%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB017+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:07 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.34s 15.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 49 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 52 ( 23 ~; 16 |; 10 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_differentfrom,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2)
<=> X1 != X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_eqdis_differentfrom) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X3,X4)
<=> ( ! [X1,X2] :
~ ( iext(X4,X1,X2)
& iext(X3,X1,X2) )
& ip(X4)
& ip(X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions,axiom,
( iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2)
<=> X1 != X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_differentfrom]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X5,X6)
| X5 = X6 )
& ( X5 != X6
| ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X5,X6) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X11,X12)
| ~ ip(X12)
| ~ ip(X11)
| iext(X12,esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12)) )
& ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X11,X12)
| ~ ip(X12)
| ~ ip(X11)
| iext(X11,esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X7,X8)
| ~ iext(X8,X9,X10)
| ~ iext(X7,X9,X10) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X7,X8)
| ip(X8) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X7,X8)
| ip(X7) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X1,X4)
| ~ iext(X4,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
uri_ex_w = uri_ex_u,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB017+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/15.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/15.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/15.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:40:41 UTC 2026
% 0.11/15.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/15.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/15.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/15.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/15.55 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.34/15.55 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.34/15.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.34/15.55 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.34/15.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.34/15.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.34/15.55 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.34/15.55 % sh5l with pid 503207 completed with status 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.34/15.55 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.34/15.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.34/15.55 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.34/15.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.34/15.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.34/15.55 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.34/15.55 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.34/15.55 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.34/15.55 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.34/15.55 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.34/15.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.34/15.55 % SubtermCWHack with pid 503211 completed with status 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.34/15.55 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.34/15.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.34/15.55 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.34/15.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.34/15.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.34/15.55 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.34/15.55 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.34/15.55 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.34/15.55 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.34/15.55 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.34/15.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.34/15.55 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.34/15.55
% 0.34/15.55 % Proof found!
% 0.34/15.55 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.34/15.55 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.34/15.55 % Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.34/15.55 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Initial clauses : 11
% 0.34/15.55 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Initial clauses in saturation : 11
% 0.34/15.55 % Processed clauses : 16
% 0.34/15.55 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % ...remaining for further processing : 16
% 0.34/15.55 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.34/15.55 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.34/15.55 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.34/15.55 % Generated clauses : 6
% 0.34/15.55 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.34/15.55 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Paramodulations : 5
% 0.34/15.55 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % NegExts : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.34/15.55 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.34/15.55 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.34/15.55 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.34/15.55 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.34/15.55 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.34/15.55 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.34/15.55 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.34/15.55 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.34/15.55 % Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.34/15.55 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.34/15.55 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.34/15.55 % Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.34/15.55 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.34/15.55 % ...number of literals in the above : 8
% 0.34/15.55 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.34/15.55 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.34/15.55 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.34/15.55 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.34/15.55 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.34/15.55 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.34/15.55 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.34/15.55 % Termbank termtop insertions : 607
% 0.34/15.55 % Search garbage collected termcells : 131
% 0.34/15.55
% 0.34/15.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.34/15.55 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.34/15.55 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.34/15.55 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.34/15.55 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.34/15.55
% 0.34/15.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.34/15.55 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.34/15.55 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.34/15.55 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.34/15.55 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.34/15.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------