%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWB008+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:04:22 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 245.69s 42.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 245.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 17 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 107 ( 20 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 116 ( 45 ~; 40 |; 25 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 8 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 63 ( 0 sgn 54 !; 9 ?; 9 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f25,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X0,X1)
<=> icext(X1,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(f354,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X0,X1)
<=> X0 = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(f394,axiom,
! [X0] :
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X0)
<=> ( ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( iext(X0,X2,X3)
& iext(X0,X1,X3) )
=> X1 = X2 )
& ip(X0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_char_inversefunctional) ).
fof(f559,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties) ).
fof(f560,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f559]) ).
fof(f561,axiom,
( iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_robert,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz))
& iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_bob,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz))
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties) ).
fof(f572,plain,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
inference(flattening,[],[f560]) ).
fof(f850,plain,
! [X0] :
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X0)
<=> ( ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ iext(X0,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X0,X1,X3)
| X1 = X2 )
& ip(X0) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f394]) ).
fof(f851,plain,
! [X0] :
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X0)
<=> ( ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ iext(X0,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X0,X1,X3)
| X1 = X2 )
& ip(X0) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f850]) ).
fof(f1061,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X0,X1)
| icext(X1,X0) )
& ( ~ icext(X1,X0)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X0,X1) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).
fof(f1362,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X0,X1)
| X0 = X1 )
& ( X0 != X1
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X0,X1) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f354]) ).
fof(f1419,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X0)
| ( ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ iext(X0,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X0,X1,X3)
| X1 = X2 )
& ip(X0) ) )
& ( ? [X1,X2,X3] :
( iext(X0,X2,X3)
& iext(X0,X1,X3)
& X1 != X2 )
| ~ ip(X0)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X0) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f851]) ).
fof(f1420,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X0)
| ( ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ iext(X0,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X0,X1,X3)
| X1 = X2 )
& ip(X0) ) )
& ( ? [X1,X2,X3] :
( iext(X0,X2,X3)
& iext(X0,X1,X3)
& X1 != X2 )
| ~ ip(X0)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X0) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f1419]) ).
fof(f1421,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X0)
| ( ! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ iext(X0,X5,X6)
| ~ iext(X0,X4,X6)
| X4 = X5 )
& ip(X0) ) )
& ( ? [X1,X2,X3] :
( iext(X0,X2,X3)
& iext(X0,X1,X3)
& X1 != X2 )
| ~ ip(X0)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X0) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f1420]) ).
fof(f1422,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X0)
| ( ! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ iext(X0,X5,X6)
| ~ iext(X0,X4,X6)
| X4 = X5 )
& ip(X0) ) )
& ( ( iext(X0,sK226(X0),sK227(X0))
& iext(X0,sK225(X0),sK227(X0))
& sK225(X0) != sK226(X0) )
| ~ ip(X0)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK225,sK226,sK227]),skolemize(X1,sK225(X0)),skolemize(X2,sK226(X0)),skolemize(X3,sK227(X0))],[f1421]) ).
fof(f1485,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X0,X1)
| icext(X1,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1061]) ).
fof(f2397,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( X0 != X1
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1362]) ).
fof(f2516,plain,
! [X0,X6,X4,X5] :
( ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X0)
| ~ iext(X0,X5,X6)
| ~ iext(X0,X4,X6)
| X4 = X5 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1422]) ).
fof(f2749,plain,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f572]) ).
fof(f2750,plain,
iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_robert,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f561]) ).
fof(f2751,plain,
iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_bob,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f561]) ).
fof(f2752,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f561]) ).
fof(f2761,plain,
! [X1] : iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f2397]) ).
tcf(c_75,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( icext(X1,X0)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1485]) ).
tcf(c_981,plain,
! [X0: $i] : iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X0,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2761]) ).
tcf(c_1097,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( X1 = X3 )
| ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X0)
| ~ iext(X0,X3,X2)
| ~ iext(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2516]) ).
tcf(c_1326,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2749]) ).
tcf(c_1328,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2752]) ).
tcf(c_1329,plain,
iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_bob,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2751]) ).
tcf(c_1330,plain,
iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_robert,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2750]) ).
tcf(c_2417,plain,
icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1328,c_75]) ).
tcf(c_2441,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( X0 = uri_ex_robert )
| ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum)
| ~ iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,X0,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1330,c_1097]) ).
tcf(c_2453,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( X0 = uri_ex_robert )
| ~ iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,X0,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_2441,c_2417,c_2441]) ).
tcf(c_2597,plain,
uri_ex_bob = uri_ex_robert,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1329,c_2453]) ).
tcf(c_2624,plain,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_robert,uri_ex_robert),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2597,c_1326]) ).
tcf(c_2631,plain,
$false,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_981,c_2624]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB008+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/5.38 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 15:23:45 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/5.38 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.43
% 0.15/5.43 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/5.43
% 0.15/5.43 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/5.44 % Proving...
% 245.69/42.63 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 245.69/42.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63 % ------ iProver source info
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 245.69/42.63 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 245.69/42.63 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63 % ------ Parsing...
% 245.69/42.63 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e %
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63 % ------ Preprocessing...%
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 245.69/42.63 % ------ Proving...
% 245.69/42.63 % ------ Problem Properties
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63 %
% 245.69/42.63 % clauses 1183
% 245.69/42.63 % conjectures 1
% 245.69/42.63 % EPR 720
% 245.69/42.63 % Horn 913
% 245.69/42.63 % unary 213
% 245.69/42.63 % binary 465
% 245.69/42.63 % lits 3828
% 245.69/42.63 % lits eq 197
% 245.69/42.63 % fd_pure 0
% 245.69/42.63 % fd_pseudo 0
% 245.69/42.63 % fd_cond 0
% 245.69/42.63 % fd_pseudo_cond 66
% 245.69/42.63 % AC symbols 0
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63 % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63 % ------
% 245.69/42.63 % Current options:
% 245.69/42.63 % ------
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63 %
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63 % ------ Proving...
% 245.69/42.63 %
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 245.69/42.63
% 245.69/42.63
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------