%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB007+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:37:54 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.02s 0.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.02s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 30 ( 5 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 26 ( 10 ~; 7 |; 8 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 9 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_007_Equal_Classes,conjecture,
( iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_007_Equal_Classes) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X4,X7)
<=> X4 = X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_007_Equal_Classes,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c1)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c1)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c1)
& iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_007_Equal_Classes) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_007_Equal_Classes]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X95,X96] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X95,X96)
| X95 != X96 )
& ( X95 = X96
| ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X95,X96) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_sameas])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c2) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_007_Equal_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
uri_ex_c2 = uri_ex_c1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_007_Equal_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_007_Equal_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_007_Equal_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_9]),c_0_11]),c_0_9]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB007+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:37:26 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.02/0.65 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.02/0.65 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.02/0.65 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.02/0.65 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.02/0.65 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.02/0.65 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.02/0.65 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.02/0.65 % sh5l with pid 1359024 completed with status 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Result found by sh5l
% 1.02/0.65 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.02/0.65 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.02/0.65 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.02/0.65 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.02/0.65 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.02/0.65 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.02/0.65 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 1.02/0.65 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.02/0.65 % Search class: FGHSF-FMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 1.02/0.65 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.02/0.65 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.02/0.65 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1359038 completed with status 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.02/0.65 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.02/0.65 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.02/0.65 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.02/0.65 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.02/0.65 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.02/0.65 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.02/0.65 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 1.02/0.65 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.02/0.65 % Search class: FGHSF-FMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 1.02/0.65 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.02/0.65 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.02/0.65 % Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 1.02/0.65
% 1.02/0.65 % Proof found!
% 1.02/0.65 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.02/0.65 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.02/0.65 % Parsed axioms : 560
% 1.02/0.65 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 224
% 1.02/0.65 % Initial clauses : 940
% 1.02/0.65 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 40
% 1.02/0.65 % Initial clauses in saturation : 900
% 1.02/0.65 % Processed clauses : 1540
% 1.02/0.65 % ...of these trivial : 60
% 1.02/0.65 % ...subsumed : 323
% 1.02/0.65 % ...remaining for further processing : 1156
% 1.02/0.65 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 1.02/0.65 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Backward-subsumed : 6
% 1.02/0.65 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 1.02/0.65 % Generated clauses : 3671
% 1.02/0.65 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2857
% 1.02/0.65 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 1.02/0.65 % Paramodulations : 3670
% 1.02/0.65 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.02/0.65 % NegExts : 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 1.02/0.65 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Total rewrite steps : 1306
% 1.02/0.65 % ...of those cached : 1108
% 1.02/0.65 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.02/0.65 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.02/0.65 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.02/0.65 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.02/0.65 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.02/0.65 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.02/0.65 % Current number of processed clauses : 1147
% 1.02/0.65 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 440
% 1.02/0.65 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Negative unit clauses : 18
% 1.02/0.65 % Non-unit-clauses : 689
% 1.02/0.65 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2217
% 1.02/0.65 % ...number of literals in the above : 7819
% 1.02/0.65 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 1.02/0.65 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 57785
% 1.02/0.65 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 55311
% 1.02/0.65 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 184
% 1.02/0.65 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3397
% 1.02/0.65 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.02/0.65 % BW rewrite match attempts : 133
% 1.02/0.65 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 1.02/0.65 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.02/0.65 % Termbank termtop insertions : 108353
% 1.02/0.65 % Search garbage collected termcells : 17074
% 1.02/0.65
% 1.02/0.65 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.02/0.65 % User time : 0.179 s
% 1.02/0.65 % System time : 0.022 s
% 1.02/0.65 % Total time : 0.201 s
% 1.02/0.65 % Maximum resident set size: 6952 pages
% 1.02/0.65
% 1.02/0.65 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.02/0.65 % User time : 0.194 s
% 1.02/0.65 % System time : 0.026 s
% 1.02/0.65 % Total time : 0.220 s
% 1.02/0.65 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 1.02/0.65 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------