%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWB019+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:05:24 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.62s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.47s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SWB019+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % 0.08/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 18 18:13:09 EDT 2024 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.47/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.47/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.47/0.61 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.47/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.47/0.61 % Transform :cnf % 0.47/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.47/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.47/0.61 % 0.47/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.47/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.47/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.47/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.47/0.62 % File : SWB019+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % 0.47/0.62 % Domain : Semantic Web % 0.47/0.62 % Problem : Disjoint Annotation Properties % 0.47/0.62 % Version : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete. % 0.47/0.62 % English : % 0.47/0.62 % 0.47/0.62 % Refs : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.47/0.62 % Source : [Sch11] % 0.47/0.62 % Names : 019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties [Sch11] % 0.47/0.62 % 0.47/0.62 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.47/0.62 % Rating : 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.25 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.25 v6.1.0, 0.00 v5.2.0 % 0.47/0.62 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 2 ( 0 unt; 0 def) % 0.47/0.62 % Number of atoms : 12 ( 0 equ) % 0.47/0.62 % Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 6 avg) % 0.47/0.62 % Number of connectives : 11 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 9 &) % 0.47/0.62 % ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.47/0.62 % Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 9 avg) % 0.47/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.47/0.62 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 1-3 aty) % 0.47/0.62 % Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-1 aty) % 0.47/0.62 % Number of variables : 4 ( 4 !; 0 ?) % 0.47/0.62 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_NEQ % 0.47/0.62 % 0.47/0.62 % Comments : % 0.47/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.47/0.62 fof(owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith,axiom, % 0.47/0.62 ! [P1,P2] : % 0.47/0.62 ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,P1,P2) % 0.47/0.62 <=> ( ip(P1) % 0.47/0.62 & ip(P2) % 0.47/0.62 & ! [X,Y] : % 0.47/0.62 ~ ( iext(P1,X,Y) % 0.47/0.62 & iext(P2,X,Y) ) ) ) ). % 0.47/0.62 % 0.47/0.62 fof(testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties,axiom, % 0.47/0.62 ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_owl_AnnotationProperty) % 0.47/0.62 & iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_rdfs_label) % 0.47/0.62 & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_skos_altLabel,uri_owl_AnnotationProperty) % 0.47/0.62 & iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_skos_altLabel,uri_rdfs_label) % 0.47/0.62 & iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_skos_altLabel) % 0.47/0.62 & iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)) % 0.47/0.62 & iext(uri_skos_altLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)) ) ). % 0.47/0.62 % 0.47/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.47/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.47/0.62 % Proof found % 0.47/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.47/0.62 % SZS output start Proof % 0.47/0.62 %ClaNum:12(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.47/0.62 %VarNum:32(SingletonVarNum:12) % 0.47/0.62 %MaxLitNum:4 % 0.47/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.47/0.62 %SharedTerms:17 % 0.47/0.62 [1]P1(a1,a8,a9) % 0.47/0.62 [2]P1(a10,a8,a2) % 0.47/0.62 [3]P1(a10,a9,a2) % 0.47/0.62 [4]P1(a11,a8,a12) % 0.47/0.62 [5]P1(a11,a9,a12) % 0.47/0.62 [6]P1(a8,a3,f5(a4)) % 0.47/0.62 [7]P1(a9,a3,f5(a4)) % 0.47/0.62 [8]P2(x81)+~P1(a1,x82,x81) % 0.47/0.62 [9]P2(x91)+~P1(a1,x91,x92) % 0.47/0.62 [12]~P1(x121,x122,x123)+~P1(x124,x122,x123)+~P1(a1,x124,x121) % 0.47/0.62 [10]~P2(x101)+~P2(x102)+P1(x102,f6(x101,x102),f7(x101,x102))+P1(a1,x101,x102) % 0.47/0.62 [11]~P2(x112)+~P2(x111)+P1(x111,f6(x111,x112),f7(x111,x112))+P1(a1,x111,x112) % 0.47/0.62 %EqnAxiom % 0.47/0.62 % 0.47/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.47/0.62 cnf(17,plain, % 0.47/0.62 ($false), % 0.47/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6,7,8,9,12]), % 0.47/0.62 ['proof']). % 0.47/0.62 % SZS output end Proof % 0.47/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------