↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWB018+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:20:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.96s 2.16s
% Output   : Refutation 1.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWB018+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun  1 09:25:26 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.35  Wed Jun  1 09:25:26 2022
% 0.19/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 19554.
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.35  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.19/0.35  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [copy,9,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.44/1.62  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.44/1.62  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.44/1.62  number of clauses in intial UL: 6
% 1.44/1.62  number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 1.44/1.62  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 1.44/1.62  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 88
% 1.44/1.62  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 1.44/1.62  absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 1.44/1.62     distinct predicate count: 3
% 1.44/1.62     distinct function count: 0
% 1.44/1.62     distinct constant count: 6
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.96/2.16  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.96/2.16  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  Model 2 [ 1 1 78 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.77 sec ----> 18 [binary,17.1,6.1] {-} $F.
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.96/2.16  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.96/2.16  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  2 [] {+} iext(uri_rdf_type,A,B)| -icext(B,A).
% 1.96/2.16  3 [] {+} -iext(uri_rdfs_domain,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|icext(B,C).
% 1.96/2.16  4 [] {+} -iext(uri_owl_sameAs,A,B)|A=B.
% 1.96/2.16  6 [] {+} -iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person).
% 1.96/2.16  7 [] {-} iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_Person).
% 1.96/2.16  8 [] {+} iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u).
% 1.96/2.16  14,13 [hyper,8,4] {+} uri_ex_w=uri_ex_u.
% 1.96/2.16  15 [hyper,8,3,7,demod,14] {-} icext(uri_ex_Person,uri_ex_u).
% 1.96/2.16  17 [hyper,15,2] {-} iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person).
% 1.96/2.16  18 [binary,17.1,6.1] {-} $F.
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.96/2.16  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  ============ end of search ============
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  true clauses given           0      (0.0%)
% 1.96/2.16  false clauses given          3
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.96/2.16     3  0         2
% 1.96/2.16     4  0         1
% 1.96/2.16     8  3         0
% 1.96/2.16  tot:  3         3      (50.0% true)
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  Model 2 [ 1 -42 78 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.96/2.16  
% 1.96/2.16  Process 19554 finished Wed Jun  1 09:25:28 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------