%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB011+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:37:59 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.50s 1.00s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 46 ( 18 ~; 16 |; 10 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_eqdis_disjointwith,axiom,
! [X13,X15] :
( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X13,X15)
<=> ( ! [X4] :
~ ( icext(X15,X4)
& icext(X13,X4) )
& ic(X15)
& ic(X13) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_disjointwith) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_ObjectProperty)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_Class)
& iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_owl_Class,uri_owl_ObjectProperty) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X808,X809,X810,X811,X812] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X811,X812)
| ~ ic(X812)
| ~ ic(X811)
| icext(X812,esk115_2(X811,X812)) )
& ( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X811,X812)
| ~ ic(X812)
| ~ ic(X811)
| icext(X811,esk115_2(X811,X812)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X808,X809)
| ~ icext(X809,X810)
| ~ icext(X808,X810) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X808,X809)
| ic(X809) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X808,X809)
| ic(X808) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_disjointwith])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X48,X49] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49)
| ~ icext(X49,X48) )
& ( icext(X49,X48)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X1,X3)
| ~ icext(X3,X2)
| ~ icext(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_owl_Class,uri_owl_ObjectProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| icext(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_ObjectProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_Class),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ icext(uri_owl_Class,X1)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_ObjectProperty,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
icext(uri_owl_ObjectProperty,uri_ex_x),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
icext(uri_owl_Class,uri_ex_x),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB011+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:40:00 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.50/1.00 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.50/1.00 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.50/1.00 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.50/1.00 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.50/1.00 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.50/1.00 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.50/1.00 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.50/1.00 % new_bool_1 with pid 3765090 completed with status 9
% 1.50/1.00 % new_bool_3 with pid 3765089 completed with status 9
% 1.50/1.00 % sh5l with pid 3765091 completed with status 9
% 1.50/1.00 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 3765088 completed with status 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 1.50/1.00 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.50/1.00 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.50/1.00 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.50/1.00 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.50/1.00 % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.50/1.00 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 1.50/1.00 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 1.50/1.00 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 1.50/1.00 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 1.50/1.00 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 1.50/1.00 % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
% 1.50/1.00 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 3765178 completed with status 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 1.50/1.00 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.50/1.00 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.50/1.00 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.50/1.00 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.50/1.00 % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.50/1.00 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 1.50/1.00 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 1.50/1.00 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 1.50/1.00 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 1.50/1.00 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 1.50/1.00 % Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 1.50/1.00
% 1.50/1.00 % Proof found!
% 1.50/1.00 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.50/1.00 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.50/1.00 % Parsed axioms : 559
% 1.50/1.00 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Initial clauses : 1269
% 1.50/1.00 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 1.50/1.00 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1158
% 1.50/1.00 % Processed clauses : 2680
% 1.50/1.00 % ...of these trivial : 144
% 1.50/1.00 % ...subsumed : 322
% 1.50/1.00 % ...remaining for further processing : 2214
% 1.50/1.00 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 1.50/1.00 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Backward-subsumed : 26
% 1.50/1.00 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Generated clauses : 6341
% 1.50/1.00 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5538
% 1.50/1.00 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 16
% 1.50/1.00 % Paramodulations : 6325
% 1.50/1.00 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % NegExts : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Equation resolutions : 16
% 1.50/1.00 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Total rewrite steps : 875
% 1.50/1.00 % ...of those cached : 514
% 1.50/1.00 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.50/1.00 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.50/1.00 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.50/1.00 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.50/1.00 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.50/1.00 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.50/1.00 % Current number of processed clauses : 2172
% 1.50/1.00 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 771
% 1.50/1.00 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 1.50/1.00 % Non-unit-clauses : 1397
% 1.50/1.00 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4016
% 1.50/1.00 % ...number of literals in the above : 9514
% 1.50/1.00 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Current number of archived clauses : 27
% 1.50/1.00 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 810463
% 1.50/1.00 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 153119
% 1.50/1.00 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 360
% 1.50/1.00 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 135386
% 1.50/1.00 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % BW rewrite match attempts : 21
% 1.50/1.00 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.50/1.00 % Termbank termtop insertions : 176199
% 1.50/1.00 % Search garbage collected termcells : 19086
% 1.50/1.00
% 1.50/1.00 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.50/1.00 % User time : 0.539 s
% 1.50/1.00 % System time : 0.023 s
% 1.50/1.00 % Total time : 0.562 s
% 1.50/1.00 % Maximum resident set size: 7508 pages
% 1.50/1.00
% 1.50/1.00 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.50/1.00 % User time : 1.532 s
% 1.50/1.00 % System time : 0.122 s
% 1.50/1.00 % Total time : 1.654 s
% 1.50/1.00 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 1.50/1.00 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------