%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB019+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:39:02 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.56s 2.15s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 36 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 42 ( 15 ~; 13 |; 13 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith,axiom,
! [X33,X34] :
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X33,X34)
<=> ( ! [X4,X7] :
~ ( iext(X34,X4,X7)
& iext(X33,X4,X7) )
& ip(X34)
& ip(X33) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties,axiom,
( iext(uri_skos_altLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo))
& iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo))
& iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_skos_altLabel)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_skos_altLabel,uri_rdfs_label)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_skos_altLabel,uri_owl_AnnotationProperty)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_rdfs_label)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_owl_AnnotationProperty) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
! [X831,X832,X833,X834,X835,X836] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X835,X836)
| ~ ip(X836)
| ~ ip(X835)
| iext(X836,esk119_2(X835,X836),esk120_2(X835,X836)) )
& ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X835,X836)
| ~ ip(X836)
| ~ ip(X835)
| iext(X835,esk119_2(X835,X836),esk120_2(X835,X836)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X831,X832)
| ~ iext(X832,X833,X834)
| ~ iext(X831,X833,X834) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X831,X832)
| ip(X832) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X831,X832)
| ip(X831) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X1,X4)
| ~ iext(X4,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_skos_altLabel),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_skos_altLabel,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
iext(uri_skos_altLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWB019+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.37 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:39:23 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.56/2.15 % Version: 3.5.1
% 3.56/2.15 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 3.56/2.15 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.56/2.15 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 3.56/2.15 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 3.56/2.15 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 3.56/2.15 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.56/2.15 % new_bool_3 with pid 284856 completed with status 9
% 3.56/2.15 % new_bool_1 with pid 284857 completed with status 9
% 3.56/2.15 % sh5l with pid 284858 completed with status 9
% 3.56/2.15 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 284855 completed with status 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 3.56/2.15 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 3.56/2.15 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.56/2.15 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 3.56/2.15 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.56/2.15 % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.56/2.15 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 3.56/2.15 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 3.56/2.15 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 3.56/2.15 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 3.56/2.15 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 3.56/2.15 % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
% 3.56/2.15 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 284899 completed with status 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 3.56/2.15 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 3.56/2.15 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.56/2.15 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 3.56/2.15 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.56/2.15 % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.56/2.15 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 3.56/2.15 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 3.56/2.15 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 3.56/2.15 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 3.56/2.15 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 3.56/2.15 % Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 3.56/2.15
% 3.56/2.15 % Proof found!
% 3.56/2.15 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.56/2.15 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.56/2.15 % Parsed axioms : 559
% 3.56/2.15 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Initial clauses : 1273
% 3.56/2.15 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 3.56/2.15 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1162
% 3.56/2.15 % Processed clauses : 10802
% 3.56/2.15 % ...of these trivial : 410
% 3.56/2.15 % ...subsumed : 4416
% 3.56/2.15 % ...remaining for further processing : 5976
% 3.56/2.15 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 3.56/2.15 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Backward-subsumed : 26
% 3.56/2.15 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Generated clauses : 42057
% 3.56/2.15 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 32559
% 3.56/2.15 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 16
% 3.56/2.15 % Paramodulations : 42041
% 3.56/2.15 % Factorizations : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % NegExts : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Equation resolutions : 16
% 3.56/2.15 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Total rewrite steps : 9530
% 3.56/2.15 % ...of those cached : 8049
% 3.56/2.15 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Propositional check models : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 3.56/2.15 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 3.56/2.15 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 3.56/2.15 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 3.56/2.15 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 3.56/2.15 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 3.56/2.15 % Current number of processed clauses : 5934
% 3.56/2.15 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2653
% 3.56/2.15 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 3.56/2.15 % Non-unit-clauses : 3277
% 3.56/2.15 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22919
% 3.56/2.15 % ...number of literals in the above : 49873
% 3.56/2.15 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Current number of archived clauses : 27
% 3.56/2.15 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1911161
% 3.56/2.15 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1206753
% 3.56/2.15 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4218
% 3.56/2.15 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 621955
% 3.56/2.15 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % BW rewrite match attempts : 25501
% 3.56/2.15 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Condensation successes : 0
% 3.56/2.15 % Termbank termtop insertions : 533485
% 3.56/2.15 % Search garbage collected termcells : 19058
% 3.56/2.15
% 3.56/2.15 % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.56/2.15 % User time : 1.657 s
% 3.56/2.15 % System time : 0.055 s
% 3.56/2.15 % Total time : 1.712 s
% 3.56/2.15 % Maximum resident set size: 7508 pages
% 3.56/2.15
% 3.56/2.15 % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.56/2.15 % User time : 4.898 s
% 3.56/2.15 % System time : 0.217 s
% 3.56/2.15 % Total time : 5.116 s
% 3.56/2.15 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 3.56/2.15 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------