↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SWB017+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:05:22 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.47s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SWB017+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 18:31:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.47/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.47/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.59  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.47/0.59  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.47/0.59  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.47/0.59  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.47/0.59  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.47/0.59  
% 0.47/0.59  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.47/0.59  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.47/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.60  % File     : SWB017+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.47/0.60  % Domain   : Semantic Web
% 0.47/0.60  % Problem  : Built-in Based Definitions
% 0.47/0.60  % Version  : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 0.47/0.60  % English  :
% 0.47/0.60  
% 0.47/0.60  % Refs     : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.47/0.60  % Source   : [Sch11]
% 0.47/0.60  % Names    : 017_Built-in_Based_Definitions [Sch11]
% 0.47/0.60  
% 0.47/0.60  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.47/0.60  % Rating   : 0.14 v7.5.0, 0.16 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.2.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.04 v6.2.0, 0.16 v6.1.0, 0.17 v6.0.0, 0.13 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.15 v5.2.0
% 0.47/0.60  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   1 unt;   0 def)
% 0.47/0.60  %            Number of atoms       :   11 (   1 equ)
% 0.47/0.60  %            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
% 0.47/0.60  %            Number of connectives :    9 (   2   ~;   0   |;   5   &)
% 0.47/0.60  %                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.47/0.60  %            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
% 0.47/0.60  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.47/0.60  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.47/0.60  %            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.47/0.60  %            Number of variables   :    6 (   6   !;   0   ?)
% 0.47/0.60  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.47/0.60  
% 0.47/0.60  % Comments :
% 0.47/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.60  fof(owl_eqdis_differentfrom,axiom,
% 0.47/0.60      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.47/0.60        ( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X,Y)
% 0.47/0.60      <=> X != Y ) ).
% 0.47/0.60  
% 0.47/0.60  fof(owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith,axiom,
% 0.47/0.60      ! [P1,P2] :
% 0.47/0.60        ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,P1,P2)
% 0.47/0.60      <=> ( ip(P1)
% 0.47/0.60          & ip(P2)
% 0.47/0.60          & ! [X,Y] :
% 0.47/0.60              ~ ( iext(P1,X,Y)
% 0.47/0.60                & iext(P2,X,Y) ) ) ) ).
% 0.47/0.60  
% 0.47/0.60  fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions,conjecture,
% 0.47/0.60      iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u) ).
% 0.47/0.60  
% 0.47/0.60  fof(testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions,axiom,
% 0.47/0.60      ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type)
% 0.47/0.60      & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c)
% 0.47/0.60      & iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c) ) ).
% 0.47/0.60  
% 0.47/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.60  % Proof found
% 0.47/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.47/0.60  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.47/0.60  %ClaNum:22(EqnAxiom:11)
% 0.47/0.60  %VarNum:40(SingletonVarNum:16)
% 0.47/0.60  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.47/0.60  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.47/0.60  %SharedTerms:11
% 0.47/0.60  %goalClause: 15
% 0.47/0.60  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.47/0.60  [12]P1(a1,a2,a9)
% 0.47/0.60  [13]P1(a2,a6,a3)
% 0.47/0.60  [14]P1(a9,a7,a3)
% 0.47/0.60  [15]~P1(a8,a7,a6)
% 0.47/0.60  [16]E(x161,x162)+P1(a8,x161,x162)
% 0.47/0.60  [17]~E(x171,x172)+~P1(a8,x171,x172)
% 0.47/0.60  [18]P2(x181)+~P1(a1,x182,x181)
% 0.47/0.60  [19]P2(x191)+~P1(a1,x191,x192)
% 0.47/0.60  [22]~P1(x221,x222,x223)+~P1(x224,x222,x223)+~P1(a1,x224,x221)
% 0.47/0.60  [20]~P2(x201)+~P2(x202)+P1(x202,f4(x201,x202),f5(x201,x202))+P1(a1,x201,x202)
% 0.47/0.60  [21]~P2(x212)+~P2(x211)+P1(x211,f4(x211,x212),f5(x211,x212))+P1(a1,x211,x212)
% 0.47/0.60  %EqnAxiom
% 0.47/0.60  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.47/0.60  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.47/0.60  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.47/0.60  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f4(x41,x43),f4(x42,x43))
% 0.47/0.60  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f4(x53,x51),f4(x53,x52))
% 0.47/0.60  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f5(x61,x63),f5(x62,x63))
% 0.47/0.60  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f5(x73,x71),f5(x73,x72))
% 0.47/0.60  [8]P1(x82,x83,x84)+~E(x81,x82)+~P1(x81,x83,x84)
% 0.47/0.60  [9]P1(x93,x92,x94)+~E(x91,x92)+~P1(x93,x91,x94)
% 0.47/0.60  [10]P1(x103,x104,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P1(x103,x104,x101)
% 0.47/0.60  [11]~P2(x111)+P2(x112)+~E(x111,x112)
% 0.47/0.60  
% 0.47/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.60  cnf(32,plain,
% 0.47/0.60     ($false),
% 0.47/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,12,13,14,16,18,19,2,9,22]),
% 0.47/0.60     ['proof']).
% 0.47/0.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.47/0.60  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------