↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SWB016+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:05:22 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 58.61s 58.82s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 58.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14  % Problem    : SWB016+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.38  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.38  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.38  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.38  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.38  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.38  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 17:43:54 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.46/0.63  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 58.61/58.81  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.61/58.81  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 58.61/58.81  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 58.61/58.81  % Transform   :cnf
% 58.61/58.81  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 58.61/58.81  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 58.61/58.81  
% 58.61/58.81  % Result      :Theorem 58.010000s
% 58.61/58.81  % Output      :CNFRefutation 58.010000s
% 58.61/58.81  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.61/58.82  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.61/58.82  % File     : SWB016+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 58.61/58.82  % Domain   : Semantic Web
% 58.61/58.82  % Problem  : Reflective Tautologies II
% 58.61/58.82  % Version  : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 58.61/58.82  % English  :
% 58.61/58.82  
% 58.61/58.82  % Refs     : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 58.61/58.82  % Source   : [Sch11]
% 58.61/58.82  % Names    : 016_Reflective_Tautologies_II [Sch11]
% 58.61/58.82  
% 58.61/58.82  % Status   : Theorem
% 58.61/58.82  % Rating   : 0.06 v8.2.0, 0.07 v8.1.0, 0.14 v7.5.0, 0.10 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.12 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0
% 58.61/58.82  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   4 unt;   0 def)
% 58.61/58.82  %            Number of atoms       :   29 (   0 equ)
% 58.61/58.82  %            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
% 58.61/58.82  %            Number of connectives :   18 (   0   ~;   0   |;   8   &)
% 58.61/58.82  %                                         (   6 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 58.61/58.82  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
% 58.61/58.82  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 58.61/58.82  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 58.61/58.82  %            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
% 58.61/58.82  %            Number of variables   :   19 (  19   !;   0   ?)
% 58.61/58.82  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 58.61/58.82  
% 58.61/58.82  % Comments :
% 58.61/58.82  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.61/58.82  fof(rdf_type_ip,axiom,
% 58.61/58.82      ! [P] :
% 58.61/58.82        ( iext(uri_rdf_type,P,uri_rdf_Property)
% 58.61/58.82      <=> ip(P) ) ).
% 58.61/58.82  
% 58.61/58.82  fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
% 58.61/58.82      ! [X,C] :
% 58.61/58.82        ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X,C)
% 58.61/58.82      <=> icext(C,X) ) ).
% 58.61/58.82  
% 58.61/58.82  fof(rdfs_domain_main,axiom,
% 58.61/58.82      ! [P,C,X,Y] :
% 58.61/58.82        ( ( iext(uri_rdfs_domain,P,C)
% 58.61/58.82          & iext(P,X,Y) )
% 58.61/58.82       => icext(C,X) ) ).
% 58.61/58.82  
% 58.61/58.82  fof(rdfs_domain_domain,axiom,
% 58.61/58.82      iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_rdfs_domain,uri_rdf_Property) ).
% 58.61/58.82  
% 58.61/58.82  fof(rdfs_subclassof_domain,axiom,
% 58.61/58.82      iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_rdfs_Class) ).
% 58.61/58.82  
% 58.61/58.82  fof(owl_prop_equivalentclass_type,axiom,
% 58.61/58.82      ip(uri_owl_equivalentClass) ).
% 58.61/58.82  
% 58.61/58.82  fof(owl_prop_equivalentclass_ext,axiom,
% 58.61/58.82      ! [X,Y] :
% 58.61/58.82        ( iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,X,Y)
% 58.61/58.82       => ( ic(X)
% 58.61/58.82          & ic(Y) ) ) ).
% 58.61/58.82  
% 58.61/58.82  fof(owl_rdfsext_subclassof,axiom,
% 58.61/58.82      ! [C1,C2] :
% 58.61/58.82        ( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,C1,C2)
% 58.61/58.82      <=> ( ic(C1)
% 58.61/58.82          & ic(C2)
% 58.61/58.82          & ! [X] :
% 58.61/58.82              ( icext(C1,X)
% 58.61/58.82             => icext(C2,X) ) ) ) ).
% 58.61/58.82  
% 58.61/58.82  fof(owl_rdfsext_subpropertyof,axiom,
% 58.61/58.82      ! [P1,P2] :
% 58.61/58.82        ( iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,P1,P2)
% 58.61/58.82      <=> ( ip(P1)
% 58.61/58.82          & ip(P2)
% 58.61/58.82          & ! [X,Y] :
% 58.61/58.82              ( iext(P1,X,Y)
% 58.61/58.82             => iext(P2,X,Y) ) ) ) ).
% 58.61/58.82  
% 58.61/58.82  fof(owl_eqdis_equivalentclass,axiom,
% 58.61/58.82      ! [C1,C2] :
% 58.61/58.82        ( iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,C1,C2)
% 58.61/58.82      <=> ( ic(C1)
% 58.61/58.82          & ic(C2)
% 58.61/58.82          & ! [X] :
% 58.61/58.82              ( icext(C1,X)
% 58.61/58.82            <=> icext(C2,X) ) ) ) ).
% 58.61/58.82  
% 58.61/58.82  fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_016_Reflective_Tautologies_II,conjecture,
% 58.61/58.82      iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_equivalentClass,uri_rdfs_subClassOf) ).
% 58.61/58.82  
% 58.61/58.82  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.61/58.82  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.61/58.82  % Proof found
% 58.61/58.82  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 58.61/58.82  % SZS output start Proof
% 58.61/58.82  %ClaNum:27(EqnAxiom:0)
% 58.61/58.82  %VarNum:115(SingletonVarNum:47)
% 58.61/58.82  %MaxLitNum:5
% 58.61/58.82  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 58.61/58.82  %SharedTerms:11
% 58.61/58.82  %goalClause: 4
% 58.61/58.82  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 58.61/58.82  [1]P1(a1)
% 58.61/58.82  [2]P2(a6,a6,a7)
% 58.61/58.82  [3]P2(a6,a10,a8)
% 58.61/58.82  [4]~P2(a11,a1,a10)
% 58.61/58.82  [5]~P1(x51)+P2(a9,x51,a7)
% 58.61/58.82  [7]P1(x71)+~P2(a9,x71,a7)
% 58.61/58.82  [6]~P3(x62,x61)+P2(a9,x61,x62)
% 58.61/58.82  [8]P1(x81)+~P2(a11,x82,x81)
% 58.61/58.82  [9]P1(x91)+~P2(a11,x91,x92)
% 58.61/58.82  [10]P4(x101)+~P2(a10,x102,x101)
% 58.61/58.82  [11]P4(x111)+~P2(a10,x111,x112)
% 58.61/58.82  [13]P4(x131)+~P2(a1,x132,x131)
% 58.61/58.82  [15]P4(x151)+~P2(a1,x151,x152)
% 58.61/58.82  [16]P3(x161,x162)+~P2(a9,x162,x161)
% 58.61/58.82  [18]P3(x181,x182)+~P3(x183,x182)+~P2(a10,x183,x181)
% 58.61/58.82  [19]P3(x191,x192)+~P3(x193,x192)+~P2(a1,x191,x193)
% 58.61/58.82  [20]P3(x201,x202)+~P3(x203,x202)+~P2(a1,x203,x201)
% 58.61/58.82  [24]P3(x241,x242)+~P2(x243,x242,x244)+~P2(a6,x243,x241)
% 58.61/58.82  [26]P2(x261,x262,x263)+~P2(x264,x262,x263)+~P2(a11,x264,x261)
% 58.61/58.82  [17]~P4(x172)+~P4(x171)+P2(a10,x171,x172)+P3(x171,f2(x171,x172))
% 58.61/58.82  [21]~P4(x211)+~P4(x212)+P2(a10,x211,x212)+~P3(x212,f2(x211,x212))
% 58.61/58.82  [23]~P1(x232)+~P1(x231)+P2(x231,f4(x231,x232),f5(x231,x232))+P2(a11,x231,x232)
% 58.61/58.82  [27]~P1(x271)+~P1(x272)+~P2(x272,f4(x271,x272),f5(x271,x272))+P2(a11,x271,x272)
% 58.61/58.82  [22]~P4(x222)+~P4(x221)+P2(a1,x221,x222)+P3(x222,f3(x221,x222))+P3(x221,f3(x221,x222))
% 58.61/58.82  [25]~P4(x252)+~P4(x251)+P2(a1,x251,x252)+~P3(x252,f3(x251,x252))+~P3(x251,f3(x251,x252))
% 58.61/58.82  %EqnAxiom
% 58.61/58.82  
% 58.61/58.82  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(93,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P1(a10)+~P2(a10,f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10))+~P2(a9,a1,a7)),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,7,27])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(94,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P2(a10,f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10))+~P1(a10)),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,93,5])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(99,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (P2(a1,f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10))+~P2(a9,a10,a7)),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,1,7,23])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(100,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (P4(f5(a1,a10))+~P2(a9,a10,a7)),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[99,13])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(101,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (P2(a10,f5(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10))+P3(f5(a1,a10),f2(f5(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10)))+~P2(a9,a10,a7)),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[100,17])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(102,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P4(f5(a1,a10))+P2(a10,f5(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10))+~P2(a9,a10,a7)),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[101,21])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(109,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P2(a9,a10,a7)+~P2(a10,f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,94])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(110,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P3(a7,a10)+~P2(a10,f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[109,6])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(111,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P2(a10,f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3,110,24])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(160,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (P4(f4(a1,a10))+~P2(a9,a10,a7)),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,99])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(161,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P2(a9,a10,a7)+P2(a10,f4(a1,a10),f4(a1,a10))+P3(f4(a1,a10),f2(f4(a1,a10),f4(a1,a10)))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[160,17])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(162,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P4(f4(a1,a10))+~P2(a9,a10,a7)+P2(a10,f4(a1,a10),f4(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[161,21])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(440,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P3(a7,a10)+P2(a1,f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,99])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(441,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (P4(f5(a1,a10))+~P3(a7,a10)),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[440,13])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(442,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P2(a9,a10,a7)+P2(a10,f5(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10))+~P3(a7,a10)),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[441,102])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(455,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P3(a7,a10)+P4(f4(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,160])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(456,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P2(a9,a10,a7)+P2(a10,f4(a1,a10),f4(a1,a10))+~P3(a7,a10)),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[455,162])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(723,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P3(a7,a10)+P2(a10,f5(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,442])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(724,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (P2(a10,f5(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3,723,24])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(725,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (P4(f5(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[724,10])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(737,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P4(f4(a1,a10))+P2(a9,f2(f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10)),f4(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[111,725,6,17])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(738,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (P3(f4(a1,a10),f2(f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10)))+~P4(f4(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[737,16])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(739,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (P3(x7391,f2(f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10)))+~P4(f4(a1,a10))+~P2(a10,f4(a1,a10),x7391)),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[738,18])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(740,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (P3(x7401,f2(f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10)))+~P2(a10,x7402,f4(a1,a10))+~P2(a10,f4(a1,a10),x7401)),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[739,10])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(742,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P3(a7,a10)+P2(a10,f4(a1,a10),f4(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,456])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(743,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (P2(a10,f4(a1,a10),f4(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3,742,24])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(748,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (P3(x7481,f2(f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10)))+~P2(a10,f4(a1,a10),x7481)),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[743,740])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(751,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (P4(f4(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[743,748,11])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(753,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (P2(a9,f2(f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10)),f4(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[743,748,11,737])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(780,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P2(a9,f2(f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10)),f5(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[111,751,725,16,21])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(781,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P3(f5(a1,a10),f2(f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10)))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[780,6])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(821,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P2(a1,f4(a1,a10),f5(a1,a10))),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[753,781,16,20])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(825,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     (~P3(a7,a10)),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[821,440])).
% 58.61/58.83  cnf(2806,plain,
% 58.61/58.83     ($false),
% 58.61/58.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[825,3,2,24]),
% 58.61/58.83     ['proof']).
% 58.61/58.83  % SZS output end Proof
% 58.61/58.83  % Total time :58.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------