↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SWB025+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:05:28 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.61s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SWB025+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 18:22:54 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.59/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.63  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.59/0.63  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.59/0.63  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.59/0.63  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.59/0.63  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.59/0.63  
% 0.59/0.63  % Result      :Theorem 0.020000s
% 0.59/0.63  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.020000s
% 0.59/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.61/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.61/0.64  % File     : SWB025+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.61/0.64  % Domain   : Semantic Web
% 0.61/0.64  % Problem  : Cyclic Dependencies between Complex Properties
% 0.61/0.64  % Version  : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 0.61/0.64  % English  :
% 0.61/0.64  
% 0.61/0.64  % Refs     : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.61/0.64  % Source   : [Sch11]
% 0.61/0.64  % Names    : 025_Cyclic_Dependencies_between_Complex_Properties [Sch11]
% 0.61/0.64  
% 0.61/0.64  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.61/0.64  % Rating   : 0.00 v8.2.0, 0.07 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.14 v7.2.0, 0.17 v7.1.0, 0.25 v7.0.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.09 v6.1.0, 0.12 v6.0.0, 0.50 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.3.0, 0.22 v5.2.0
% 0.61/0.64  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.61/0.64  %            Number of atoms       :   33 (   0 equ)
% 0.61/0.64  %            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   8 avg)
% 0.61/0.64  %            Number of connectives :   29 (   0   ~;   0   |;  24   &)
% 0.61/0.64  %                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.61/0.64  %            Maximal formula depth :   20 (  12 avg)
% 0.61/0.64  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.61/0.64  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.61/0.64  %            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;  12 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.61/0.64  %            Number of variables   :   17 (  12   !;   5   ?)
% 0.61/0.64  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.61/0.64  
% 0.61/0.64  % Comments :
% 0.61/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.61/0.64  fof(owl_chain_002,axiom,
% 0.61/0.64      ! [P,S1,P1,S2,P2] :
% 0.61/0.64        ( ( iext(uri_rdf_first,S1,P1)
% 0.61/0.64          & iext(uri_rdf_rest,S1,S2)
% 0.61/0.64          & iext(uri_rdf_first,S2,P2)
% 0.61/0.64          & iext(uri_rdf_rest,S2,uri_rdf_nil) )
% 0.61/0.64       => ( iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,P,S1)
% 0.61/0.64        <=> ( ip(P)
% 0.61/0.64            & ip(P1)
% 0.61/0.64            & ip(P2)
% 0.61/0.64            & ! [Y0,Y1,Y2] :
% 0.61/0.64                ( ( iext(P1,Y0,Y1)
% 0.61/0.64                  & iext(P2,Y1,Y2) )
% 0.61/0.64               => iext(P,Y0,Y2) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.61/0.64  
% 0.61/0.64  fof(owl_inv,axiom,
% 0.61/0.64      ! [P1,P2] :
% 0.61/0.64        ( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,P1,P2)
% 0.61/0.64      <=> ( ip(P1)
% 0.61/0.64          & ip(P2)
% 0.61/0.64          & ! [X,Y] :
% 0.61/0.64              ( iext(P1,X,Y)
% 0.61/0.64            <=> iext(P2,Y,X) ) ) ) ).
% 0.61/0.64  
% 0.61/0.64  fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_025_Cyclic_Dependencies_between_Complex_Properties,conjecture,
% 0.61/0.64      ( iext(uri_ex_hasUncle,uri_ex_alice,uri_ex_charly)
% 0.61/0.64      & iext(uri_ex_hasCousin,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_alice) ) ).
% 0.61/0.64  
% 0.61/0.64  fof(testcase_premise_fullish_025_Cyclic_Dependencies_between_Complex_Properties,axiom,
% 0.61/0.64      ? [BNODE_l11,BNODE_l12,BNODE_l21,BNODE_l22,BNODE_l3] :
% 0.61/0.64        ( iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,uri_ex_hasUncle,BNODE_l11)
% 0.61/0.64        & iext(uri_rdf_first,BNODE_l11,uri_ex_hasCousin)
% 0.61/0.64        & iext(uri_rdf_rest,BNODE_l11,BNODE_l12)
% 0.61/0.64        & iext(uri_rdf_first,BNODE_l12,uri_ex_hasFather)
% 0.61/0.64        & iext(uri_rdf_rest,BNODE_l12,uri_rdf_nil)
% 0.61/0.64        & iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,uri_ex_hasCousin,BNODE_l21)
% 0.61/0.64        & iext(uri_rdf_first,BNODE_l21,uri_ex_hasUncle)
% 0.61/0.64        & iext(uri_rdf_rest,BNODE_l21,BNODE_l22)
% 0.61/0.64        & iext(uri_rdf_first,BNODE_l22,BNODE_l3)
% 0.61/0.64        & iext(uri_rdf_rest,BNODE_l22,uri_rdf_nil)
% 0.61/0.64        & iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,BNODE_l3,uri_ex_hasFather)
% 0.61/0.64        & iext(uri_ex_hasFather,uri_ex_alice,uri_ex_dave)
% 0.61/0.64        & iext(uri_ex_hasCousin,uri_ex_alice,uri_ex_bob)
% 0.61/0.64        & iext(uri_ex_hasFather,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_charly)
% 0.61/0.64        & iext(uri_ex_hasUncle,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_dave) ) ).
% 0.61/0.64  
% 0.61/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.61/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.61/0.64  % Proof found
% 0.61/0.64  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.61/0.64  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.61/0.64  %ClaNum:29(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.61/0.64  %VarNum:167(SingletonVarNum:54)
% 0.61/0.64  %MaxLitNum:9
% 0.61/0.64  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.61/0.64  %SharedTerms:34
% 0.61/0.64  %goalClause: 18
% 0.61/0.64  [1]P1(a1,a2,a9)
% 0.61/0.64  [2]P1(a1,a10,a17)
% 0.61/0.64  [3]P1(a1,a11,a18)
% 0.61/0.64  [4]P1(a1,a12,a3)
% 0.61/0.64  [5]P1(a21,a2,a10)
% 0.61/0.64  [6]P1(a21,a10,a22)
% 0.61/0.64  [7]P1(a21,a11,a12)
% 0.61/0.64  [8]P1(a21,a12,a22)
% 0.61/0.64  [9]P1(a19,a18,a2)
% 0.61/0.64  [10]P1(a19,a9,a11)
% 0.61/0.64  [11]P1(a20,a3,a17)
% 0.61/0.64  [12]P1(a18,a13,a15)
% 0.61/0.64  [13]P1(a9,a14,a13)
% 0.61/0.64  [14]P1(a17,a14,a15)
% 0.61/0.64  [15]P1(a17,a13,a16)
% 0.61/0.64  [18]~P1(a18,a14,a16)+~P1(a9,a13,a14)
% 0.61/0.64  [16]P2(x161)+~P1(a20,x162,x161)
% 0.61/0.64  [17]P2(x171)+~P1(a20,x171,x172)
% 0.61/0.64  [19]P1(x191,x192,x193)+~P1(x194,x193,x192)+~P1(a20,x191,x194)
% 0.61/0.64  [20]P1(x201,x202,x203)+~P1(x204,x203,x202)+~P1(a20,x204,x201)
% 0.61/0.64  [21]~P2(x212)+~P2(x211)+P1(x212,f4(x211,x212),f5(x211,x212))+P1(x211,f5(x211,x212),f4(x211,x212))+P1(a20,x211,x212)
% 0.61/0.64  [22]~P2(x222)+~P2(x221)+~P1(x222,f4(x221,x222),f5(x221,x222))+~P1(x221,f5(x221,x222),f4(x221,x222))+P1(a20,x221,x222)
% 0.61/0.64  [23]P2(x231)+~P1(a21,x233,x232)+~P1(a1,x232,x231)+~P1(a1,x233,x234)+~P1(a19,x235,x233)+~P1(a21,x232,a22)
% 0.61/0.64  [24]P2(x241)+~P1(a21,x244,x242)+~P1(a1,x242,x243)+~P1(a1,x244,x241)+~P1(a19,x245,x244)+~P1(a21,x242,a22)
% 0.61/0.64  [25]P2(x251)+~P1(a21,x254,x252)+~P1(a19,x251,x254)+~P1(a1,x252,x253)+~P1(a1,x254,x255)+~P1(a21,x252,a22)
% 0.61/0.64  [26]P1(x261,x262,x263)+~P1(x264,x265,x263)+~P1(x266,x262,x265)+~P1(a21,x268,x267)+~P1(a19,x261,x268)+~P1(a1,x267,x264)+~P1(a1,x268,x266)+~P1(a21,x267,a22)
% 0.61/0.64  [27]~P2(x275)+~P2(x271)+~P2(x273)+~P1(a1,x274,x275)+~P1(a1,x272,x273)+~P1(a21,x272,x274)+P1(x273,f6(x271,x272,x273,x274,x275),f7(x271,x272,x273,x274,x275))+P1(a19,x271,x272)+~P1(a21,x274,a22)
% 0.61/0.64  [28]~P2(x284)+~P2(x281)+~P2(x283)+~P1(a1,x285,x283)+~P1(a1,x282,x284)+~P1(a21,x282,x285)+P1(x283,f7(x281,x282,x284,x285,x283),f8(x281,x282,x284,x285,x283))+P1(a19,x281,x282)+~P1(a21,x285,a22)
% 0.61/0.64  [29]~P2(x291)+~P2(x293)+~P2(x294)+~P1(a1,x292,x294)+~P1(a21,x292,x295)+~P1(x291,f6(x291,x292,x294,x295,x293),f8(x291,x292,x294,x295,x293))+P1(a19,x291,x292)+~P1(a1,x295,x293)+~P1(a21,x295,a22)
% 0.61/0.64  %EqnAxiom
% 0.61/0.64  
% 0.61/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.61/0.64  cnf(34,plain,
% 0.61/0.64     (P1(a3,a15,a14)),
% 0.61/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,14,16,17,19])).
% 0.61/0.64  cnf(50,plain,
% 0.61/0.64     (P1(a9,a13,a14)),
% 0.61/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,8,11,3,4,7,10,12,15,19,26])).
% 0.61/0.64  cnf(57,plain,
% 0.61/0.64     (~P1(a18,a14,a16)),
% 0.61/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[50,18])).
% 0.61/0.64  cnf(69,plain,
% 0.61/0.64     ($false),
% 0.61/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,57,6,13,15,9,5,2,26]),
% 0.61/0.64     ['proof']).
% 0.61/0.64  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.61/0.64  % Total time :0.020000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------