%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB017+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:06 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 10.98s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 49 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 52 ( 23 ~; 16 |; 10 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_differentfrom,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X4,X7)
<=> X4 != X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_differentfrom) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith,axiom,
! [X33,X34] :
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X33,X34)
<=> ( ! [X4,X7] :
~ ( iext(X34,X4,X7)
& iext(X33,X4,X7) )
& ip(X34)
& ip(X33) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions,axiom,
( iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X4,X7)
<=> X4 != X7 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_differentfrom]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X47,X48] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X47,X48)
| X47 = X48 )
& ( X47 != X48
| ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X47,X48) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X81,X82,X83,X84,X85,X86] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X85,X86)
| ~ ip(X86)
| ~ ip(X85)
| iext(X86,esk5_2(X85,X86),esk6_2(X85,X86)) )
& ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X85,X86)
| ~ ip(X86)
| ~ ip(X85)
| iext(X85,esk5_2(X85,X86),esk6_2(X85,X86)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X81,X82)
| ~ iext(X82,X83,X84)
| ~ iext(X81,X83,X84) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X81,X82)
| ip(X82) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X81,X82)
| ip(X81) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X1,X4)
| ~ iext(X4,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
uri_ex_u = uri_ex_w,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SWB017+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/10.45 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.18/10.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/10.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/10.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/10.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/10.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/10.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/10.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:40:21 UTC 2026
% 0.18/10.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/10.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/10.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/10.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/10.98 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.21/10.98 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/10.98 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/10.98 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.21/10.98 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.21/10.98 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.21/10.98 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/10.98 % new_bool_1 with pid 390817 completed with status 9
% 0.21/10.98 % new_bool_3 with pid 390816 completed with status 9
% 0.21/10.98 % sh5l with pid 390818 completed with status 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.21/10.98 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/10.98 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/10.98 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.21/10.98 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.21/10.98 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.21/10.98 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/10.98 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.21/10.98 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/10.98 % Search class: FGHSF-FMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/10.98 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/10.98 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.21/10.98 % SubtermCWHack with pid 390849 completed with status 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.21/10.98 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/10.98 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/10.98 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.21/10.98 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.21/10.98 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.21/10.98 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/10.98 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.21/10.98 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/10.98 % Search class: FGHSF-FMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/10.98 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/10.98 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.21/10.98 % Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 0.21/10.98
% 0.21/10.98 % Proof found!
% 0.21/10.98 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/10.98 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/10.98 % Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.21/10.98 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 231
% 0.21/10.98 % Initial clauses : 937
% 0.21/10.98 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 40
% 0.21/10.98 % Initial clauses in saturation : 897
% 0.21/10.98 % Processed clauses : 3929
% 0.21/10.98 % ...of these trivial : 81
% 0.21/10.98 % ...subsumed : 1364
% 0.21/10.98 % ...remaining for further processing : 2484
% 0.21/10.98 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 15
% 0.21/10.98 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Backward-subsumed : 75
% 0.21/10.98 % Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.21/10.98 % Generated clauses : 18217
% 0.21/10.98 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 15859
% 0.21/10.98 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 6
% 0.21/10.98 % Paramodulations : 18202
% 0.21/10.98 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/10.98 % NegExts : 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Equation resolutions : 15
% 0.21/10.98 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Total rewrite steps : 5493
% 0.21/10.98 % ...of those cached : 5019
% 0.21/10.98 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/10.98 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/10.98 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/10.98 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/10.98 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/10.98 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/10.98 % Current number of processed clauses : 2390
% 0.21/10.98 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 544
% 0.21/10.98 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Negative unit clauses : 30
% 0.21/10.98 % Non-unit-clauses : 1816
% 0.21/10.98 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12737
% 0.21/10.98 % ...number of literals in the above : 54028
% 0.21/10.98 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Current number of archived clauses : 79
% 0.21/10.98 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 367249
% 0.21/10.98 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 230732
% 0.21/10.98 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1058
% 0.21/10.98 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24954
% 0.21/10.98 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/10.98 % BW rewrite match attempts : 134
% 0.21/10.98 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.21/10.98 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/10.98 % Termbank termtop insertions : 309892
% 0.21/10.98 % Search garbage collected termcells : 17283
% 0.21/10.98
% 0.21/10.98 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/10.98 % User time : 0.436 s
% 0.21/10.98 % System time : 0.023 s
% 0.21/10.98 % Total time : 0.459 s
% 0.21/10.98 % Maximum resident set size: 6944 pages
% 0.21/10.98
% 0.21/10.98 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/10.98 % User time : 0.524 s
% 0.21/10.98 % System time : 0.083 s
% 0.21/10.98 % Total time : 0.607 s
% 0.21/10.98 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.21/10.98 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------