%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SWB017+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:50:34 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.67s 12.64s
% Output : Refutation 3.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 31 ( 3 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 98 ( 8 ~; 0 |; 15 &; 69 @)
% ( 2 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 11 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 ^; 14 !; 0 ?; 14 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(iext_decl,type,
iext: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(uri_owl_differentFrom_decl,type,
uri_owl_differentFrom: $i ).
thf(uri_ex_w_decl,type,
uri_ex_w: $i ).
thf(uri_ex_u_decl,type,
uri_ex_u: $i ).
thf(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith_decl,type,
uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith: $i ).
thf(ip_decl,type,
ip: $i > $o ).
thf(uri_ex_notInstanceOf_decl,type,
uri_ex_notInstanceOf: $i ).
thf(uri_rdf_type_decl,type,
uri_rdf_type: $i ).
thf(uri_ex_c_decl,type,
uri_ex_c: $i ).
thf(1,conjecture,
uri_ex_u @ ( uri_ex_w @ ( uri_owl_differentFrom @ iext ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( uri_ex_u @ ( uri_ex_w @ ( uri_owl_differentFrom @ iext ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(6,plain,
~ ( uri_ex_u @ ( uri_ex_w @ ( uri_owl_differentFrom @ iext ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ( uri_owl_differentFrom @ iext ) ) )
<=> ( A != B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_eqdis_differentfrom) ).
thf(7,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( A != B )
=> ( B @ ( A @ ( uri_owl_differentFrom @ iext ) ) ) )
& ( ( B @ ( A @ ( uri_owl_differentFrom @ iext ) ) )
=> ( A != B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ( uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith @ iext ) ) )
<=> ( ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
~ ( ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ iext ) ) )
& ( D @ ( C @ ( A @ iext ) ) ) )
& ( B @ ip )
& ( A @ ip ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith) ).
thf(16,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
~ ( ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ iext ) ) )
& ( D @ ( C @ ( A @ iext ) ) ) )
& ( B @ ip )
& ( A @ ip ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ ( uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith @ iext ) ) ) )
& ( ( B @ ( A @ ( uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith @ iext ) ) )
=> ( ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
~ ( ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ iext ) ) )
& ( D @ ( C @ ( A @ iext ) ) ) )
& ( B @ ip )
& ( A @ ip ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
( ( uri_ex_c @ ( uri_ex_u @ ( uri_ex_notInstanceOf @ iext ) ) )
& ( uri_ex_c @ ( uri_ex_w @ ( uri_rdf_type @ iext ) ) )
& ( uri_rdf_type @ ( uri_ex_notInstanceOf @ ( uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith @ iext ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
thf(26,plain,
( ( uri_ex_c @ ( uri_ex_u @ ( uri_ex_notInstanceOf @ iext ) ) )
& ( uri_ex_c @ ( uri_ex_w @ ( uri_rdf_type @ iext ) ) )
& ( uri_rdf_type @ ( uri_ex_notInstanceOf @ ( uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith @ iext ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(34,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[6,7,16,26]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB017+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.15/10.64 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/10.64 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/10.64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/10.64 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/10.64 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/10.64 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/10.64 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/10.64 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 11:45:59 UTC 2026
% 0.15/10.65 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/10.65 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.95/11.23 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.31/11.42 % [INFO] Parsing done (182ms).
% 1.31/11.44 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.91/11.85 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.91/11.85 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.12/11.94 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 3 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.12/11.97 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 3 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.12/11.99 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.12/12.00 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.12/12.01 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 3.67/12.63 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.67/12.63 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 3.67/12.63 % Time passed: 1846ms (effective reasoning time: 1192ms)
% 3.67/12.63 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.67/12.64 % Axioms used in derivation (3): owl_eqdis_differentfrom, owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith, testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions
% 3.67/12.64 % No. of inferences in proof: 10
% 3.67/12.64 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1846 ms resp. 1192 ms w/o parsing
% 3.67/12.68 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.67/12.68 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------