%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWB017+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:04:27 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 27.44s 4.84s
% Output : CNFRefutation 27.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 86 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 96 ( 39 ~; 30 |; 24 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 47 ( 0 sgn 41 !; 6 ?; 7 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f345,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X0,X1)
<=> X0 != X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_differentfrom) ).
fof(f353,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1)
<=> ( ! [X2,X3] :
~ ( iext(X1,X2,X3)
& iext(X0,X2,X3) )
& ip(X1)
& ip(X0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith) ).
fof(f559,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
fof(f560,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f559]) ).
fof(f561,axiom,
( iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
fof(f572,plain,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(flattening,[],[f560]) ).
fof(f800,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1)
<=> ( ! [X2,X3] :
( ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X0,X2,X3) )
& ip(X1)
& ip(X0) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f353]) ).
fof(f1320,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X0,X1)
| X0 != X1 )
& ( X0 = X1
| iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X0,X1) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f345]) ).
fof(f1358,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1)
| ( ! [X2,X3] :
( ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X0,X2,X3) )
& ip(X1)
& ip(X0) ) )
& ( ? [X2,X3] :
( iext(X1,X2,X3)
& iext(X0,X2,X3) )
| ~ ip(X1)
| ~ ip(X0)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f800]) ).
fof(f1359,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1)
| ( ! [X2,X3] :
( ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X0,X2,X3) )
& ip(X1)
& ip(X0) ) )
& ( ? [X2,X3] :
( iext(X1,X2,X3)
& iext(X0,X2,X3) )
| ~ ip(X1)
| ~ ip(X0)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f1358]) ).
fof(f1360,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1)
| ( ! [X4,X5] :
( ~ iext(X1,X4,X5)
| ~ iext(X0,X4,X5) )
& ip(X1)
& ip(X0) ) )
& ( ? [X2,X3] :
( iext(X1,X2,X3)
& iext(X0,X2,X3) )
| ~ ip(X1)
| ~ ip(X0)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f1359]) ).
fof(f1361,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1)
| ( ! [X4,X5] :
( ~ iext(X1,X4,X5)
| ~ iext(X0,X4,X5) )
& ip(X1)
& ip(X0) ) )
& ( ( iext(X1,sK178(X0,X1),sK179(X0,X1))
& iext(X0,sK178(X0,X1),sK179(X0,X1)) )
| ~ ip(X1)
| ~ ip(X0)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK178,sK179]),skolemize(X2,sK178(X0,X1)),skolemize(X3,sK179(X0,X1))],[f1360]) ).
fof(f2321,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( X0 = X1
| iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1320]) ).
fof(f2391,plain,
! [X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1)
| ~ iext(X1,X4,X5)
| ~ iext(X0,X4,X5) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1361]) ).
fof(f2749,plain,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f572]) ).
fof(f2750,plain,
iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f561]) ).
fof(f2751,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f561]) ).
fof(f2752,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f561]) ).
tcf(c_909,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X0,X1)
| ( X0 = X1 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2321]) ).
tcf(c_980,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X3,X0)
| ~ iext(X3,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2391]) ).
tcf(c_1326,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2749]) ).
tcf(c_1327,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2752]) ).
tcf(c_1328,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2751]) ).
tcf(c_1329,plain,
iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2750]) ).
tcf(c_6008,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,uri_rdf_type)
| ~ iext(X0,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1328,c_980]) ).
tcf(c_6496,plain,
~ iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1327,c_6008]) ).
tcf(c_9665,plain,
uri_ex_w = uri_ex_u,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_909,c_1326]) ).
tcf(c_9677,plain,
iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_9665,c_1329]) ).
tcf(c_9679,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_9677,c_6496]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB017+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 15:24:03 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.41
% 0.11/0.41 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.41
% 0.11/0.41 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.43 % Proving...
% 27.44/4.84 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 27.44/4.84 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84 % ------ iProver source info
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 27.44/4.84 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 27.44/4.84 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84 % ------ Parsing...
% 27.44/4.84 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e %
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84 % ------ Preprocessing...%
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 27.44/4.84 % ------ Proving...
% 27.44/4.84 % ------ Problem Properties
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84 %
% 27.44/4.84 % clauses 1182
% 27.44/4.84 % conjectures 111
% 27.44/4.84 % EPR 721
% 27.44/4.84 % Horn 912
% 27.44/4.84 % unary 212
% 27.44/4.84 % binary 465
% 27.44/4.84 % lits 3827
% 27.44/4.84 % lits eq 197
% 27.44/4.84 % fd_pure 0
% 27.44/4.84 % fd_pseudo 0
% 27.44/4.84 % fd_cond 0
% 27.44/4.84 % fd_pseudo_cond 66
% 27.44/4.84 % AC symbols 0
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84 % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84 % ------
% 27.44/4.84 % Current options:
% 27.44/4.84 % ------
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84 %
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84 % ------ Proving...
% 27.44/4.84 %
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 27.44/4.84
% 27.44/4.84
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------