%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB008+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:48 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 5.82s 2.08s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 61 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 61 ( 24 ~; 22 |; 11 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 8 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn 17 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(owl_char_inversefunctional,axiom,
! [X2] :
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X2)
<=> ( ! [X37,X38,X7] :
( ( iext(X2,X38,X7)
& iext(X2,X37,X7) )
=> X37 = X38 )
& ip(X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_char_inversefunctional) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties,axiom,
( iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_robert,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz))
& iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_bob,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz))
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties) ).
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X4,X7)
<=> X4 = X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X48,X49] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49)
| ~ icext(X49,X48) )
& ( icext(X49,X48)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X1038,X1039,X1040,X1041,X1042] :
( ( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1042)
| ~ ip(X1042)
| esk166_1(X1042) != esk167_1(X1042) )
& ( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1042)
| ~ ip(X1042)
| iext(X1042,esk167_1(X1042),esk168_1(X1042)) )
& ( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1042)
| ~ ip(X1042)
| iext(X1042,esk166_1(X1042),esk168_1(X1042)) )
& ( ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1038)
| X1039 = X1040
| ~ iext(X1038,X1040,X1041)
| ~ iext(X1038,X1039,X1041) )
& ( ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1038)
| ip(X1038) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_char_inversefunctional])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| icext(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| ~ iext(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| X2 = X4 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,X1,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,X2,X3)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_robert,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X839,X840] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X839,X840)
| X839 != X840 )
& ( X839 = X840
| ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X839,X840) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_sameas])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,X1,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz))
| X1 = uri_ex_robert ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_bob,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( X1 != X2
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
uri_ex_robert = uri_ex_bob,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWB008+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.53 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.53 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.53 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.53 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.53 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.53 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.53 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.53 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:42:24 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.53 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.53 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.58 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.58 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.82/2.08 % Version: 3.5.1
% 5.82/2.08 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.82/2.08 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.82/2.08 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 5.82/2.08 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.82/2.08 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.82/2.08 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 5.82/2.08 % new_bool_3 with pid 1923051 completed with status 9
% 5.82/2.08 % new_bool_1 with pid 1923052 completed with status 9
% 5.82/2.08 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 1923050 completed with status 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 5.82/2.08 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.82/2.08 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.82/2.08 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 5.82/2.08 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 5.82/2.08 % No SInE strategy applied
% 5.82/2.08 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 5.82/2.08 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 5.82/2.08 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 5.82/2.08 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 5.82/2.08 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 5.82/2.08 % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
% 5.82/2.08 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 1923082 completed with status 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 5.82/2.08 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.82/2.08 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.82/2.08 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 5.82/2.08 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 5.82/2.08 % No SInE strategy applied
% 5.82/2.08 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 5.82/2.08 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 5.82/2.08 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 5.82/2.08 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 5.82/2.08 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 5.82/2.08 % Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 5.82/2.08
% 5.82/2.08 % Proof found!
% 5.82/2.08 % SZS status Theorem
% 5.82/2.08 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.82/2.08 % Parsed axioms : 560
% 5.82/2.08 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Initial clauses : 1271
% 5.82/2.08 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 5.82/2.08 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1160
% 5.82/2.08 % Processed clauses : 9384
% 5.82/2.08 % ...of these trivial : 1478
% 5.82/2.08 % ...subsumed : 3072
% 5.82/2.08 % ...remaining for further processing : 4834
% 5.82/2.08 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 5.82/2.08 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Backward-subsumed : 33
% 5.82/2.08 % Backward-rewritten : 8
% 5.82/2.08 % Generated clauses : 25679
% 5.82/2.08 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19767
% 5.82/2.08 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 26
% 5.82/2.08 % Paramodulations : 25661
% 5.82/2.08 % Factorizations : 2
% 5.82/2.08 % NegExts : 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Equation resolutions : 16
% 5.82/2.08 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Total rewrite steps : 19443
% 5.82/2.08 % ...of those cached : 18075
% 5.82/2.08 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Propositional check models : 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 5.82/2.08 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 5.82/2.08 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 5.82/2.08 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 5.82/2.08 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 5.82/2.08 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 5.82/2.08 % Current number of processed clauses : 4777
% 5.82/2.08 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2227
% 5.82/2.08 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Negative unit clauses : 7
% 5.82/2.08 % Non-unit-clauses : 2543
% 5.82/2.08 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11529
% 5.82/2.08 % ...number of literals in the above : 56804
% 5.82/2.08 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Current number of archived clauses : 42
% 5.82/2.08 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1183465
% 5.82/2.08 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 508766
% 5.82/2.08 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3114
% 5.82/2.08 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 562395
% 5.82/2.08 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 5.82/2.08 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1495
% 5.82/2.08 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 5.82/2.08 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Condensation successes : 0
% 5.82/2.08 % Termbank termtop insertions : 459905
% 5.82/2.08 % Search garbage collected termcells : 19088
% 5.82/2.08
% 5.82/2.08 % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.82/2.08 % User time : 1.410 s
% 5.82/2.08 % System time : 0.050 s
% 5.82/2.08 % Total time : 1.460 s
% 5.82/2.08 % Maximum resident set size: 7712 pages
% 5.82/2.08
% 5.82/2.08 % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.82/2.08 % User time : 4.172 s
% 5.82/2.08 % System time : 0.212 s
% 5.82/2.08 % Total time : 4.384 s
% 5.82/2.08 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 5.82/2.08 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------