%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWB006+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n015.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:05:15 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.59s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB006+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % 0.07/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 18 17:59:54 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.19/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.19/0.59 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.19/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.19/0.59 % Transform :cnf % 0.19/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.19/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.19/0.59 % 0.19/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.19/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.19/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.19/0.59 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.19/0.59 % File : SWB006+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % 0.19/0.59 % Domain : Semantic Web % 0.19/0.59 % Problem : Literal Values represented by URIs and Blank Nodes % 0.19/0.59 % Version : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete. % 0.19/0.59 % English : % 0.19/0.59 % 0.19/0.59 % Refs : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.19/0.59 % Source : [Sch11] % 0.19/0.59 % Names : 006_Literal_Values_represented_by_URIs_and_Blank_Nodes [Sch11] % 0.19/0.59 % 0.19/0.59 % Status : Theorem % 0.19/0.59 % Rating : 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.06 v7.4.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.04 v6.2.0, 0.12 v6.1.0, 0.10 v6.0.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.11 v5.2.0 % 0.19/0.59 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 3 ( 1 unt; 0 def) % 0.19/0.59 % Number of atoms : 6 ( 1 equ) % 0.19/0.59 % Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg) % 0.19/0.59 % Number of connectives : 3 ( 0 ~; 0 |; 2 &) % 0.19/0.59 % ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.19/0.59 % Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg) % 0.19/0.59 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.19/0.59 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty) % 0.19/0.59 % Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty) % 0.19/0.59 % Number of variables : 3 ( 2 !; 1 ?) % 0.19/0.59 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ % 0.19/0.59 % 0.19/0.59 % Comments : % 0.19/0.59 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.19/0.59 fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom, % 0.19/0.59 ! [X,Y] : % 0.19/0.59 ( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X,Y) % 0.19/0.59 <=> X = Y ) ). % 0.19/0.59 % 0.19/0.59 fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_006_Literal_Values_represented_by_URIs_and_Blank_Nodes,conjecture, % 0.19/0.59 iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_w) ). % 0.19/0.59 % 0.19/0.59 fof(testcase_premise_fullish_006_Literal_Values_represented_by_URIs_and_Blank_Nodes,axiom, % 0.19/0.59 ? [BNODE_x] : % 0.19/0.59 ( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_u,literal_plain(dat_str_abc)) % 0.19/0.59 & iext(uri_owl_sameAs,BNODE_x,literal_plain(dat_str_abc)) % 0.19/0.59 & iext(uri_owl_sameAs,BNODE_x,uri_ex_w) ) ). % 0.19/0.59 % 0.19/0.59 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.19/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.19/0.59 % Proof found % 0.19/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.19/0.59 % SZS output start Proof % 0.19/0.59 %ClaNum:13(EqnAxiom:7) % 0.19/0.59 %VarNum:8(SingletonVarNum:4) % 0.19/0.59 %MaxLitNum:2 % 0.19/0.59 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.19/0.59 %SharedTerms:10 % 0.19/0.59 %goalClause: 11 % 0.19/0.59 %singleGoalClaCount:1 % 0.19/0.59 [8]P1(a1,a2,a4) % 0.19/0.59 [11]~P1(a1,a5,a4) % 0.19/0.59 [9]P1(a1,a5,f6(a3)) % 0.19/0.59 [10]P1(a1,a2,f6(a3)) % 0.19/0.59 [12]~E(x121,x122)+P1(a1,x121,x122) % 0.19/0.59 [13]E(x131,x132)+~P1(a1,x131,x132) % 0.19/0.59 %EqnAxiom % 0.19/0.59 [1]E(x11,x11) % 0.19/0.59 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22) % 0.19/0.59 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33) % 0.19/0.59 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f6(x41),f6(x42)) % 0.19/0.59 [5]P1(x52,x53,x54)+~E(x51,x52)+~P1(x51,x53,x54) % 0.19/0.59 [6]P1(x63,x62,x64)+~E(x61,x62)+~P1(x63,x61,x64) % 0.19/0.59 [7]P1(x73,x74,x72)+~E(x71,x72)+~P1(x73,x74,x71) % 0.19/0.59 % 0.19/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.19/0.60 cnf(14,plain, % 0.19/0.60 (P1(a1,x141,x141)), % 0.19/0.60 inference(equality_inference,[],[12])). % 0.19/0.60 cnf(19,plain, % 0.19/0.60 (E(a4,a2)), % 0.19/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,8,12,13,2])). % 0.19/0.60 cnf(23,plain, % 0.19/0.60 (~E(f6(a3),a4)), % 0.19/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,14,8,9,12,13,2,6,3,7])). % 0.19/0.60 cnf(29,plain, % 0.19/0.60 (E(a4,f6(a3))), % 0.19/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[19,10,13,2,3])). % 0.19/0.60 cnf(36,plain, % 0.19/0.60 ($false), % 0.19/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,29,9,13,2]), % 0.19/0.60 ['proof']). % 0.19/0.60 % SZS output end Proof % 0.19/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------