↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SWB008+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:05:17 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.53s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SWB008+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 17:38:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.48/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.64  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.53/0.64  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.64  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.53/0.64  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.53/0.64  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.53/0.64  
% 0.53/0.64  % Result      :Theorem 0.040000s
% 0.53/0.64  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.040000s
% 0.53/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  % File     : SWB008+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.53/0.65  % Domain   : Semantic Web
% 0.53/0.65  % Problem  : Inverse Functional Data Properties
% 0.53/0.65  % Version  : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 0.53/0.65  % English  :
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  % Refs     : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.53/0.65  % Source   : [Sch11]
% 0.53/0.65  % Names    : 008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties [Sch11]
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.53/0.65  % Rating   : 0.17 v8.2.0, 0.14 v8.1.0, 0.08 v7.5.0, 0.09 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.04 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.12 v6.1.0, 0.07 v6.0.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.11 v5.2.0
% 0.53/0.65  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   1 unt;   0 def)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Number of atoms       :   14 (   2 equ)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Number of connectives :    9 (   0   ~;   0   |;   5   &)
% 0.53/0.65  %                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   8 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Number of variables   :    8 (   8   !;   0   ?)
% 0.53/0.65  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  % Comments :
% 0.53/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
% 0.53/0.65      ! [X,C] :
% 0.53/0.65        ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X,C)
% 0.53/0.65      <=> icext(C,X) ) ).
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
% 0.53/0.65      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.53/0.65        ( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X,Y)
% 0.53/0.65      <=> X = Y ) ).
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  fof(owl_char_inversefunctional,axiom,
% 0.53/0.65      ! [P] :
% 0.53/0.65        ( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,P)
% 0.53/0.65      <=> ( ip(P)
% 0.53/0.65          & ! [X1,X2,Y] :
% 0.53/0.65              ( ( iext(P,X1,Y)
% 0.53/0.65                & iext(P,X2,Y) )
% 0.53/0.65             => X1 = X2 ) ) ) ).
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties,conjecture,
% 0.53/0.65      iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert) ).
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  fof(testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties,axiom,
% 0.53/0.65      ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty)
% 0.53/0.65      & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)
% 0.53/0.65      & iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_bob,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz))
% 0.53/0.65      & iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_robert,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)) ) ).
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  % Proof found
% 0.53/0.65  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.65  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.53/0.65  %ClaNum:27(EqnAxiom:13)
% 0.53/0.65  %VarNum:41(SingletonVarNum:16)
% 0.53/0.65  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.53/0.65  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.53/0.65  %SharedTerms:14
% 0.53/0.65  %goalClause: 18
% 0.53/0.65  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.53/0.65  [14]P1(a1,a2,a10)
% 0.53/0.65  [15]P1(a1,a2,a11)
% 0.53/0.65  [18]~P1(a12,a3,a9)
% 0.53/0.65  [16]P1(a2,a3,f5(a4))
% 0.53/0.65  [17]P1(a2,a9,f5(a4))
% 0.53/0.65  [19]P3(x191)+~P2(a10,x191)
% 0.53/0.65  [21]~E(x211,x212)+P1(a12,x211,x212)
% 0.53/0.65  [22]~P2(x222,x221)+P1(a1,x221,x222)
% 0.53/0.65  [23]E(x231,x232)+~P1(a12,x231,x232)
% 0.53/0.65  [26]P2(x261,x262)+~P1(a1,x262,x261)
% 0.53/0.65  [20]~P3(x201)+~E(f6(x201),f7(x201))+P2(a10,x201)
% 0.53/0.65  [24]~P3(x241)+P1(x241,f6(x241),f8(x241))+P2(a10,x241)
% 0.53/0.65  [25]~P3(x251)+P1(x251,f7(x251),f8(x251))+P2(a10,x251)
% 0.53/0.65  [27]~P1(x273,x271,x274)+E(x271,x272)+~P1(x273,x272,x274)+~P2(a10,x273)
% 0.53/0.65  %EqnAxiom
% 0.53/0.65  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.53/0.65  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.53/0.65  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.53/0.65  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f5(x41),f5(x42))
% 0.53/0.65  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f8(x51),f8(x52))
% 0.53/0.65  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f6(x61),f6(x62))
% 0.53/0.65  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f7(x71),f7(x72))
% 0.53/0.65  [8]P1(x82,x83,x84)+~E(x81,x82)+~P1(x81,x83,x84)
% 0.53/0.65  [9]P1(x93,x92,x94)+~E(x91,x92)+~P1(x93,x91,x94)
% 0.53/0.65  [10]P1(x103,x104,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P1(x103,x104,x101)
% 0.53/0.65  [11]P2(x112,x113)+~E(x111,x112)+~P2(x111,x113)
% 0.53/0.65  [12]P2(x123,x122)+~E(x121,x122)+~P2(x123,x121)
% 0.53/0.65  [13]~P3(x131)+P3(x132)+~E(x131,x132)
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  cnf(29,plain,
% 0.53/0.65     (~E(a3,a9)),
% 0.53/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,21])).
% 0.53/0.65  cnf(31,plain,
% 0.53/0.65     (P2(a10,a2)),
% 0.53/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,14,21,26])).
% 0.53/0.65  cnf(86,plain,
% 0.53/0.65     ($false),
% 0.53/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[29,31,17,16,3,27]),
% 0.53/0.65     ['proof']).
% 0.53/0.65  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.53/0.65  % Total time :0.040000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------