%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWB010+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:20:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.95s 2.22s
% Output : Refutation 1.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SWB010+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 14:30:21 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.35 Wed Jun 1 14:30:21 2022
% 0.19/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 2414.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.35 30 back subsumes 4.
% 0.19/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 39 during input processing: 0 [copy,39,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.54 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.54 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.54 number of clauses in intial UL: 28
% 0.19/0.54 number of clauses initially in problem: 38
% 0.19/0.54 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 73
% 0.19/0.54 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 83
% 0.19/0.54 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.54 absolute distinct symbol count: 30
% 0.19/0.54 distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.19/0.54 distinct function count: 3
% 0.19/0.54 distinct constant count: 21
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.95/2.22 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.95/2.22 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Model 2 [ 3 1 2671 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Model 3 [ 1 0 3368 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Model 4 [ 1 1 3238 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Model 5 [ 5 1 11159 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Model 6 [ 5 1 21903 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Model 7 [ 5 1 14187 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Model 8 [ 5 2 37364 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Model 9 [ 6 1 7643 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 1.83 sec ----> 1339 [hyper,1333,9,35,78] {-} $F.
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Length of proof is 14. Level of proof is 6.
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.95/2.22 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.95/2.22 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 1 [] {+} -iext(uri_rdf_type,A,B)|icext(B,A).
% 1.95/2.22 2 [] {+} iext(uri_rdf_type,A,B)| -icext(B,A).
% 1.95/2.22 3 [] {+} -iext(uri_owl_sourceIndividual,A,B)|icext(uri_owl_NegativePropertyAssertion,A).
% 1.95/2.22 6 [] {+} -iext(uri_owl_onProperty,A,B)|ip(B).
% 1.95/2.22 9 [] {+} -iext(uri_owl_complementOf,A,B)| -icext(A,C)| -icext(B,C).
% 1.95/2.22 13 [] {+} -iext(uri_rdf_first,A,B)| -iext(uri_rdf_rest,A,uri_rdf_nil)| -iext(uri_owl_oneOf,C,A)|icext(C,D)|D!=B.
% 1.95/2.22 16 [] {+} -iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,A,B)| -iext(uri_owl_onProperty,A,C)| -icext(A,D)| -iext(C,D,E)|icext(B,E).
% 1.95/2.22 19 [] {+} -ir(A)| -ip(B)| -ir(C)|iext(B,A,C)|iext(uri_owl_sourceIndividual,$f3(B,A,C),A).
% 1.95/2.22 20 [] {+} -ir(A)| -ip(B)| -ir(C)|iext(B,A,C)|iext(uri_owl_assertionProperty,$f3(B,A,C),B).
% 1.95/2.22 21 [] {+} -ir(A)| -ip(B)| -ir(C)|iext(B,A,C)|iext(uri_owl_targetIndividual,$f3(B,A,C),C).
% 1.95/2.22 22 [] {+} -iext(uri_rdf_type,A,uri_owl_NegativePropertyAssertion)| -iext(uri_owl_sourceIndividual,A,uri_ex_s)| -iext(uri_owl_assertionProperty,A,uri_ex_p)| -iext(uri_owl_targetIndividual,A,uri_ex_o).
% 1.95/2.22 30 [] {-} ir(A).
% 1.95/2.22 32 [] {+} iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_s,$c4).
% 1.95/2.22 33 [] {-} iext(uri_owl_onProperty,$c4,uri_ex_p).
% 1.95/2.22 34 [] {+} iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,$c4,$c3).
% 1.95/2.22 35 [] {-} iext(uri_owl_complementOf,$c3,$c2).
% 1.95/2.22 36 [] {+} iext(uri_owl_oneOf,$c2,$c1).
% 1.95/2.22 37 [] {+} iext(uri_rdf_first,$c1,uri_ex_o).
% 1.95/2.22 38 [] {+} iext(uri_rdf_rest,$c1,uri_rdf_nil).
% 1.95/2.22 39 [] {+} A=A.
% 1.95/2.22 40 [hyper,33,6] {+} ip(uri_ex_p).
% 1.95/2.22 56 [hyper,40,21,30,30] {-} iext(uri_ex_p,A,B)|iext(uri_owl_targetIndividual,$f3(uri_ex_p,A,B),B).
% 1.95/2.22 57 [hyper,40,20,30,30] {-} iext(uri_ex_p,A,B)|iext(uri_owl_assertionProperty,$f3(uri_ex_p,A,B),uri_ex_p).
% 1.95/2.22 58 [hyper,40,19,30,30] {-} iext(uri_ex_p,A,B)|iext(uri_owl_sourceIndividual,$f3(uri_ex_p,A,B),A).
% 1.95/2.22 60 [hyper,32,1] {-} icext($c4,uri_ex_s).
% 1.95/2.22 78 [hyper,38,13,37,36,39] {+} icext($c2,uri_ex_o).
% 1.95/2.22 533 [hyper,57,16,34,33,60] {-} iext(uri_owl_assertionProperty,$f3(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,A),uri_ex_p)|icext($c3,A).
% 1.95/2.22 546 [hyper,533,9,35,78] {-} iext(uri_owl_assertionProperty,$f3(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,uri_ex_o),uri_ex_p).
% 1.95/2.22 693 [hyper,58,16,34,33,60] {-} iext(uri_owl_sourceIndividual,$f3(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,A),uri_ex_s)|icext($c3,A).
% 1.95/2.22 695 [hyper,58,3] {-} iext(uri_ex_p,A,B)|icext(uri_owl_NegativePropertyAssertion,$f3(uri_ex_p,A,B)).
% 1.95/2.22 705 [hyper,693,9,35,78] {-} iext(uri_owl_sourceIndividual,$f3(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,uri_ex_o),uri_ex_s).
% 1.95/2.22 788 [hyper,695,2] {-} iext(uri_ex_p,A,B)|iext(uri_rdf_type,$f3(uri_ex_p,A,B),uri_owl_NegativePropertyAssertion).
% 1.95/2.22 1318 [hyper,788,22,705,546,56,factor_simp] {+} iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,uri_ex_o).
% 1.95/2.22 1333 [hyper,1318,16,34,33,60] {+} icext($c3,uri_ex_o).
% 1.95/2.22 1339 [hyper,1333,9,35,78] {-} $F.
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.95/2.22 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 ============ end of search ============
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 true clauses given 32 (37.6%)
% 1.95/2.22 false clauses given 53
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 FALSE TRUE
% 1.95/2.22 6 1 3
% 1.95/2.22 7 5 36
% 1.95/2.22 8 0 1
% 1.95/2.22 9 0 16
% 1.95/2.22 10 4 32
% 1.95/2.22 11 0 10
% 1.95/2.22 12 1 8
% 1.95/2.22 13 2 63
% 1.95/2.22 14 10 77
% 1.95/2.22 15 1 1
% 1.95/2.22 16 2 4
% 1.95/2.22 17 8 15
% 1.95/2.22 18 8 18
% 1.95/2.22 19 1 29
% 1.95/2.22 20 0 17
% 1.95/2.22 21 0 45
% 1.95/2.22 22 0 172
% 1.95/2.22 23 0 16
% 1.95/2.22 24 0 8
% 1.95/2.22 25 0 98
% 1.95/2.22 26 0 234
% 1.95/2.22 28 0 12
% 1.95/2.22 29 0 12
% 1.95/2.22 30 0 156
% 1.95/2.22 32 0 5
% 1.95/2.22 34 0 72
% 1.95/2.22 tot: 43 1160 (96.4% true)
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Model 9 [ 6 1 7643 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.95/2.22
% 1.95/2.22 Process 2414 finished Wed Jun 1 14:30:23 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------