%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB019+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:38:10 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 36 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 42 ( 15 ~; 13 |; 13 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X1,X2)
<=> ( ! [X3,X4] :
~ ( iext(X2,X3,X4)
& iext(X1,X3,X4) )
& ip(X2)
& ip(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties,axiom,
( iext(uri_skos_altLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo))
& iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo))
& iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_skos_altLabel)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_skos_altLabel,uri_rdfs_label)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_skos_altLabel,uri_owl_AnnotationProperty)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_rdfs_label)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_owl_AnnotationProperty) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X9,X10)
| ~ ip(X10)
| ~ ip(X9)
| iext(X10,esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10)) )
& ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X9,X10)
| ~ ip(X10)
| ~ ip(X9)
| iext(X9,esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6)
| ~ iext(X6,X7,X8)
| ~ iext(X5,X7,X8) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6)
| ip(X6) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6)
| ip(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X1,X4)
| ~ iext(X4,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_skos_altLabel),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_skos_altLabel,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
iext(uri_skos_altLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWB019+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:40:28 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 1228239 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Result found by G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.13/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1228245 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.43 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.13/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Initial clauses : 12
% 0.13/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.13/0.43 % Processed clauses : 14
% 0.13/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 14
% 0.13/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Generated clauses : 8
% 0.13/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.13/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Paramodulations : 8
% 0.13/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.13/0.43 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.13/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.13/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.13/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.13/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 17
% 0.13/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.13/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.13/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 640
% 0.13/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 106
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.43 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.43 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.43 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.43 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.13/0.43 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.13/0.43 % Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.13/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------