%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWB011+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n024.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:05:18 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.60s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.56s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWB011+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % 0.06/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 18 18:08:24 EDT 2024 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.60 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.54/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.54/0.60 % Transform :cnf % 0.54/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.54/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.54/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.54/0.60 % File : SWB011+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % 0.54/0.60 % Domain : Semantic Web % 0.54/0.60 % Problem : Entity Types as Classes % 0.54/0.60 % Version : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete. % 0.54/0.60 % English : % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 % Refs : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.54/0.60 % Source : [Sch11] % 0.54/0.60 % Names : 011_Entity_Types_as_Classes [Sch11] % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.54/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.25 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.25 v6.1.0, 0.00 v5.2.0 % 0.54/0.60 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 3 ( 0 unt; 0 def) % 0.54/0.60 % Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ) % 0.54/0.60 % Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 3 avg) % 0.54/0.60 % Number of connectives : 8 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 5 &) % 0.54/0.60 % ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.54/0.60 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg) % 0.54/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.54/0.60 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 1-3 aty) % 0.54/0.60 % Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty) % 0.54/0.60 % Number of variables : 5 ( 5 !; 0 ?) % 0.54/0.60 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_NEQ % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 % Comments : % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.54/0.60 fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom, % 0.54/0.60 ! [X,C] : % 0.54/0.60 ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X,C) % 0.54/0.60 <=> icext(C,X) ) ). % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 fof(owl_eqdis_disjointwith,axiom, % 0.54/0.60 ! [C1,C2] : % 0.54/0.60 ( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,C1,C2) % 0.54/0.60 <=> ( ic(C1) % 0.54/0.60 & ic(C2) % 0.54/0.60 & ! [X] : % 0.54/0.60 ~ ( icext(C1,X) % 0.54/0.60 & icext(C2,X) ) ) ) ). % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 fof(testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes,axiom, % 0.54/0.60 ( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_owl_Class,uri_owl_ObjectProperty) % 0.54/0.60 & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_Class) % 0.54/0.60 & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_ObjectProperty) ) ). % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.60 % Proof found % 0.54/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.54/0.60 % SZS output start Proof % 0.56/0.61 %ClaNum:10(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.56/0.61 %VarNum:34(SingletonVarNum:15) % 0.56/0.61 %MaxLitNum:4 % 0.56/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.56/0.61 %SharedTerms:8 % 0.56/0.61 [1]P1(a1,a2,a4) % 0.56/0.61 [2]P1(a1,a2,a5) % 0.56/0.61 [3]P1(a6,a4,a5) % 0.56/0.61 [4]~P2(x42,x41)+P1(a1,x41,x42) % 0.56/0.61 [5]P3(x51)+~P1(a6,x52,x51) % 0.56/0.61 [6]P3(x61)+~P1(a6,x61,x62) % 0.56/0.61 [7]P2(x71,x72)+~P1(a1,x72,x71) % 0.56/0.61 [10]~P2(x101,x102)+~P2(x103,x102)+~P1(a6,x103,x101) % 0.56/0.61 [8]~P3(x81)+~P3(x82)+P1(a6,x81,x82)+P2(x82,f3(x81,x82)) % 0.56/0.61 [9]~P3(x92)+~P3(x91)+P1(a6,x91,x92)+P2(x91,f3(x91,x92)) % 0.56/0.61 %EqnAxiom % 0.56/0.61 % 0.56/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.56/0.61 cnf(17,plain, % 0.56/0.61 (~P2(a5,a2)), % 0.56/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,5,6,7,10])). % 0.56/0.61 cnf(19,plain, % 0.56/0.61 ($false), % 0.56/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,2,7]), % 0.56/0.61 ['proof']). % 0.56/0.61 % SZS output end Proof % 0.56/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------