%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWB015+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:01:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.29s 1.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 6 ~; 3 |; 1 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 2 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_015_Reflective_Tautologies_I,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',testcase_conclusion_fullish_015_Reflective_Tautologies_I) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X4,X7)
<=> X4 = X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_015_Reflective_Tautologies_I]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X8,X9,X8,X9] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X8,X9)
| X8 = X9 )
& ( X8 != X9
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_sameas])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
| X1 != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWB015+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 04:47:55 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.29/1.47 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.29/1.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.29/1.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 0.29/1.47
% 0.29/1.47 # Proof found!
% 0.29/1.47 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.29/1.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.29/1.47 # Proof object total steps : 9
% 0.29/1.47 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 0.29/1.47 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.29/1.47 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.29/1.47 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.29/1.47 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.29/1.47 # Proof object initial clauses used : 2
% 0.29/1.47 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.29/1.47 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.29/1.47 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.29/1.47 # Parsed axioms : 559
% 0.29/1.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 543
% 0.29/1.47 # Initial clauses : 19
% 0.29/1.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 11
% 0.29/1.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.29/1.47 # Processed clauses : 9
% 0.29/1.47 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.29/1.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.29/1.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.29/1.47 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.29/1.47 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1
% 0.29/1.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.29/1.47 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.29/1.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.29/1.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.29/1.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.29/1.47 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.29/1.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.29/1.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.29/1.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.29/1.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.29/1.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.29/1.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7602
% 0.29/1.47
% 0.29/1.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/1.47 # User time : 0.024 s
% 0.29/1.47 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.29/1.47 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 0.29/1.47 # Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------