%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB018+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:08 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 5.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 39 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 33 ( 15 ~; 11 |; 4 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 4 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(rdfs_domain_main,axiom,
! [X3,X2,X1,X4] :
( ( iext(X3,X1,X4)
& iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X3,X2) )
=> icext(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rdfs_domain_main) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
! [X1,X4] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X4)
<=> X1 = X4 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics,axiom,
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u)
& iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_Person) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
<=> icext(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10] :
( icext(X8,X9)
| ~ iext(X7,X9,X10)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X7,X8) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_domain_main])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X11,X12] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X11,X12)
| X11 != X12 )
& ( X11 = X12
| ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X11,X12) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_sameas])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ iext(X1,X3,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X1,X2)
| icext(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_Person),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X1 != X2
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X5,X6)
| ~ icext(X6,X5) )
& ( icext(X6,X5)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X5,X6) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
| icext(uri_ex_Person,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ icext(X1,X2)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
icext(uri_ex_Person,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_ex_Person),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWB018+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/5.36 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/5.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:45:01 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/5.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/5.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/5.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/5.42 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/5.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/5.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/5.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/5.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.42 % sh5l with pid 1930493 completed with status 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.13/5.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/5.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/5.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/5.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.13/5.42 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.13/5.42 % Search class: FHUSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/5.42 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/5.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.42 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1930499 completed with status 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/5.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/5.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/5.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/5.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.13/5.42 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.13/5.42 % Search class: FHUSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/5.42 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/5.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/5.42
% 0.13/5.42 % Proof found!
% 0.13/5.42 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/5.42 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/5.42 % Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.13/5.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Initial clauses : 8
% 0.13/5.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.13/5.42 % Processed clauses : 13
% 0.13/5.42 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.13/5.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.13/5.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.13/5.42 % Generated clauses : 6
% 0.13/5.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.13/5.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Paramodulations : 5
% 0.13/5.42 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.13/5.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.13/5.42 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/5.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/5.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/5.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/5.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/5.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/5.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.13/5.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.13/5.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.13/5.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.13/5.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.13/5.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.13/5.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.13/5.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.13/5.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.13/5.42 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/5.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 458
% 0.13/5.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 65
% 0.13/5.42
% 0.13/5.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/5.42 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.13/5.42 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/5.42 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.13/5.42 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.13/5.42
% 0.13/5.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/5.42 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.13/5.42 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/5.42 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.13/5.42 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.13/5.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------