%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWB024+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:05:27 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 0.53s 0.64s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.53s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SWB024+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % 0.12/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 18 17:28:24 EDT 2024 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.53/0.64 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.64 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.53/0.64 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.53/0.64 % Transform :cnf % 0.53/0.64 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.53/0.64 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 % Result :Theorem 0.030000s % 0.53/0.64 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.030000s % 0.53/0.64 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.64 % File : SWB024+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0. % 0.53/0.64 % Domain : Semantic Web % 0.53/0.64 % Problem : Cardinality Restrictions on Complex Properties % 0.53/0.64 % Version : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete. % 0.53/0.64 % English : % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 % Refs : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.53/0.64 % Source : [Sch11] % 0.53/0.64 % Names : 024_Cardinality_Restrictions_on_Complex_Properties [Sch11] % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 % Status : Theorem % 0.53/0.64 % Rating : 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.08 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.13 v5.2.0 % 0.53/0.64 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 0 unt; 0 def) % 0.53/0.64 % Number of atoms : 26 ( 0 equ) % 0.53/0.64 % Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 4 avg) % 0.53/0.64 % Number of connectives : 20 ( 0 ~; 0 |; 13 &) % 0.53/0.64 % ( 4 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.53/0.64 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 7 avg) % 0.53/0.64 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.53/0.64 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 1-3 aty) % 0.53/0.64 % Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 12 con; 0-2 aty) % 0.53/0.64 % Number of variables : 15 ( 12 !; 3 ?) % 0.53/0.64 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 % Comments : % 0.53/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.64 fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom, % 0.53/0.64 ! [X,C] : % 0.53/0.64 ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X,C) % 0.53/0.64 <=> icext(C,X) ) ). % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 fof(owl_restrict_mincard_001,axiom, % 0.53/0.64 ! [Z,P] : % 0.53/0.64 ( ( iext(uri_owl_minCardinality,Z,literal_typed(dat_str_1,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger)) % 0.53/0.64 & iext(uri_owl_onProperty,Z,P) ) % 0.53/0.64 => ! [X] : % 0.53/0.64 ( icext(Z,X) % 0.53/0.64 <=> ? [Y] : iext(P,X,Y) ) ) ). % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 fof(owl_rdfsext_subclassof,axiom, % 0.53/0.64 ! [C1,C2] : % 0.53/0.64 ( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,C1,C2) % 0.53/0.64 <=> ( ic(C1) % 0.53/0.64 & ic(C2) % 0.53/0.64 & ! [X] : % 0.53/0.64 ( icext(C1,X) % 0.53/0.64 => icext(C2,X) ) ) ) ). % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 fof(owl_char_transitive,axiom, % 0.53/0.64 ! [P] : % 0.53/0.64 ( icext(uri_owl_TransitiveProperty,P) % 0.53/0.64 <=> ( ip(P) % 0.53/0.64 & ! [X,Y,Z] : % 0.53/0.64 ( ( iext(P,X,Y) % 0.53/0.64 & iext(P,Y,Z) ) % 0.53/0.64 => iext(P,X,Z) ) ) ) ). % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_024_Cardinality_Restrictions_on_Complex_Properties,conjecture, % 0.53/0.64 ? [BNODE_x] : % 0.53/0.64 ( iext(uri_ex_hasAncestor,uri_ex_bob,BNODE_x) % 0.53/0.64 & iext(uri_ex_hasAncestor,uri_ex_alice,BNODE_x) ) ). % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 fof(testcase_premise_fullish_024_Cardinality_Restrictions_on_Complex_Properties,axiom, % 0.53/0.64 ? [BNODE_z] : % 0.53/0.64 ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_hasAncestor,uri_owl_TransitiveProperty) % 0.53/0.64 & iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_Person,BNODE_z) % 0.53/0.64 & iext(uri_rdf_type,BNODE_z,uri_owl_Restriction) % 0.53/0.64 & iext(uri_owl_onProperty,BNODE_z,uri_ex_hasAncestor) % 0.53/0.64 & iext(uri_owl_minCardinality,BNODE_z,literal_typed(dat_str_1,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger)) % 0.53/0.64 & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_alice,uri_ex_Person) % 0.53/0.64 & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_Person) % 0.53/0.64 & iext(uri_ex_hasAncestor,uri_ex_alice,uri_ex_bob) ) ). % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.64 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.64 % Proof found % 0.53/0.64 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.53/0.64 % SZS output start Proof % 0.53/0.64 %ClaNum:23(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.53/0.64 %VarNum:81(SingletonVarNum:31) % 0.53/0.64 %MaxLitNum:4 % 0.53/0.64 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.53/0.64 %SharedTerms:22 % 0.53/0.64 %goalClause: 20 % 0.53/0.64 [1]P1(a1,a2,a14) % 0.53/0.64 [2]P1(a1,a3,a4) % 0.53/0.64 [3]P1(a1,a13,a4) % 0.53/0.64 [4]P1(a1,a5,a15) % 0.53/0.64 [5]P1(a16,a5,a2) % 0.53/0.64 [6]P1(a18,a4,a5) % 0.53/0.64 [7]P1(a2,a13,a3) % 0.53/0.64 [8]P1(a17,a5,f12(a6,a19)) % 0.53/0.64 [9]P4(x91)+~P2(a14,x91) % 0.53/0.64 [20]~P1(a2,a13,x201)+~P1(a2,a3,x201) % 0.53/0.64 [10]~P2(x102,x101)+P1(a1,x101,x102) % 0.53/0.64 [13]P3(x131)+~P1(a18,x132,x131) % 0.53/0.64 [14]P3(x141)+~P1(a18,x141,x142) % 0.53/0.64 [15]P2(x151,x152)+~P1(a1,x152,x151) % 0.53/0.64 [11]~P4(x111)+P1(x111,f7(x111),f10(x111))+P2(a14,x111) % 0.53/0.64 [12]~P4(x121)+P1(x121,f10(x121),f11(x121))+P2(a14,x121) % 0.53/0.64 [18]~P4(x181)+~P1(x181,f7(x181),f11(x181))+P2(a14,x181) % 0.53/0.64 [17]P2(x171,x172)+~P2(x173,x172)+~P1(a18,x173,x171) % 0.53/0.64 [16]~P3(x162)+~P3(x161)+P1(a18,x161,x162)+P2(x161,f8(x161,x162)) % 0.53/0.64 [19]~P3(x191)+~P3(x192)+P1(a18,x191,x192)+~P2(x192,f8(x191,x192)) % 0.53/0.64 [23]~P2(x233,x232)+~P1(a16,x233,x231)+P1(x231,x232,f9(x233,x231,x232))+~P1(a17,x233,f12(a6,a19)) % 0.53/0.64 [21]~P1(x211,x212,x214)+P1(x211,x212,x213)+~P1(x211,x214,x213)+~P2(a14,x211) % 0.53/0.64 [22]P2(x221,x222)+~P1(x223,x222,x224)+~P1(a16,x221,x223)+~P1(a17,x221,f12(a6,a19)) % 0.53/0.64 %EqnAxiom % 0.53/0.64 % 0.53/0.64 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.65 cnf(28,plain, % 0.53/0.65 (P2(a14,a2)), % 0.53/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6,13,14,15])). % 0.53/0.65 cnf(43,plain, % 0.53/0.65 (P2(a5,a3)), % 0.53/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,6,15,17])). % 0.53/0.65 cnf(69,plain, % 0.53/0.65 (P1(a2,a3,f9(a5,a2,a3))), % 0.53/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[43,8,5,23])). % 0.53/0.65 cnf(71,plain, % 0.53/0.65 (~P1(a2,a13,f9(a5,a2,a3))), % 0.53/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[43,8,5,23,20])). % 0.53/0.65 cnf(73,plain, % 0.53/0.65 ($false), % 0.53/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[71,7,69,28,21]), % 0.53/0.65 ['proof']). % 0.53/0.65 % SZS output end Proof % 0.53/0.65 % Total time :0.030000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------