain,
% 58.63/58.75     (P2(a7,x281,a1)),
% 58.63/58.75     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,7])).
% 58.63/58.75  cnf(30,plain,
% 58.63/58.75     (~P2(a7,a3,a2)+~P2(a7,a4,a2)+~P2(a7,a3,a1)+~P2(a7,a5,a2)+~P2(a7,a5,a1)),
% 58.63/58.75     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,20])).
% 58.63/58.75  cnf(31,plain,
% 58.63/58.75     (P2(a7,x311,a2)),
% 58.63/58.75     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,7])).
% 58.63/58.75  cnf(34,plain,
% 58.63/58.75     (~P2(a7,a4,a2)+~P2(a7,a3,a2)+~P2(a7,a5,a1)),
% 58.63/58.75     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,28,7,30])).
% 58.63/58.75  cnf(35,plain,
% 58.63/58.75     ($false),
% 58.63/58.75     inference(scs_inference,[],[31,28,2,34,7]),
% 58.63/58.75     ['proof']).
% 58.63/58.75  % SZS output end Proof
% 58.63/58.75  % Total time :58.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------