%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB011+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:37:59 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 44 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 52 ( 22 ~; 18 |; 10 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_eqdis_disjointwith,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X3,X4)
<=> ( ! [X1] :
~ ( icext(X4,X1)
& icext(X3,X1) )
& ic(X4)
& ic(X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_eqdis_disjointwith) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_ObjectProperty)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_Class)
& iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_owl_Class,uri_owl_ObjectProperty) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
<=> icext(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X10,X11)
| ~ ic(X11)
| ~ ic(X10)
| icext(X11,esk1_2(X10,X11)) )
& ( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X10,X11)
| ~ ic(X11)
| ~ ic(X10)
| icext(X10,esk1_2(X10,X11)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X7,X8)
| ~ icext(X8,X9)
| ~ icext(X7,X9) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X7,X8)
| ic(X8) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X7,X8)
| ic(X7) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_disjointwith])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X1,X3)
| ~ icext(X3,X2)
| ~ icext(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_owl_Class,uri_owl_ObjectProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X5,X6)
| ~ icext(X6,X5) )
& ( icext(X6,X5)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X5,X6) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ icext(uri_owl_Class,X1)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_ObjectProperty,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| icext(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_owl_ObjectProperty)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_Class,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_owl_Class)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_owl_ObjectProperty) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_ObjectProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_Class),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB011+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:41:01 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.42 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2784325 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.15/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.42 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.42 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2784332 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.42 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.42 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.42 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42 % Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.15/0.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Initial clauses : 10
% 0.15/0.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.15/0.42 % Processed clauses : 14
% 0.15/0.42 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 14
% 0.15/0.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Generated clauses : 10
% 0.15/0.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8
% 0.15/0.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Paramodulations : 10
% 0.15/0.42 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.15/0.42 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.15/0.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 9
% 0.15/0.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.15/0.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 14
% 0.15/0.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9
% 0.15/0.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.15/0.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.15/0.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 646
% 0.15/0.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 119
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.42 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.42 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.42 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.42 % Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.15/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/0.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------