%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWB026+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:39:14 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.46s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 42 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 143 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 26 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 159 ( 58 ~; 64 |; 29 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 20 ( 20 usr; 16 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 56 ( 3 sgn 32 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(rdfs_domain_main,axiom,
! [X1,X3,X2,X4] :
( ( iext(X1,X2,X4)
& iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X1,X3) )
=> icext(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rdfs_domain_main) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_026_Inferred_Property_Characteristics_I,axiom,
? [X10,X11,X12,X13] :
( iext(uri_rdf_rest,X13,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X13,uri_ex_u)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X11,X13)
& iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,X11)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X12,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X12,uri_ex_w)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X10,X12)
& iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_ex_p,X10) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_026_Inferred_Property_Characteristics_I) ).
fof(owl_enum_class_001,axiom,
! [X5,X6,X7] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_rest,X6,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X6,X7) )
=> ( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X5,X6)
<=> ( ! [X2] :
( icext(X5,X2)
<=> X2 = X7 )
& ic(X5) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_enum_class_001) ).
fof(owl_char_inversefunctional,axiom,
! [X1] :
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
<=> ( ! [X8,X9,X4] :
( ( iext(X1,X9,X4)
& iext(X1,X8,X4) )
=> X8 = X9 )
& ip(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_char_inversefunctional) ).
fof(rdfs_domain_domain,axiom,
iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_rdfs_domain,uri_rdf_Property),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rdfs_domain_domain) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X3)
<=> icext(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_026_Inferred_Property_Characteristics_I,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_026_Inferred_Property_Characteristics_I) ).
fof(rdf_type_ip,axiom,
! [X1] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_rdf_Property)
<=> ip(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rdf_type_ip) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X17,X18,X19,X20] :
( icext(X18,X19)
| ~ iext(X17,X19,X20)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X17,X18) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_domain_main])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk8_0,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,esk8_0,uri_ex_u)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,esk6_0,esk8_0)
& iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,esk6_0)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk7_0,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,esk7_0,uri_ex_w)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,esk5_0,esk7_0)
& iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_ex_p,esk5_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_026_Inferred_Property_Characteristics_I])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X21,X22,X23,X24,X25] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X22,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X22,X23)
| iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X21,X22)
| ~ ic(X21)
| esk1_3(X21,X22,X23) = X23
| icext(X21,esk1_3(X21,X22,X23)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X22,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X22,X23)
| iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X21,X22)
| ~ ic(X21)
| esk1_3(X21,X22,X23) != X23
| ~ icext(X21,esk1_3(X21,X22,X23)) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X22,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X21,X22)
| icext(X21,X25)
| X25 != X23 )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X22,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X21,X22)
| X24 = X23
| ~ icext(X21,X24) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X22,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X21,X22)
| ic(X21) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_enum_class_001])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ iext(X1,X3,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X1,X2)
| icext(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_ex_p,esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X27,X28,X29,X30,X31] :
( ( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X31)
| ~ ip(X31)
| esk2_1(X31) != esk3_1(X31) )
& ( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X31)
| ~ ip(X31)
| iext(X31,esk3_1(X31),esk4_1(X31)) )
& ( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X31)
| ~ ip(X31)
| iext(X31,esk2_1(X31),esk4_1(X31)) )
& ( ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X27)
| X28 = X29
| ~ iext(X27,X29,X30)
| ~ iext(X27,X28,X30) )
& ( ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X27)
| ip(X27) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_char_inversefunctional])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X4,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X4,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X1,X4)
| ~ icext(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk7_0,uri_ex_w),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk7_0,uri_rdf_nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1,X2)
| icext(esk5_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ ip(X1)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk3_1(X1),esk4_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ ip(X1)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk2_1(X1),esk4_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_rdfs_domain,uri_rdf_Property),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdfs_domain_domain]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X2,esk7_0)
| ~ icext(X2,X1)
| X1 = uri_ex_w ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ ip(uri_ex_p)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p)
| icext(esk5_0,esk3_1(uri_ex_p)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
iext(uri_owl_oneOf,esk5_0,esk7_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ ip(uri_ex_p)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p)
| icext(esk5_0,esk2_1(uri_ex_p)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_19]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X15,X16] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X15,X16)
| ~ icext(X16,X15) )
& ( icext(X16,X15)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X15,X16) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X1,X2)
| icext(uri_rdf_Property,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_20]) ).
fof(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_026_Inferred_Property_Characteristics_I]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ ip(X1)
| esk2_1(X1) != esk3_1(X1)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ ip(uri_ex_p)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p)
| esk3_1(uri_ex_p) = uri_ex_w ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ ip(uri_ex_p)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p)
| esk2_1(uri_ex_p) = uri_ex_w ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_24]),c_0_23])]) ).
fof(c_0_31,plain,
! [X14] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X14,uri_rdf_Property)
| ~ ip(X14) )
& ( ip(X14)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X14,uri_rdf_Property) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdf_type_ip])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ icext(X1,X2)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
icext(uri_rdf_Property,uri_ex_p),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ ip(uri_ex_p)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_rdf_Property)
| ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_rdf_Property),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
fof(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_39]),c_0_40]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SWB026+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.45 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 07:46:37 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/0.63 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.46/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.46/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.63 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.46/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.63 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.63 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 1934697 completed with status 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.46/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.46/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.63 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.46/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.46/0.63 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.46/0.63 % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.63 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.63 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.46/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.63 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.63 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2g with 136s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.63 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1934701 completed with status 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.46/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.46/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.63 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.46/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.46/0.63 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.46/0.63 % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.63 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.63 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.46/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.63 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63 % Proof found!
% 0.46/0.63 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.46/0.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.46/0.63 % Parsed axioms : 8
% 0.46/0.63 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Initial clauses : 25
% 0.46/0.63 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Initial clauses in saturation : 25
% 0.46/0.63 % Processed clauses : 71
% 0.46/0.63 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.46/0.63 % ...remaining for further processing : 69
% 0.46/0.63 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.46/0.63 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Backward-subsumed : 7
% 0.46/0.63 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.46/0.63 % Generated clauses : 94
% 0.46/0.63 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 83
% 0.46/0.63 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.46/0.63 % Paramodulations : 93
% 0.46/0.63 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % NegExts : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.46/0.63 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Total rewrite steps : 15
% 0.46/0.63 % ...of those cached : 9
% 0.46/0.63 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.63 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.63 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.63 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.63 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.63 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.63 % Current number of processed clauses : 58
% 0.46/0.63 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.46/0.63 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.46/0.63 % Non-unit-clauses : 42
% 0.46/0.63 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 37
% 0.46/0.63 % ...number of literals in the above : 169
% 0.46/0.63 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.46/0.63 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 663
% 0.46/0.63 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 325
% 0.46/0.63 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 10
% 0.46/0.63 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.46/0.63 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.46/0.63 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.46/0.63 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.46/0.63 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2868
% 0.46/0.63 % Search garbage collected termcells : 374
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.63 % User time : 0.014 s
% 0.46/0.63 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.46/0.63 % Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.46/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.63 % User time : 0.054 s
% 0.46/0.63 % System time : 0.019 s
% 0.46/0.63 % Total time : 0.073 s
% 0.46/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.46/0.63 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------