%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SWB008+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:23 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB008+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0. % 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 02:46:41 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.13/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.13/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.13/0.37 # % 0.13/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.13/0.37 # Number of axioms: 14 Number of unprocessed: 14 % 0.13/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.13/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.13/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.13/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.13/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.13/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.13/0.37 # 14 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.13/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.13/0.37 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.13/0.37 # Found 6 unit axioms. % 0.13/0.37 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.13/0.37 # 8 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.13/0.37 # 6 unit axiom clauses % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.13/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.13/0.37 # Creating equality axioms % 0.13/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.13/0.37 # Returning from population with 18 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.13/0.37 # We now have 18 tableaux to operate on % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_bob,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_robert,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (X1=X2|~iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (ip(X1)|~icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)|~icext(X2,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (icext(X1,X2)|~iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)|esk2_1(X1)!=esk1_1(X1)|~ip(X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)|iext(X1,esk1_1(X1),esk3_1(X1))|~ip(X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)|iext(X1,esk2_1(X1),esk3_1(X1))|~ip(X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X1=X2|~icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X3)|~iext(X3,X2,X4)|~iext(X3,X1,X4))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (X19=X19)). % 0.13/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.37 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # Found 4 steps % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_122, plain, (icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_126, plain, (ip(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_126, ...])). % 0.13/0.37 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.37 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_bob,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_robert,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (X1=X2|~iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (ip(X1)|~icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)|~icext(X2,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (icext(X1,X2)|~iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)|esk2_1(X1)!=esk1_1(X1)|~ip(X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)|iext(X1,esk1_1(X1),esk3_1(X1))|~ip(X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)|iext(X1,esk2_1(X1),esk3_1(X1))|~ip(X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X1=X2|~icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X3)|~iext(X3,X2,X4)|~iext(X3,X1,X4))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (X19=X19)). % 0.13/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.37 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # Found 7 steps % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_4])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_74, plain, (uri_owl_sameAs=uri_owl_sameAs), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_42])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_144, plain, (iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_10])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_146, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_38])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_147, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_38])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_148, plain, (~iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_148, ...])). % 0.13/0.37 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.37 # Child (1300) has found a proof. % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # Proof search is over... % 0.13/0.37 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------